Talk:Buckminster Fuller

Practical achievements

Sort these, not all are his: Practical achievements Fuller introduced a number of concepts, and helped develop others. Certainly, a number of his projects were not successful in terms of commitment from industry or acceptance by most of the public. However, more than 500,000 geodesic domes have been built around the world and many are in use. According to the Buckminster Fuller Institute, the largest geodesic-dome structures are:

• Seagaia Ocean Dome: Miyazaki, Japan, 216 m (710 ft).
• Multi-Purpose Arena: Nagoya, Japan, 187 m (614 ft).
• Tacoma Dome: Tacoma, Washington, USA, 162 m (530 ft).
• Superior Dome: Northern Michigan Univ. Marquette, Michigan, USA, 160 m (525 ft).
• Walkup Skydome: Northern Arizona Univ. Flagstaff, Arizona, USA, 153 m (502 ft).
• Poliedro de Caracas: Caracas, Venezuela, 145 m (475 ft).
• Round Valley High School Stadium: Springerville-Eagar, Arizona, USA, 134 m (440 ft).
• Former Spruce Goose Hangar: Long Beach, California, USA, 126 m (415 ft).
• Formosa Plastics Storage Facility: Mai Liao, Taiwan, 123 m (402 ft).
• Union Tank Car Maintenance Facility: Baton Rouge, Louisiana USA, 117 m (384 ft), destroyed in November 2007.
• Lehigh Portland Cement Storage Facility: Union Bridge, Maryland USA, 114 m (374 ft).
• The Eden Project, Cornwall, United Kingdom

Panoramic view of the geodesic domes at the Eden Project

Other notable domes include:

• Spaceship Earth at Disney World's Epcot Center in Florida, 80.8-meters (265 ft) wide (Spaceship Earth is actually a self-supporting geodesic sphere, the only one currently in existence.)
• The former USA Pavilion at Expo 67 in Montréal - 76 meters wide (250 ft) - became the Montreal Biosphère, an environmental museum on Île Sainte-Hèlène. In 1967, the US government selected the Dome structure, but did not retain the world vision exposition concept proposed by Buckminster Fuller: A giant Planet Earth Globe within the Dome with a multimedia presentation that would have demonstrated how we could make the world work for all of humanity within 10 years if we switched from "Killingry to Livingry".
• The Gold Dome in Oklahoma City, formerly a bank and now a multicultural society and business center.
• Downtown Vancouver, British Columbia, is a geodesic sphere hosting the Telus World of Science, a science centre (formerly called Science World), that was originally the Expo Centre built for Expo 86.
• The dome over a shopping center in downtown Ankara, Turkey, 109.7-meter (360 ft) tall
• The dome enclosing a civic center in Stockholm, Sweden, 85.3-meter (280 ft) high.
• The world's largest aluminum dome formerly housed the “Spruce Goose” airplane in Long Beach Harbor, California, USA.

However, contrary to Fuller's hopes, domes are not an everyday sight in most places. In practice, most of the smaller owner-built geodesic structures had disadvantages (see geodesic domes), including their unconventional appearance.

A spin-off of Fuller's dome-design conceptualization was the Buckminster Ball, which was the official FIFA approved design for footballs (association football), from their introduction at the 1970 World Cup until recently. The design was a truncated icosahedron – essentially a "Geodesic Sphere", consisting of 12 pentagonal and 20 hexagonal panels. This was used continuously for 34 years until replaced by the 14-panel Teamgeist for the 2006 World Cup.

Fuller was followed (historically) by other designers and architects, such as Sir Norman Foster and Steve Baer, willing to explore the possibilities of new geometries in the design of buildings, not based on conventional rectangles.

References

First paragraph of Biography

Not really sure if this should go in the talk page, but the first paragraph of the biography is not cited. I didn't want to delete it, but it has some trivia-like statements that could easily be inventions of a creative Wikipedia editor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.83.207.60 (talk) 06:25, 6 August 2012 (UTC) Ieashu (talk) 19:10, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Use of Language and Neologisms

I have removed the sentence 'Fuller considered information 'negative-entropic' from the biography section. The content is true, but it needs elaboration. I have changed the section heading 'Neologisms' to 'Use of Language and Neologisms' because I feel it is important to describe and give examples of Fuller's writing style. The new text is certainly not perfect and neither is the referencing. There are quotes which I feel are very helpful to the reader and it would be gret if there was a way to link to those quotes. Thanks to all for editing / sharing. - Dobtoronto, October 31st 2006

Under the heading Geodesic Dome, the section "... non-believers, Fuller hung from the structure’s framework several students who had helped him build it." should be re-written. The implication is that he hung students, literally, which obviously isn't true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.104.73.235 (talk) 23:32, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Commemorative stamp

I found this picture of Buckmintser Fuller. (http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1964/1101640110_400.jpg) Is this usable?

