Jump to content

Theory and History: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
}}
}}


'''''Theory and History: An Interpretation of Social and Economic Evolution''''' is a treatise by [[Austrian School|Austrian school]] economist and philosopher [[Ludwig von Mises]]. It can be thought of as a continuation in the development of Mises's system of social science. In particular, it provides further epistomological support for his earlier works, esp. [[Human Action]].
'''''Theory and History: An Interpretation of Social and Economic Evolution''''' is a treatise by [[Austrian School|Austrian school]] economist and philosopher [[Ludwig von Mises]]. It can be thought of as a continuation in the development of the Misesian system of social science. In particular, it provides further [[Epistomology|epistomological]] support for his earlier works, esp. [[Human Action]]. Most notably, Mises elaborates on [[methodological dualism]], develops the concept of [[thymology]] ─ a historical branch of the sciences of human action ─ and presents his critique of Marxist [[Dialectical materialism|materialism]].


In the text Mises analyzes the idea of [[methodological dualism]]: the doctrine that states there are two realms of phenomena each of which must be dealt with separately insofar as there remains an apparent epistomological gulf between them. According to the doctrine, there is, on the one hand, the realm of [[Nature|natural phenomena]] which the [[natural sciences]] deal with and, on the other hand, the realm of human [[Action (philosophy)|action]] which the [[social sciences]] deal with. Mises considers this a [[Methodology|''methodological'']] resort not necessarily a [[Metaphysics|''metaphysical'']] or [[Ontology|''ontological'']] one.<ref>{{cite book |title=Theory and History: An Interpretation of Social and Economic Evolution |last=Mises |first=Ludwig von. |publisher=Ludwig von Mises Institute |year=2007 |isbn=9780865975699 |oclc=167149 |page=1}}</ref> From this Mises elaborates and defends the [[Epistemology|epistemological]] status of economic propositions.
Methodological dualism is an epistomological doctrine that states there are two realms of phenomena each of which must be dealt with separately insofar as there remains an apparent epistomological gulf between them. According to the doctrine, there is, on the one hand, the realm of [[Nature|natural phenomena]] which the [[natural sciences]] deal with and, on the other hand, the realm of [[Action (philosophy)| human action]] which the [[social sciences]] deal with. Mises considers this a [[Methodology|''methodological'']] resort not necessarily a [[Metaphysics|''metaphysical'']] or [[Ontology|''ontological'']] one.<ref>{{cite book |title=Theory and History: An Interpretation of Social and Economic Evolution |last=Mises |first=Ludwig von. |publisher=Ludwig von Mises Institute |year=2007 |isbn=9780865975699 |oclc=167149 |page=1}}</ref> From this Mises elaborates and defends the epistemological status of economic propositions.


Furthermore, Mises puts forward a theory of knowledge and value. He later explores and critically analyzes paradigms of thought like [[determinism]], [[materialism]], [[dialectic materialism]], [[historicism]], [[scientism]], [[positivism]], [[behaviorism]] and [[psychology]]. He argues that these schools of thought ─ some politically motivated<ref name="Theory and History1">''Ibid.'' pp. 26, 134</ref>, others blinded by dogmatism<ref name="Theory and History2">''Ibid.'' pp. 30, 77, 111, 247</ref> ─ have committed epistomological and methodological blunders and are not conducive to a true understanding of human behavior.
Furthermore, Mises puts forward a theory of knowledge and value. He later explores and critically analyzes paradigms of thought like [[determinism]], [[materialism]], [[dialectic materialism]], [[historicism]], [[scientism]], [[positivism]], [[behaviorism]] and [[psychology]]. He argues that these schools of thought ─ some politically motivated<ref name="Theory and History1">''Ibid.'' pp. 26, 134</ref>, others blinded by dogmatism<ref name="Theory and History2">''Ibid.'' pp. 30, 77, 111, 247</ref> ─ have committed epistomological and methodological blunders and are not conducive to a scientific understanding of human behavior.


