Talk:BitTorrent: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
[[User:CapnZapp|CapnZapp]] ([[User talk:CapnZapp|talk]]) 12:10, 18 March 2015 (UTC) |
[[User:CapnZapp|CapnZapp]] ([[User talk:CapnZapp|talk]]) 12:10, 18 March 2015 (UTC) |
||
I think we could add that, although it may not be a good idea in this article. Some bitTorrent clients have a lot of features, others have the bare minimum. Where should we draw the line? [[User:Jakesyl|Jakesyl]] ([[User talk:Jakesyl|talk]]) 22:43, 3 September 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:43, 3 September 2015
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the BitTorrent article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
|
This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 100 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Relevance of college to article
I reverted this twice and I would prefer to have other feedback before doing so again. I see no relevance to listing Cohen's college in this article at all. It is extremely rare for this to be done (outside of cases like Google where Page & Brin started the search engine at Stanford). Cohen didn't start BitTorrent at Buffalo, didn't receive any assistance/funding/etc. from Buffalo, and didn't even graduate from there. If I'm the only one who thinks this, I will leave it alone but I would like to see other editors opinions on this.Caidh (talk) 12:31, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
bitlove.org
Hey I am unsure if pages like http://bitlove.org/ should be listed in BitTorrent#Broadcasters. I am not sure what the policy is for a listing. bitlove.org functionas as a bittorrent webseed supported tracker for podcasts. --Sk!d (talk) 12:29, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- My apologies - I inadvertently removed your comment on the talk page but I restored it. Sorry about that! Caidh (talk) 19:50, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
the BitTorrent entry is perfectly fine - please don't dumb it down !
it's a really good article - it's clear and precise !
I completely agree, it's perfect how it is. Provides precise information, but simple enough for people with no CS background. Jakesyl (talk) 22:42, 3 September 2015 (UTC)jakesyl
"sequential downloading" section requested!
This topic is in need of attention from an expert on the subject. The section or sections that need attention may be noted in a message below. |
I am talking about certain torrent clients ability to download a small chunk of the file and making that available for consumption (viewing, listening, etc) while more chunks are downloaded, essentially allowing the client to act as if the content was streamed.
I browsed the article but could not find anything on this. I therefore propose that a knowledgeable editor adds a small new section discussing this capability that torrent clients can have. If you object "this isn't part of the torrent specification" then at the very least, add a mention and a link onwards to a dedicated article.
Please note: I am certainly no expert and I'm not even sure what to call this feature. Please improve mercilessly :)
CapnZapp (talk) 12:10, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I think we could add that, although it may not be a good idea in this article. Some bitTorrent clients have a lot of features, others have the bare minimum. Where should we draw the line? Jakesyl (talk) 22:43, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class Computing articles
- Mid-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- C-Class Internet culture articles
- High-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- C-Class Internet articles
- High-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- C-Class software articles
- Unknown-importance software articles
- C-Class software articles of Unknown-importance
- All Software articles
- Old requests for peer review
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press