Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abilis Solutions: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''Delete''': Fails [[WP:CORP]]. [[User:Vrac|Vrac]] ([[User talk:Vrac|talk]]) 18:26, 29 August 2015 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''': Fails [[WP:CORP]]. [[User:Vrac|Vrac]] ([[User talk:Vrac|talk]]) 18:26, 29 August 2015 (UTC) |
||
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /> |
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /> |
||
< |
<smallPlease add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —[[WP:☮|<font color="Green ">☮</font>]][[User:Jaaron95|<font color="CornflowerBlue" face="Times">'''JAaron95'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jaaron95|<font color="Green" face= "Times">Talk</font>]]</sup> 06:13, 5 September 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Abilis Solutions]]</div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
||
*'''Delete.''' non notable company. The analysis in the nomination seems correct to me. '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 00:55, 10 September 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:55, 10 September 2015
- Abilis Solutions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
My searches found nothing aside from press releases and other minor coverage here, here, here and here (searches at Montreal Gazette, browser and CBC found nothing). I was also happening to notice this has stayed since November 2008 and, although it has been edited since, it has not been significant improvement thus less chances why to keep longer. SwisterTwister talk 07:01, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:02, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:02, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:02, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails WP:CORP. Vrac (talk) 18:26, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
<smallPlease add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 Talk 06:13, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
<smallPlease add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 Talk 06:13, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. non notable company. The analysis in the nomination seems correct to me. DGG ( talk ) 00:55, 10 September 2015 (UTC)