Economist [[Murray Rothbard]] considered ''Theory and History'' to be Mises's most overlooked work.<ref name="Theory and History6">''Ibid.'' pp. ''xi''-''xix''</ref>
Economist [[Murray Rothbard]] considered ''Theory and History'' to be Mises's most overlooked work.<ref name="Theory and History6">''Ibid.'' pp. ''xi''-''xix''</ref>
Line 32: Line 32:
'''Introduction and Part One ─ Value:'''
'''Introduction and Part One ─ Value:'''


The first part sets the overall theme of the book, introducing the concept of methodological dualism. It then expounds a theory of value that is central throughout. Mises argues that in order to properly ─ scientifically ─ understand human behavior we must attribute volition and purpose to human [[action]]. From this fact, we then proceed to flesh out the logical implications of what is called [[praxeology]].
The first part sets the overall theme of the book with Mises introducing the concept of methodological dualism. He then expounds a theory of value that is central throughout. Regarding his view on science ─ as systematic body of knowledge, of both natural and social phenomena ─ as a means to successful action in the world, Mises argues that in order to properly understand human behavior we must attribute ─ as a methodological resort ─ [[Volition (psychology)|volition]] and [[Teleology|purpose]] to human behaviour. Mises considers this the epistomological and methodological basis of the sciences of human action. The branch that deals with the logical implications of action as such is called [[praxeology]].


'''Part Two ─ Determinism and Materialism:'''
'''Part Two ─ Determinism and Materialism:'''


In the second part, Mises weighs in on the [[free will]] vs. [[determinism]] controversy and comments that the long historical debates did little to settle the problems at hand. He argues that while the natural sciences, in discovering scientific laws, must presuppose a strict regularity in the occurrence of causes and effects, i.e. determinism, such a presupposition cannot be held in the case of human action. He argues further that the social sciences must take [[thought|thoughts]], [[idea|ideas]], and [[value judgment|judgments of value]] as ultimately given in the analysis of human action. Our ignorance of the origins and causes of these phenomena, Mises argues, forces us ─ at least for the time being ─ to adopt a dualistic approach. He contends that attempts to find the origins and causes of these phenomena are vain, as is the task of all varieties of materialism.<ref name="Theory and History3">''Ibid.'' p. 69</ref> Mises then turns his attention to the doctrine of materialism, more specifically, that of Marxist [[Dialectical materialism|dialectical materialism]].
In the second part, Mises weighs in on the [[free will]] vs. [[determinism]] controversy and comments that the long historical debates did little to settle the problems at hand. He argues that while the natural sciences, in discovering scientific laws, must presuppose a strict regularity in the occurrence of causes and effects, i.e. determinism, such a presupposition cannot be held in the case of human action. He argues further that the social sciences must take [[thought|thoughts]], [[idea|ideas]], and [[value judgment|judgments of value]] as ultimately given in the analysis of human action. Our ignorance of the origins and causes of these phenomena, Mises argues, forces us ─ at least for the time being ─ to adopt a dualistic approach. He contends that attempts to find the origins and causes of these phenomena are vain, as is the task of all varieties of materialism.<ref name="Theory and History3">''Ibid.'' p. 69</ref> Mises then turns his attention to the doctrine of materialism, more specifically, that of Marxist dialectical materialism.


