Wikipedia:Training/For students/Leave feedback: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 06:55, 13 September 2015

Training feedback Ansel.borhauer (talk)

What I liked

The videos and the interactive training are great teaching tools.

What I didn't like

I feel like there could be more activities for the training rather than a quick run through.

What was missing

Explanation of the signature, I didn't think it just to be the tildes, I thought I had to write my name in.

What was unnecessary

Nothing really, it all seemed appropriate.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

It was great, Wish there was more.

--Ansel.borhauer (talk) 01:52, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Great videos explaining details, if you have basic HTML knowledge it ends up being managable

What I didn't like

I wish there were more sections where you could test out how to use the information give

What was missing

What i stated above for uploading photos

What was unnecessary

What makes a good article

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

It was good, took some getting used to but overall it was very helpful.

--Jamesjohnson3 (talk) 01:58, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... the interactive part

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Lozmeister (talk) 02:57, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Helped me get a better understanding of how wikipedia works behind the scenes

What I didn't like

... Some common knowledge presented that was unnecessary

What was missing

... nothing

What was unnecessary

... simple common things anyone with knowledge of wikipedia and writing skills should know

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... I did not try it

--Scienceguy21 (talk) 03:33, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... the videos explaining and showing content.

What I didn't like

... a lot of reading

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Psych2015 (talk) 19:30, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... the interactive part

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

... more activities where we try each thing ourselves rather than just watch an informational video

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... it was very useful

--Jjp73 (talk) 02:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

The incorporation of videos throughout the tutorials.

What I didn't like

I thought the interactive editing tutorial could be improved.

What was missing

What was unnecessary

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I thought the tutorial was short but to the point. It had some issues/bugs but it was still effective.

--Kkg123 (talk) 03:22, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

The broad overview.

What I didn't like

Maybe it could have been a little more specific.

What was missing

More real examples of how to do things.

What was unnecessary

The lecture on who other people on Wikipedia are.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Neat.

--Vrastall (talk) 03:48, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

I loved the interactive editing tutorials; they were very helpful. I liked the overall tutorial

--COV Western (talk) 03:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... The videos were very helpful and not too long

What I didn't like

... Very wordy and sometimes hard to follow.

What was missing

... Everything seemed to be covered.

What was unnecessary

... All the words, visuals would be better, like pictures as well as the videos.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...It was hard to follow because sometimes they way you clicked the order of the buttons in the tutorial, it would take you out of the tutorial and then you couldn't get back into the tutorial unless you started over from the beginning.

--Katelynn.cox (talk) 06:18, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: Very simple to navigate

...

What I didn't like: I got stuck on the citation part of the tutorial, after completing what it said to do it still did not work.

...

What was missing: Nothing i could tell, however this is new for me.

...

What was unnecessary: Nothing

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Very helpful I need hands on training so it was great

...

--Tgoodkey (talk) 20:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

The information and videos were quite thoroughly beneficial. ...

What I didn't like

... Nothing.

What was missing

... Nothing.

What was unnecessary

...Nothing

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... I think it was very educational. Gave me a new view of Wikipedia.

--StanLeehen (talk) 01:40, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... The videos were very helpful!

What I didn't like

...The text, videos, and tutorials seemed a bit redundant... Maybe get rid of one of them.

What was missing

... Nothing

What was unnecessary

... As I said earlier, the three forms of portraying the same information was a bit redundant.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... I found it very helpful.

--Semaj311 (talk) 21:02, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... Very helpful and straightforward. I liked that it gave links to find other resources without including an excessive amount of information in the training.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Deitkm (talk) 02:04, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... The interactive editing tutorial and how straightforward the training was.

What I didn't like

... Pressing X on the interactive sandbox tutorials caused the helpful hints to stop. popping up

What was missing

... Nothing; all of the main components seemed to be there. The information presented seemed to be adequate enough for a beginner to understand the basics.

