Jump to content

User:N0n3up/sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cleared infobox
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User sandbox}}
{{User sandbox}}
<!-- EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->

Not all immigrants came from Europe in Ellis island, did you know you also had immigrants from other parts of the old world[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Syrian_Children.jpg ?][http://www.mearo.org/lesson3.php ?][http://zoltanjokay.de/zoltanblog/lewis-hine-immigrants-at-ellis-island-2/ ?][https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/709521/Al-Thani_Mariam_2014Spring.pdf?sequence=1 ?][http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2000-08-17/news/0008170257_1_ellis-island-island-between-1892-powell ?]. The word "European" in the caption narrows a wider concept. It's better to keep it general because keep in mind that people came from all over at that time and it would be imprudent to say that Ellis island was a European-only gateway of immigration because of the major influx of immigrants in the island. Taking away European would sound more fitting due to the uncertainty of the possible origins of immigrants to Ellis island. Yes, there were many immigrants from various parts of Europe but also from other parts outside Europe. Many tend to hear of Europeans in Ellis island and wrongly associated Ellis island as a gateway for European immigration and miss that it also a gateway for other immigrants but due to associations to European immigration, tend to think only about the European immigrants and not other groups, cultures, ethnicity and so on. Mason.Jones reverted my edits only claiming that Ellis island was "''the gateway for EUROPEAN immigrants''". He then went on to blast me in his [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=United_States&type=revision&diff=679020570&oldid=678988319 edit summary] and my [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:N0n3up#United_States talk page]. I presented him my reasons and logic as above to why the redundant "''European''" should be removed. Then Goblez came with the same mentality as Mason.Jones and blasted me in his [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=United_States&type=revision&diff=679371010&oldid=679367551 edit summary] and my [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:N0n3up#Blocked_for_48_hours_for_edit_warring. talk page]. The thing about Goblez is that he says that I lied about a consensus, but we did reach a conclusion when Mason.Jones desisted from providing reasons which made Bishonen send him a [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMason.Jones&type=revision&diff=679130939&oldid=679123252 message] to stop and in regards to my responses. Not to mention Golbez's attitude such as this in the last line of his edit [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGolbez&type=revision&diff=679532954&oldid=679531338 here]. ([[User:N0n3up|N0n3up]] ([[User talk:N0n3up|talk]]) 19:52, 6 September 2015 (UTC))

Revision as of 19:52, 6 September 2015

Not all immigrants came from Europe in Ellis island, did you know you also had immigrants from other parts of the old world?????. The word "European" in the caption narrows a wider concept. It's better to keep it general because keep in mind that people came from all over at that time and it would be imprudent to say that Ellis island was a European-only gateway of immigration because of the major influx of immigrants in the island. Taking away European would sound more fitting due to the uncertainty of the possible origins of immigrants to Ellis island. Yes, there were many immigrants from various parts of Europe but also from other parts outside Europe. Many tend to hear of Europeans in Ellis island and wrongly associated Ellis island as a gateway for European immigration and miss that it also a gateway for other immigrants but due to associations to European immigration, tend to think only about the European immigrants and not other groups, cultures, ethnicity and so on. Mason.Jones reverted my edits only claiming that Ellis island was "the gateway for EUROPEAN immigrants". He then went on to blast me in his edit summary and my talk page. I presented him my reasons and logic as above to why the redundant "European" should be removed. Then Goblez came with the same mentality as Mason.Jones and blasted me in his edit summary and my talk page. The thing about Goblez is that he says that I lied about a consensus, but we did reach a conclusion when Mason.Jones desisted from providing reasons which made Bishonen send him a message to stop and in regards to my responses. Not to mention Golbez's attitude such as this in the last line of his edit here. (N0n3up (talk) 19:52, 6 September 2015 (UTC))