That's the Time magazine version of his commemorative stamp. A link to info about the stamp is in the external links but I would like to see a mention of the stamp with a thumbnail at the tail of the bio. It's the decent thing to do. • Q^#o • 17:02, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Poet? Architect?

Fuller is described in the article's intro as "an American visionary, designer, architect, poet, author, and inventor." I admire him as a great man, but:

I have never read his poetry, though given the voluminous and often turgid prose that he wrote and published, I wonder if the poetry he wrote warrants his being described as a "poet"?

In his friend and student J. Baldwin's book, BuckyWorks, Baldwin cites Fuller as referring to architects as "exterior decorators" and apparently being more comfortable seeing himself as a "designer." What about changing the description of Fuller in the intro to "an American visionary, designer, author, and inventor"? To me that would seem more accurate, though I do feel "philosopher" might be added. Joel Russ 17:39, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Bad poetry is still poetry, y'know. --Gwern (contribs) 19:13 20 February 2007 (GMT)

It seems to me that including this idea that Fuller was a poet may serve to belittle his other accomplishments, which were substantial. To illustrate what I mean, lets imagine that someone like Steve Wozniak plays golf and enjoys it (and I have no idea if he does or doesn't, in actuality - this being just an analogy). If this famous and accomplished person simply dabbles in golf, why refer to him as "a golfer" in the first sentence of an encyclopedia article about him, a sentence that lists his major areas of genius or contribution?Joel Russ 00:30, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Buckminster Fullerene

No mention whatsoever about buckyballs/ buckminster fullerene. -- Jdedmond 20:35, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Now it is mentioned in the second paragraph. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.150.235.107 (talk) 03:45, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

continuous tension discontinuous compression

His first "continuous tension – discontinuous compression" geodesic dome (full sphere in this case) was constructed at the University of Oregon Architecture School in 1959 with the help of students. (Ref: The Dymaxion World of Buckminster Fuller ISBN 0385018045.) These continuous tension – discontinuous compression structures featured single force compression members (no flexure or bending moments) that did not touch each other and were 'suspended' by the tensional members.

What is meant by continuous tension discontinuous compression should be explained. I'd rewrite this if I had any idea what it was trying to say. Maybe a diagram would help? What does it mean they are suspended, they're not actually attached? How can the compression members not touch? What is attached to what? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.150.235.107 (talk) 04:00, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

closest packing of spheres

Their construction is based on extending some basic principles to build simple "tensegrity" structures (tetrahedron, octahedron, and the closest packing of spheres), making them lightweight and stable The parenthetical remark at first seems to be a list of examples of tensegrity structures, then tosses in the bit about "closest packing of spheres". This is confusing, since I doubt that "closest packing of spheres" is an example of a tensegrity structure. I get almost a whiff of what the sentence is intended to convey, maybe that sphere packing is one of the basic principles used.. But since I came here knowing little about Fuller or geodesic domes, I hesitate to swap my wild guess for this incomprehensible sentence. Help me! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.150.235.107 (talk) 04:28, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

I remember the original Earth Day, in Manhattan. I'd been recruited to tie-dye banners to hang from the tall street lamps on Fifth Avenue. Somebody said that we were right upstairs from the headquarters of "Rat", the underground newspaper where the "mad bomber" sent letters predicting where the next bomb would explode. Then, when the day arrived, Bucky came to Columbia to address about 150 people on the concept of spaceship earth. He had peculiar ideas about the filling of space. He argued that using cubes and cubic units to measure space was illogical. I didn't get it. He proposed using another space-filling solid (with square and triangular faces) as a fundamental unit for conceptualizing volume. On the subject of space-filling spheres, he pointed out that a circle could be surrounded by six congruent circles, and they'd all touch their neighbors, so one layer of spheres is perfect, in a way. If you put an identical layer of spheres on top of it, they'd fall into depressions in the first layer, and that would leave out a minimum of volume outside the spheres, or a maximum within them. But when you attempt to add a third layer, things get interesting, because you can place it so the spheres are directly above the ones on the first layer, or you can place it another way. So there's no unique, perfect way to do it. Either way is perfect. [I used to be "Unfree", but I lost my password.] 172.56.26.91 (talk) 09:32, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Article is written in the tone of a fan-site

I added the 'fan-site' template because the article reads like something a Buckminster Fuller museum tour guide might say to museum-goers. The article needs to be rewritten with an eye towards sobriety. J.R. Hercules 02:09, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Why deletion of whole sections??