What was unnecessary

... Nothing; the tutorial was to the point.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... I like it, but my concern was with exiting the hints. When pressing the arrow, the tutorial continues but when you click X it stops. It was hard to find my place in the tutorial afterwards and I felt a bit lost until I gave up and restarted it, realizing that I shouldn't press X. Besides that, I think the tutorial was helpful with my first user experience with Wikipedia.

--ChipsAndChopsticks (talk) 08:09, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...How comprehensive the training was!

What I didn't like

...It was kind of difficult to navigate when the pages took me out of the training modules.

What was missing

...nothing!

What was unnecessary

...nothing!

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...best part!

--Chandlerbuchanan (talk) 15:01, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: The step by step tutorials.

...

What I didn't like: There was nothing that I did not like.

...

What was missing: I believe that there was nothing missing.

...

What was unnecessary: There was nothing that I thought was unnecessary.

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?I thought that it was very helpful rather than reading.

...

--Buchaly15 (talk) 19:36, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: I liked the videos provided!--21:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

...

What I didn't like: too much text involved, maybe words should complement the videos--21:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

...

What was missing: someway to train and edit while completing the editorial--Luisq15 (talk) 21:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

...

What was unnecessary: The links taking me away from training--21:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Overall it helped me dramatically!--Luisq15 (talk) 21: 26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

...

--Luisq15 (talk) 21:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

The interactive tutorials

What I didn't like

The text instructions will probably be forgotten soon. I learned much more when having to edit using the tutorial than reading about editing.

What was missing

More interactive tutorials would be great!

What was unnecessary

-

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

It was great. More of this would, rather than videos/text instruction would help.

--Btw777 (talk) 22:16, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: visual interaction

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

live interactive typing examples of editing, such as the user being able to type along with the tutorial to try some things

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Altb478 (talk) 22:34, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

…easy to navigate

What I didn't like

…when you clicked the links you couldn't get back to where you left off

What was missing

…N/A

What was unnecessary

…N/A

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

…I didn't know how to get back to page I was on without starting over

--Spidey1994 (talk) 01:06, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: Simple, easy to follow

...

What I didn't like: Videos rely on java.

...

What was missing: Nothing really, serves the purpose of an intro

...

What was unnecessary: I didn't feel the videos added anything to the training, seemed a bit repetitive of the text.

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Did not try it.

...

--Veterinarydreams (talk) 03:39, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: it had some humor embedded in the instruction

...

What I didn't like: it was quiet lengthy, and it would not be possible to memorize everything on the spot anyways.

...

What was missing: I think it would be helpful to have a demo as the person actually works through for the first time.

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? i liked it better than just reading about it. But based on size of your window, you are sometimes unable to click the links that you want to move on to the next step.

...

--Jukaredaa (talk) 05:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Othrowt (talk) 06:05, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... Clear and Concise tutorial about how to Edit Wikipedia Articles, Also liked the interactive tutorials along the way giving a chance to practice making edits.

What I didn't like

... Loved it all

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... Really helpful feature, favorite part of the entire process.

--VarunS93 (talk) 19:26, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

The tutorial was very simple and it really helped me see what goes into making articles and edits. ...

What I didn't like

Sometimes the box that shows the progress was in the way of what I did so I could not see if it was correct. ...

What was missing

I cannot think of anything ...

What was unnecessary

Nothing ...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

It was awesome ...

--Rgirar1 (talk) 03:52, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...I liked the step-by-step tutorials in module 3

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Caitlinmcgrath (talk) 04:26, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...I like because is very fun new things

What I didn't like

...i really like all

What was missing

...nothing

What was unnecessary

...nothing

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Jangola27 (talk) 04:27, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

…I like that each part of the training was well organized and concise. I thought the train gin was extremely in depth and well though out. Each step of editing was addressed.

What I didn't like

…I did not like how long the train took. It took me about 2.5 hours to finish this and I don't remember a lot of what I learned because the process was so lengthy.

What was missing

…I know it was training, but it was extremely morning and it took all my brain power to focus for only a few minutes.

