Jump to content

Talk:Pisa International Airport: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Charter section: PSA doesn't need a charter table
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
RMS52 (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 43: Line 43:


Well, with only theese charter flights a table is surely unnecessary. [[User:Wjkxy|Wjkxy]] ([[User talk:Wjkxy|talk]]) 15:13, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Well, with only theese charter flights a table is surely unnecessary. [[User:Wjkxy|Wjkxy]] ([[User talk:Wjkxy|talk]]) 15:13, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Yes, there should at least be around 50 with seperate airlines to make a table. <span>'''[[User:RMS52|<span style="color:red">RMS52 </span>]] '''<sup>'''[[User talk:RMS52|<span style="color:blue">Talk to me</span>]]'''</sup></span> 15:17, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:17, 29 August 2015

WikiProject iconAviation: Airports Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
B checklist
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the airport project.
WikiProject iconItaly Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name Change

Suggest changing the article name to Pisa Galileo Galilei Airport or simply Galileo Galilei Airport. The word international is neither in its name nor is it commonly used.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Bari International Airport which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RFC bot 21:30, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

new destination

what could be the new destinations that may start at Pisa Airport ? InternationalAirlines (talk) 19:46, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Air dolomiti-lufthansa cityline

@User:RMS52, @@User:Zurich00swiss I noticed that there is a stupid war of edits about the writing "lufthansa regional operated by..." in the table of pasengers flights. Could we decide together how to write this flight? It's ridiculous to see that one day someone writes "operated by lufthansa CityLine and Air Dolomiti" and after a few days this edit is reverted in the original version. Wjkxy (talk) 17:28, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@User:RMS52, @@Wjkxy I say we leave everything as before. if you put together AIR DOLOMITI and LUFTHANSA CITY LINE in PSA you must put together also at MUC.
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 17:44, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • No, it's quite different, because for PSA this is the only lufthansa flight, while Munich is a Lufthansa hub, and there are flights operated by different carriers with LH code. Anyway, I agree with you to keep them separated, like in Malpensa airport page.[1] Wjkxy (talk) 17:48, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Wjkxy In all airports of the world it is so. The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 17:53, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 21:01, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Charter section

Hello I'm writing for ask our opinion about a new section table with charter flight at Pisa International Airport?
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 19:50, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The charter table is not permitted for a lot of airports (like PSA I think). Actually I don't know enough about it, maybe user like RMS52 could give us an answer. Wjkxy (talk) 20:03, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If I was you I'd raise the concern at WT:AIRPORT in order to get some input.--Jetstreamer Talk 00:57, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I@Wjkxy: @Zurich00swiss: It was my understanding that there is not meant to be a charter flight section, since it gets to confusing. You also do not split flights into Regular, Seasonal and charter. I cleaned up Dalaman Airport and instead of 4 sections for flights, now there is only 2.

Well, with only theese charter flights a table is surely unnecessary. Wjkxy (talk) 15:13, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there should at least be around 50 with seperate airlines to make a table. RMS52 Talk to me 15:17, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]