What was the point of deleting the article's sections on Fuller's Practical Achievements and Major Projects? I moved it to the talk section to ask a question. They are applications of the geodesic dome, and probably should be on that page. If they have to be on this page, can it be a quick paragraph or something? Ieashu (talk) 15:43, 27 June 2013 (UTC) And why (other than the lack of alphabetization or some other system of ordering the titles) was the section on literature about Fuller, his work, and his contributions removed? Joel Russ 14:12, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

I believe there used to be a section about his near suicide, which is crucially important to his next phase in life. This needs to be added back into the wikipedia article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.120.1.64 (talk) 06:51, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Image

The picture of Fuller provided is not the one most people are familiar with (check Google image search to confirm this). In addition, it was taken before he had done anything interesting. I recommend the picture at http://bfi.org/our_programs/who_is_buckminster_fuller

It's well-known and provided by the Buckminster Fuller Institute. I would change it right now, but I wonder if there might be copyright questions. Sonicsuns 05:07, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

You're right that copyright is the problem. The current one is Free, but no license is listed for that image and so we must assume it is proprietary and non-Free. Policy/guideline is that removing Free images in favor of non-Free images is something that just shouldn't happen. --Gwern (contribs) 22:00 17 July 2007 (GMT)

He is hot in that picture tho! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.140.165.216 (talk) 17:35, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Non Sequitors/Strange paragraph about Graham Bell

Taken from the biography secion:

"In 1927 at the age of 32, bankrupt and jobless, living in inferior housing in Chicago, Illinois, Fuller lost his young daughter Alexandra to complications from polio and spinal meningitis. He felt responsible, and this drove him to drink and to the verge of suicide. At the last moment he decided instead to embark on "an experiment, to find what a single individual can contribute to changing the world and benefiting all humanity."

Alexander Graham Bell: actual inventor of the geodesic formula, and physical creation. Bell worked with many geodesic forms and creations, and is the man who first discoverd and developed the physical geodesic shape. Fulled has fully succumbed to the great inventors original position. Bell, as scientisits are aware was a man of vast discovery, creation and invention. Fuller developed the common structural form used for houses and such.

Fuller accepted a position at a small college in North Carolina, Black Mountain College. There, with the support of a group of professors and students, he began work on the project that would make him famous and revolutionize the field of engineering, the geodesic dome. In 1949, he erected the world’s first geodesic dome..."

Just pointing this out.

neckface 63.70.91.229 20:25, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Strange Link

The link on the word "worldview" from the line "Fuller was one of the first to propagate a systemic worldview..." in "Philosophy and worldview" links to an article about a radio show. I'd fix it, but i have no idea how and don't want to destroy anything.

Henry Ford link

Hi I don't actually know how to do this, but under the Dymaxion House section, you mention how there is one on display at the Henry Ford Museum. You should probably have a link to that page. 69.141.55.59 22:48, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Bibliography work and unexplained mass-deletion

I've added a complete bibliography list, based on the 2 sources [2] and [3].

I see there are 2 sections above (#Bibliography needs work and #Why deletion of whole sections??) commenting on the bibliography, and deleted sections, so I searched the history and found:

• this extensive vandalism/deletion that was never fixed.

Hopefully someone can take the time to go through that and re-add whatever is appropriate. Thanks. --Quiddity (talk) 21:32, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

I believe I've restored all the useful things. --Gwern (contribs) 22:22 16 November 2007 (GMT)

Debunked

I removed the reference to the word debunked as a Fuller coinage. This is contradicted by the OED, which assigns the word to W.E. Woodward, 1923, in the book "Bunk," and also by Cassels dictionary http://books.google.com/books?id=YzG9fPXE9AMC&pg=PA41&lpg=PA41&dq=%22William+E+Woodward%22+bunk&source=web&ots=BAKPV1bdA6&sig=CwJOCp_I0pBNbp7Gg-RMMUeG2N4&hl=en - which discusses the word origin in terms of a criticism of Henry Ford, who said, "History is more or less bunk.