What was unnecessary

…The readings were uneasy when a video was posted that explained the exact same thing. i though the videos were the most helpful part of the process.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

…The interactive tutorial was ok, I did not try it for very long but I though it was helpful in understanding the editing process.

--LLP210 (talk) 05:15, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

The training was engaging and I did not get bored.

What I didn't like

It was hard to find the training.

What was missing

What was unnecessary

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

well thought out and good

--Tmartin3576 (talk) 07:32, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

The videos helped give a visual example to the process of code.

What I didn't like

Nothing

What was missing

 Maybe more examples of how to use the code

What was unnecessary

 Nothing

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

 It was good for practicing how to do everything.

--MeganMcIlvenna (talk) 14:54, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--LiRuiQing (talk) 19:04, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Xiaoxuxu0313 (talk) 19:25, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: very informative

...

What I didn't like: The interactive editing tool had an X button that blocked words, and was annoying at times

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--ArjunChawla175 (talk) 00:05, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

This training was very informative and helped lay out the specifics in creating your on wiki page.

What I didn't like

Some things were still a little difficult to understand, such as citations and how to include pictures with the correct format, however, I know we will be discussing more and more of these topics in class and with a librarian so I feel as though I will understand more of what is expected after doing so.

What was missing

I didn't feel as though anything was missing.

What was unnecessary

Everything in this training was necessary and was definitely needed in order to make a successful wiki page.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I did not try the interactive editing tutorial, but based off what it said it is going to be useful to have and getting other peoples opinions and feedback on things is what will help you become a better writer. Just remember to not take anything personally because it is all for our benefit.

--Kcabral18 (talk) 15:50, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... The videos and the helpful modules where you were actually using the programs helped a lot

What I didn't like

... Some of the information seemed redundant or repeated

What was missing

... Not Much

What was unnecessary

... Repeated information

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... Friggin awesome --AGSPianoMan (talk) 16:36, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

very informative, especially the editing

What I didn't like

It doesn't say where the information can be accessed in the future.

What was missing

Nothing, it was thorough

What was unnecessary

Definitely, and helpful.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Very helpful

--Enthusiast006 (talk) 00:04, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--X-pert Dreamer (talk) 19:22, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: the videos were clear

...

What I didn't like: I find coding difficult

...

What was missing: Nothing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It helped me understanding

...

--GiuliaBalsamo (talk) 20:02, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: Easy and quick to work through

...

What I didn't like: Lack of videos

...

What was missing: More videos

...

What was unnecessary: Too much information about the community

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? n/a

...

--MariaCabrera23 (talk) 22:36, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...Detailed explanation on every point. Well organized helpful information.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--SlavicaZ3 (talk) 15:23, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

All of the useful information

What I didn't like

I would like the option to advance to the next page with keyboard shortcuts

What was missing

Nothing!!

What was unnecessary

Nothing!!

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Very Helpful! --KTB123english (talk) 16:25, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Very concise and relevant. Videos were short and very helpful.

What I didn't like

Some of the instructions had grammatical errors.

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Very useful to actually do the editing rather than just read about it.

--Zchen373 (talk) 20:12, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Bellre (talk) 20:51, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

The interactive portion and the videos.

What I didn't like

I didn't like all the information that did not include interactive portions.

What was missing

I can't think of anything that was missing.

What was unnecessary

Learning communication skills to use when talking with others on Wikipedia.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I think it was very helpful.

Training feedback

What I liked

Very interactive.

What I didn't like

Overly extensive.

What was missing

no

What was unnecessary

The advanced editing section

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

useful

--Wiggins jake (talk) 20:53, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

Very informative, and had lots of helpful videos

What I didn't like

...

Constant reiteration of the same things

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Ehylemon (talk) 23:34, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: The interactive editing training.

...

What I didn't like: Some aspects could have been a little more thorough.

...

What was missing: A handout displaying each step of the editing process.

...

What was unnecessary: The videos.

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? They were very helpful

...

--Krb45698 (talk) 07:37, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...There was detailed step by step instructions to follow which made it easier to practice. I also enjoyed actually submitting editing which will help me when I embark on the wiki page project.

