User talk:Shadhilli: Difference between revisions
→Our conflict of interest policy: new section |
|||
Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
:: [[User:Shadilli]], you do not have the right to decide for yourself which Wikipedia guidelines you will follow and which you will ignore. You have provided no evidence to support your claim that anyone is endangered by the information you keep removing. You must desist. [[User:GorgeCustersSabre|George Custer's Sabre]] ([[User talk:GorgeCustersSabre|talk]]) 15:47, 10 September 2015 (UTC) |
:: [[User:Shadilli]], you do not have the right to decide for yourself which Wikipedia guidelines you will follow and which you will ignore. You have provided no evidence to support your claim that anyone is endangered by the information you keep removing. You must desist. [[User:GorgeCustersSabre|George Custer's Sabre]] ([[User talk:GorgeCustersSabre|talk]]) 15:47, 10 September 2015 (UTC) |
||
:i am not trying to ignore or follow certain guidelines, i am trying to ensure the page is beneficial whilst respecting the children and his wife right to privacy and safety. If you haven't read the page perhaps you should review who the Shaykh is speaking against and maybe then you will have an idea why their safety and privacy is important i don't really know how to make things clearer. |
|||
==Your recent edits== |
==Your recent edits== |
Revision as of 15:53, 10 September 2015
Welcome!
|
Shadhilli, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
Hi Shadhilli!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:33, 7 September 2015 (UTC) |
September 2015
Hello, I'm KSFT. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Muhammad al-Yaqoubi with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KSFTC 22:26, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Other shaykhs do not have their personal life shared so there is no reason to share Shaykh Muhammads, there is nothing wrong with the content, in itself but the marital status and number of children including their names is not relevant. It is not of public interest or benefit, in the past Shaykhs families and their children have never been exposed so why now. Please respect mostly their privacy and their security. Sincerest regards. User:Shadilli
September 2015
Your recent editing history at Muhammad al-Yaqoubi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war, and violated the three-revert. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Justice007 (talk) 14:47, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Other shaykhs do not have their personal life shared so there is no reason to share Shaykh Muhammads, there is nothing wrong with the content, in itself but the marital status and number of children including their names is not relevant. It is not of public interest or benefit, in the past Shaykhs families and their children have never been exposed so why now. Please respect mostly their privacy and their security. Sincerest regards. User:Shadilli
- User:Shadilli, you do not have the right to decide for yourself which Wikipedia guidelines you will follow and which you will ignore. You have provided no evidence to support your claim that anyone is endangered by the information you keep removing. You must desist. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 15:47, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- i am not trying to ignore or follow certain guidelines, i am trying to ensure the page is beneficial whilst respecting the children and his wife right to privacy and safety. If you haven't read the page perhaps you should review who the Shaykh is speaking against and maybe then you will have an idea why their safety and privacy is important i don't really know how to make things clearer.
Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:15, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Oh ok thank you very much. shadhilli
Our conflict of interest policy
Hello, Shadhilli. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest.
Editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. If you have a conflict of interest, please:
- avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with (see WP:COI);
- avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:52, 10 September 2015 (UTC)