In the Fuller archives at http://archives.lib.siu.edu/search.php?creatorid=8 it states "The term debunked is often contradicted to be William Woodward’s invention in 1923, rather than Fuller’s later version in 1927." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.131.50 (talk) 20:45, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Fuller in Context, and Bias

There's little discussion in this article about Buckminster Fuller's work in the wider context. For example: what geodesic domes were in use before Fuller, can it be argued he invented them, what influence did this have on architecture, in which contexts, who upon. Who were his critics, what effect did he have on larger society, what is his legacy?

I'm afraid that this whole article reads like - and is - an idolisation of Fuller with zero critical content, a biased point of view and no discussion of his work in the wider context. Fuller (I am told by the article) wanted to change the path of humanity. Well, did he succeed? To what degree? How? Who with? Why?

This article is seems obviously very, very heavily watched and moderated by those in charge of the Buckminster Fuller Institute, and is in essence a de-facto homepage for their institute. It seems like they wish to create an article that's rose tinted and puts Fuller on a pedestal. I think many of us, though, would like to create an article that tells a whole, critical and useful story about Fuller. 78.86.149.141 (talk) 15:14, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Largest dome

Seagaia Ocean Dome

The article claims that a "Fantasy Entertainment Complex" on "Kyosho Isle" in Japan, measuring 216 m, is the world's largest geodesic dome. The island of Kyushu indeed has the world's largest dome (at one point), the now closed Seagaia Ocean Dome, but it's 300x100x38m and, being elongated in shape, is not a pure geodesic dome. Should it be removed from this list, or at least tagged with a disclaimer? Jpatokal (talk) 04:28, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Earth II and Climatron

I'm including the topics together because they're both mine and to save space. I would like to add a reference to Fuller's Involvment in the made for TV Earth II, which features the Dymaxion map, in which Fuller was given credit as "Technical Advisor for Earth" (although I expect they meant "Earth II"). Anyway, his influence on the political and social landscape of the show are indelible. I'm just not sure which section of the article it should go in.

Also, I think that the Climatron, in the St. Louis Arboretum, deserves a mention, as a significant dome, and one designed by Fuller himself, and will so add it if noone objects. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.243.181.167 (talk) 22:35, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Is there an intentional gap in the history for World War 2?

The history jumps from 1930's to 1948 with occasional mention on his WW2 service?

Is the omission intentional, or has it been purged by vandals and no one noticed? --194.197.79.18 (talk) 10:24, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Discussion of dome, cable intercepts, and Bauersfeld

The text introducing the excerpt on cable intercepts makes does not follow. Is this meant to imply he came upon the idea from Bauersfeld from cable intercepts? If so, this implication is not documented and the text makes no sense anyway. I've been bold and removed it for the time being, perhaps someone can make this point more clearly and with a source...? -Reagle (talk) 14:57, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Geodesic - or Not

Not everything that looks like a dome is necessarily geodesic. Fuller's principles about geodesic lines included specific circles of struts similar to the classical arch for maximum strength. If you look at plans for real Fuller domes, you might be surprised how many different lengths of the struts are used to channel the structural forces in an optimized way.
I haven't yet found out about the Bauersfeld dome, and I can't tell about the rotating animation, but I suspect that both are built in a more economic way, with as little as possible different strut lengths. (Also, as I understood it, the concept of "geodesic" only makes sense in relation to gravity, so a ball spinning in space might be rather pointless.) Similarly that Kyushu dome mentioned above could be something else. I don't know about that.
The biggest geodesic dome was a railway tank car servicing depot in the southern US IIRC. I'll have to look it up again before I can go into more details.
Eden Project is obviously not geodesic: If you trace a line of struts you can't find a single great-circle. I also suspect, that all struts are the same length in any given dome.
Don't understand me wrong: I'm not a "Fuller was the biggest genius ever" fanboy, and I also love Eden Project - but I am an engineer, and I'm trying to get the technical details unmuddled. --BjKa (talk) 14:10, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

A geodesic is a "straightest" possible path in a curved space; on a sphere, a geodesic is a great circle. Nothing to do with gravity, unless we're talking about general relativity (which describes gravity as a curvature of spacetime). —Tamfang (talk) 07:57, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Where's the proof of bankruptcy?