'''Part Three ─ Epistomological Problems of History:'''
'''Part Three ─ Epistomological Problems of History:'''
Line 42: Line 42:
The third part deals with the logical and epistomological problems of historical analysis. Mises explains the individualistic character of historical human events. He argues that the historian must ultimately face ─ when tracing back the causal factors behind past human action ─ a point at which no further reduction is possible, i.e. the ideas and actions of individuals. This, he claims, is the "ultimate given of history".<ref name="Theory and History4">''Ibid.'' pp. 183-188</ref> In spite of the individuality of historical events, Mises still insists there are general laws of human behaviour but that they are praxeological laws, i.e. [[A priori and a posteriori|a priori]], not historical laws, i.e. [[A priori and a posteriori|a posteriori]]. However, [[Historicism|historicism]], according to Mises, claimed there were no general laws ─ especially economic laws ─ of human behavior. Mises then enters into a critique of historicism.
The third part deals with the logical and epistomological problems of historical analysis. Mises explains the individualistic character of historical human events. He argues that the historian must ultimately face ─ when tracing back the causal factors behind past human action ─ a point at which no further reduction is possible, i.e. the ideas and actions of individuals. This, he claims, is the "ultimate given of history".<ref name="Theory and History4">''Ibid.'' pp. 183-188</ref> In spite of the individuality of historical events, Mises still insists there are general laws of human behaviour but that they are praxeological laws, i.e. [[A priori and a posteriori|a priori]], not historical laws, i.e. [[A priori and a posteriori|a posteriori]]. However, [[Historicism|historicism]], according to Mises, claimed there were no general laws ─ especially economic laws ─ of human behavior. Mises then enters into a critique of historicism.


Mises also addresses the challenges of [[Scientism|scientism]] in the context of social science, namely the application of [[Positivism|positivism]] and [[Behaviorism|behaviorism]] in the realm of human action. However, more noteworthy is Mises's presentation of [[Thymology|thymology]], a historical branch of the sciences of human action. Mises argues that thymology is what everybody resorts to when trying to [[Verstehen|''understand'']] and anticipate the historical and future actions of his fellow man, and is particularly useful to the historian. He then expounds the scope of thymology and its relation to praxeology.
Mises also addresses the challenges of scientism in the context of social science, namely the application of positivism and behaviorism in the realm of human action. However, more noteworthy is Mises's presentation of [[Thymology|thymology]], a historical branch of the sciences of human action. Mises argues that thymology is what everybody resorts to when trying to [[Verstehen|''understand'']] and anticipate the historical and future actions of their fellow men, and is particularly useful to the historian. He then expounds the scope of thymology and its relation to praxeology.


'''Part Four ─ The Course of History:'''
'''Part Four ─ The Course of History:'''

Revision as of 03:01, 28 August 2015

Theory and History
First edition cover
AuthorLudwig von Mises
Preface by Murray N. Rothbard
LanguageEnglish
SubjectPhilosophy, Methodology, History, Economics
GenreNon-fiction
PublisherYale University Press, Ludwig von Mises Institute
Publication date
1957
Publication placeUnited States
Media typePrint (Hardback & Paperback)
Pages384
ISBN9780865975699
OCLC167149

Theory and History: An Interpretation of Social and Economic Evolution is a treatise by Austrian school economist and philosopher Ludwig von Mises. It can be thought of as a continuation in the development of the Misesian system of social science. In particular, it provides further epistomological support for his earlier works, esp. Human Action. Most notably, Mises elaborates on methodological dualism, develops the concept of thymology ─ a historical branch of the sciences of human action ─ and presents his critique of Marxist materialism.

Methodological dualism is an epistomological doctrine that states there are two realms of phenomena each of which must be dealt with separately insofar as there remains an apparent epistomological gulf between them. According to the doctrine, there is, on the one hand, the realm of natural phenomena which the natural sciences deal with and, on the other hand, the realm of human action which the social sciences deal with. Mises considers this a methodological resort not necessarily a metaphysical or ontological one.[1] From this Mises elaborates and defends the epistemological status of economic propositions.

Furthermore, Mises puts forward a theory of knowledge and value. He later explores and critically analyzes paradigms of thought like determinism, materialism, dialectic materialism, historicism, scientism, positivism, behaviorism and psychology. He argues that these schools of thought ─ some politically motivated[2], others blinded by dogmatism[3] ─ have committed epistomological and methodological blunders and are not conducive to a scientific understanding of human behavior.

