Talk:The Little Sister

Fair use rationale for Image:RaymondChandler TheLittleSister.jpg

Image:RaymondChandler TheLittleSister.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Plot

Before my edit the plot section was incomplete. It essentially described the opening of the novel and then had just a few sentences that abstracted the rest of the plot. I've fleshed it out a lot (perhaps a bit too much not sure). I've also provided references for an anecdote about Billy Wilder and moved that anecdote from the plot section to a background section which I also added. One thing to do is I don't currently have a copy of the book at hand. I'm going from memory but I've read the book several times and just re-read it a short time ago. The only thing is I can't remember the names of the doctor or the gangster so I've left them out for now but will add them as soon as I can get a copy of the book. Mdebellis (talk) 17:12, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

change Ms. to Miss?

I've made many changes to the page today. I'm done editing for the night but as I review I think I may have been too PC using "Ms" as opposed to "Miss". I think it might be more appropriate to use the language of the novel and the times. Mdebellis (talk) 02:32, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Did you really get the plot right?

First, you have left out what in my view is the highlight of the story -- that Orfamay told Steelgrave where he could find her brother and received US-$ 1,000 in return. But perhaps you did this in order to leave something new for readers to discover?

But I also think you messed up the end concerning Dolores Gonzales. The point of the story here is that it was her, not Steelgrave, who killed Quest (she overheard Orfamay when she told Steelgrave). (Obviously it was also her who killed Stein, a character omitted from your rendering of the plot, which is ok as it would have made the story overly complicated.) Ok, it comes a little bit as a surprise when she states that she did so because HE was the man she had loved but lost to another women, but there is no other way the story can be read. 80.137.122.150 (talk) 17:09, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

The man counting money was not the supervisor, he ran off after his encounter with Marlowe (presumably to fetch help), the supervisor was passed out drunk on a mattress and tries to call Dr Lagardie when Marlowe wakes him. Marlowe leaves him passed out and when he comes back downstairs finds him in the same position but dead with an ice pick in his neck.
Orfamay follows Marlowe to Dr Lagardie's and finds her brother after Marlowe leaves, reporting him to the police before Marlowe can. Marlowe is then questioned by both the Bay City detective looking into the supervisor's death and the more reasonable LA detectives looking into the hotel death. He comes more or less clean and is allowed to leave the next morning but encouraged to use the next few days to straighten things out - i.e. solve the case for the police.
He is then taken by Dolores to see Steelgrave, she confesses that she is leading him into a trap and Steelgrave means to kill Marlowe though it appears Mavis Weld killed Steelgrave first. Marlowe urges Mavis to leave and speak to her agent while he adjusts the scene to make it appear more ambiguous correctly figuring that the police will be less interested in finding the killer of a known gangster they themselves were unable to put in prison.
Subsequently, Marlowe meets with Orfamay and deduces that she received the money she claims is from her sister, instead from Steelgrave for selling out her brother. After his final talk with Dolores, it appears that Steelgrave was not really interested in Orrin, but as Dolores had been scheming with him, she came to silence him, and to stop his ice pick murders as he was getting out of control and it can be inferred, to throw suspicion on Mavis, by her using the matching .32 gun to the one Mavis owned, and carelessly leaving the shells lying around (which Marlowe had earlier pocketed on waking to find Orrin dying).
The plot summary is far too long and detailed, but it now has most of the important points in the right order, I leave it to someone else to cut it down to size. 89.241.78.106 (talk) 23:52, 20 July 2015 (UTC)