The article says he was bankrupt at 32, but where's the proof that he actually filed for bankruptcy protection? This "bankrupt" claim in Wikipedia has found its way all across the Internet and elsewhere, so don't rely on a circular reference. Being extremely poor or nearly bankrupt is likely more accurate. Here is a high quality reference from The New Yorker magazine, June 9, 2008 http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/06/09/080609fa_fact_kolbert: {{Quote| During the First World War, Fuller married Anne Hewlett, the daughter of a prominent architect, and when the war was over he started a business with his father-in-law, manufacturing bricks out of wood shavings. Despite the general prosperity of the period, the company struggled and, in 1927, nearly bankrupt, it was bought out. At just about the same time, Anne gave birth to a daughter. With no job and a new baby to support, Fuller became depressed. I would like to suggest that regular editors here should consider revising the description to "nearly bankrupt" in the absence of proof with a year. 5Q5 (talk) 15:06, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Whether bankruptcy protection was available or not when Buckminster Fuller was 32 has little to do with his personal financial situation at the time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.120.1.64 (talk) 06:55, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

The book Buckminster Fuller's Universe By Lloyd Steven Sieden claims that Fuller had "no savings to fall back upon" (page 85) after he lost his job with Stockade Building Systems in 1927. Fuller was again "unemployed and with no prospects for supporting himself or his wife". (page 85) "With no steady income the Fuller family was living beyond its means and falling further and further into debt". (page 87). The book doesn't mention him filing for bankruptcy, but it is clear that his financial situation was poor. Stuart mcmillen (talk) 02:34, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Here is a description in his own words [4]--Nowa (talk) 13:30, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Bucky vision of the Internet

I've always thought Buckminster Fuller's idea of individualized two way TV was about the clearest vision of the internet from the 60's.

“...with a few high masts...the entire community could be 'hooked up'...with beam casting you will be able to send individualized messages to each of those houses...it works in both directions....the receiving individual can beam back 'I don't like it'...constant referendum of democracy will be manifest....it is also possible...to send out many different programs simultaneously...children will be able to look up any kind of information they want....The answers to their questions and probing will be the best information that is available up to that minute in history” Education Automation 1962

Does anyone know of any reliable secondary sources that make a similar observation?--Nowa (talk) 15:39, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

To me, this suggests the idea of cellphones, more than the Internet. The Internet doesn't depend on towers, but the interconnectivity of cellphones does. [formerly "Unfree"] 172.56.27.67 (talk) 10:01, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

This would go in the Influences section, but I don't know how to source it.

If you look at the Leon Russel record, Leon Russell and the Shelter People, the liner notes say rather cryptically, "Dear Friends: Here are some better words. -- Find out all you can about Buckminster Fuller Love Leon."

File:Https://s3.amazonaws.com/pamayimmalachim/habifthatme3.jpg

How do you source this?

--75.94.221.254 (talk) 02:55, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Invention of the Geodesic Dome

Other articles in Wikipedia, including the article on Walther Bauersfeld and the Geodesic dome article itself attribute the invention of the geodesic dome to Bauersfeld, more than twenty years before Buckminster Fuller popularized it. I changed the text to say that Fuller popularized the geodesic dome rather than inventing it based on this. It's likely that Fuller was not aware of Bauersfeld's work and thus reinvented it, though I cannot find any sources that speak either way on this.

Bill (talk) 15:01, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

No section on the World Game? Plus, just want to say hello

Huge fan of Bucky and want to help to contribute to this article. I am wondering why there is not a section on the World Game. I also want to say hello to the Bucky editing community here too - before I go in an make any edits or changes. Halfman halfthing (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

I think a world game section would be great. Dive in.--Nowa (talk) 22:00, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Just added a few sentences on the World Game and wikilinked it. I put it under the alternative map projection sub-heading, which I renamed "Dymaxion map and World Game". The two (the map and the World Game) go together, but perhaps each of these developments deserves its own sub-heading?GuineaPigC77 (talk) 07:45, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Plato

It was Plato, I suppose, who came up with the five perfect solids, all of whose sides, faces, and angles are equal. If I recall correctly, they were the (regular) tetrahedron, cube, octahedron, dodecahedron, and icosa[meaning twenty]hedron. Cubes are made up of squares, dodecahedra of pentagons, and the others of equilateral triangles. Since you see pentagons in the pattern of geodesic domes, it occurs to me that they might be elaborations of dodecahedra, in which each pentagon is divvied up into triangles which bulge out to the shape of a sphere. On the other hand, each vertex of an icosahedron is surrounded by five triangles. (Aside from triangles, squares, and pentagons, you can't use any other regular polygons, of course, because regular hexagons fill the plane, and higher-numbered polygons can't come together.) Any thoughts on the matter? What's the right way of conceptualizing Bucky's geodesic spheres? [--formerly "Unfree"] 208.54.85.208 (talk) 09:54, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Eye