Economist Murray Rothbard considered Theory and History to be Mises's most overlooked work.[4]

Synopsis

Mises presents the book in four parts.

Introduction and Part One ─ Value:

The first part sets the overall theme of the book with Mises introducing the concept of methodological dualism. He then expounds a theory of value that is central throughout. Regarding his view on science ─ as systematic body of knowledge, of both natural and social phenomena ─ as a means to successful action in the world, Mises argues that in order to properly understand human behavior we must attribute ─ as a methodological resort ─ volition and purpose to human behaviour. Mises considers this the epistomological and methodological basis of the sciences of human action. The branch that deals with the logical implications of action as such is called praxeology.

Part Two ─ Determinism and Materialism:

In the second part, Mises weighs in on the free will vs. determinism controversy and comments that the long historical debates did little to settle the problems at hand. He argues that while the natural sciences, in discovering scientific laws, must presuppose a strict regularity in the occurrence of causes and effects, i.e. determinism, such a presupposition cannot be held in the case of human action. He argues further that the social sciences must take thoughts, ideas, and judgments of value as ultimately given in the analysis of human action. Our ignorance of the origins and causes of these phenomena, Mises argues, forces us ─ at least for the time being ─ to adopt a dualistic approach. He contends that attempts to find the origins and causes of these phenomena are vain, as is the task of all varieties of materialism.[5] Mises then turns his attention to the doctrine of materialism, more specifically, that of Marxist dialectical materialism.

Part Three ─ Epistomological Problems of History:

The third part deals with the logical and epistomological problems of historical analysis. Mises explains the individualistic character of historical human events. He argues that the historian must ultimately face ─ when tracing back the causal factors behind past human action ─ a point at which no further reduction is possible, i.e. the ideas and actions of individuals. This, he claims, is the "ultimate given of history".[6] In spite of the individuality of historical events, Mises still insists there are general laws of human behaviour but that they are praxeological laws, i.e. a priori, not historical laws, i.e. a posteriori. However, historicism, according to Mises, claimed there were no general laws ─ especially economic laws ─ of human behavior. Mises then enters into a critique of historicism.

Mises also addresses the challenges of scientism in the context of social science, namely the application of positivism and behaviorism in the realm of human action. However, more noteworthy is Mises's presentation of thymology, a historical branch of the sciences of human action. Mises argues that thymology is what everybody resorts to when trying to understand and anticipate the historical and future actions of their fellow men, and is particularly useful to the historian. He then expounds the scope of thymology and its relation to praxeology.

Part Four ─ The Course of History:

In the final part of his treatise, Mises dissects and critiques various speculations and interpretations of history, including a common interpretation of modern Western civilization. He also comments on his observation regarding society's move away from classical liberalism, freedom, and capitalism towards socialism and totalitarianism. Moreover, Mises notes the rising ideology of wealth and income equality and speculates on its origins. He argues that rising anti-capitalistic ideology is fostering a present trend toward the impoverishment of society. He criticizes the notion of society's inevitable "trend toward progress"[7], and argues that the evolution of society and civilization is predicated ─ not on an automatic and inevitable path ─ but on the underlying ideology which can, at any time, change. To this point, Mises closes with some remarks on the uncertainty of the future and the neglect of ideological factors that can give rise to civilization but also stamp it out.

See also

References

  1. ^ Mises, Ludwig von. (2007). Theory and History: An Interpretation of Social and Economic Evolution. Ludwig von Mises Institute. p. 1. ISBN 9780865975699. OCLC 167149.
  2. ^ Ibid. pp. 26, 134
  3. ^ Ibid. pp. 30, 77, 111, 247
  4. ^ Ibid. pp. xi-xix
  5. ^ Ibid. p. 69
  6. ^ Ibid. pp. 183-188
  7. ^ The Alleged Unbroken Trend toward Progress


Stub icon

This article about a philosophy-related book is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Theory_and_History&oldid=678227953"