There was something about one or both of Bucky's eyes that he said helped him learn how to imagine three-dimensional things better than most people. Was he blind in one eye? Severely myopic? 208.54.85.218 (talk) 10:33, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

"Neo"-Futuristic?

A number of points in this article need attention:

• Why "neo-futuristic"? Why not just "futuristic"?

Frankly, I had not encountered the term "neo-futuristic" before this article. There is a Wiki article titled "neo-futurism", which defines it, in part, as "...an early 21st century movement in the arts, design, and architecture."

Seeing as how Fuller died nearly a quarter century before the advent of the 21st century, it's difficult to see how he could have been a "neo-futurist" according to this definition. One of the two articles needs to be fixed.

• Since Friedrich Fröbel basically originated the modern concept of kindergarten -- all kingergarten -- what does it mean to say that Fuller attended "Froebelian kindergarten"? It just means he attended kindergarten, right? So what? Millions of other kids did, too.

• "Later in life Fuller took exception to the term "invention"." In what way? Why? did he just not like the word for some reason? What reason? Did he propose an alternate? What was it?

• "By his own appraisal, he was a non-conforming misfit in the fraternity environment." This statement jumps in like a non-sequitur. What fraternity? There is no prior mention of fraternities, or of Fuller having been affiliated with any. We are told that he "began studying at Harvard" but plenty of people attend Harvard without joining a fraternity. We are told that he was affiliated with "Adams House," but Adams House is not a fraternity.

• I also note the article refers to Fuller as a "designer". What kind of designer? A fashion designer? Graphic designer? Automotive designer? All kinds? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.249 (talk) 22:46, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Guinea Pig B

I notice that a quote from 'Guinea Pig B' is used near the top of the article, yet Guinea Pig B is mentioned nowhere else on this page (or anywhere else on WP). I think it would be great if 'Guinea Pig B' was added to the bibliography, or perhaps the quote could say that it was originally from the introduction to Fuller's 'Inventions', which is listed in the bibliography, or maybe, since the reference given for the quote is to 'Inventions' and not to 'Guinea Pig B', perhaps the "Guinea Pig B" could just be removed. Thanks! Doctormatt (talk) 22:28, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 9 external links on Buckminster Fuller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071021002639/http://britannica.com:80/ebc/article-9365050 to http://www.britannica.com/ebc/article-9365050
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140419013645/http://www25.uua.org/uuhs/duub/articles/arthurbuckminsterfuller.html to http://www25.uua.org/uuhs/duub/articles/arthurbuckminsterfuller.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130806065007/http://www.harvardsquarelibrary.org:80/unitarians/fuller.html to http://www.harvardsquarelibrary.org/unitarians/fuller.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091010225136/http://www.bfi.org/our_programs/who_is_buckminster_fuller/design_science/eight_strategies_for_comprehensive_anticipatory_design_science to http://www.bfi.org/our_programs/who_is_buckminster_fuller/design_science/eight_strategies_for_comprehensive_anticipatory_design_science
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120824190110/http://bfi.easystorecreator.com/items/books/buckyworks-buckminster-fullers-ideas-for-today-by-j-baldwin-121-detail.htm to http://bfi.easystorecreator.com/items/books/buckyworks-buckminster-fullers-ideas-for-today-by-j-baldwin-121-detail.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130501180303/http://challenge.bfi.org/press/prize_object to http://challenge.bfi.org/press/prize_object
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131502275500/http://www.bfi.org/about-bucky/resources/bibliographic/major-articles-about-fuller to http://www.bfi.org/about-bucky/resources/bibliographic/major-articles-about-fuller
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150813081521/http://www.whitney.org/www/buckminster_fuller/about.jsp to http://www.whitney.org/www/buckminster_fuller/about.jsp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100407000421/http://www.artknowledgenews.com:80/R_Buckminster_Fuller_Starting_with_the_Universe.html to http://www.artknowledgenews.com/R_Buckminster_Fuller_Starting_with_the_Universe.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)