What I didn't like

... There were lots of clips through the tutorial which I was unable to listen to due to being in a classroom with other students. This could have been disruptive to others. If I had known in advance I could have brought some headphones.

What was missing

...N/A

What was unnecessary

...N/A

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I have enjoyed the tutorial as it gives me the hands on experience of editing the page and attempting other tasks relevant to the use of wikipedia.

--Victoria Mealor (talk) 10:38, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... I liked how thorough the training was and how helpful all the tips are.

What I didn't like

... My videos not working.

What was missing

... Maybe more pictures rather than videos.

What was unnecessary

... The confusing graphs and charts.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... I thought it was great and incredibly helpful.

--Laurendiaz (talk) 21:30, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: it was very informative a lot information liked the links and practice in the sandbox

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary: the java links

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I liked them they worked very well and were very straight forward and helpful

...

--RERoyal (talk) 02:05, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... The amount of information.

What I didn't like

... The amount of information.

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Oklamert (talk) 02:31, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... Informative and helpful with most sections that included a video tutorial

What I didn't like

...The structure of bracketing, coding and reference points, but I guess that will come with time and repetition. The coding seems overwhelming at first.

What was missing

...Perhaps a few more tutorial videos and some try it out and apply examples.

What was unnecessary

...All necessary

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I thought it was very helpful. I would of liked to seen more for all parts of training.

--Djac88 (talk) 03:40, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

The tutorial is pretty thorough and answered a lot of my initial questions.

What I didn't like

There is a lot of information, which means I will have to look up a lot of this information again in the future.

What was missing

I can't think of anything that was missing.

What was unnecessary

I thought the "advanced" section was misnamed, not unnecessary. The advanced section was more along the lines of random bits of information. The only thing that felt advanced was the "Adding images and other media" slide.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I liked the interactive editing tutorial, it allowed me to test my knowledge and make sure I understood what was explained.

--Jessemcmanus (talk) 04:12, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...The training was short and relatively simple.

What I didn't like

...The videos were full of fluff

What was missing

...More simple practice tutorials

What was unnecessary

...The length of some of the videos

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Trevorcallarman (talk) 05:56, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...I liked the videos because they showed how to do things on the pages themselves.

What I didn't like

...The descriptions of how to use the different codes were confusing.

What was missing

...I think everything was covered or there was a link to how to learn more about whatever was missing.

What was unnecessary

...I think everything was necessary

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--KMFischer (talk) 06:19, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

I liked how the directions were very precise. ...

What I didn't like

...I often thought it was complicated.

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary: Everything was important.

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...It was pretty difficult.

--Jaimev10 (talk) 14:48, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...Specific information and structure.

What I didn't like

...The video need to download (probably my own problem).

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Axingmayra (talk) 16:48, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: The review process is great.

...

What I didn't like

...There is lot to learn

What was missing

... more video and less issues streaming through my computer. I review the video on-line using you tube.

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... there were good

--AbeBasicUnit12358 (talk) 18:20, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Videos

What I didn't like

length

What was missing

a single video explaining all of it

What was unnecessary

editing

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

good, but needed more videos

--Yuskhawas (talk) 14:29, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...I liked how it was set up into four modules. It made it easier to comprehend.

What I didn't like

... It was a bit long, but I know it was necessary.

What was missing

...I haven't ran across anything just yet.

What was unnecessary

...Everything seemed pretty relevant.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...It worked well and really helped me! The only issue I had with it was that if I wanted to go back and edit it I couldn't move forward through the training afterwards and it took me a while to get back to where I left off.

--Agray5 (talk) 19:39, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: Step by step directions

...

What I didn't like: leaving page for videos

...

What was missing: Nothing

...

What was unnecessary: Yes

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Ryanbeddes (talk) 07:07, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

everything!

What I didn't like

nothing!

What was missing

nothing, very informative!

What was unnecessary

nothing!

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I did not try it

--KTB123COD (talk) 16:28, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...Very thorough and easy to understand! The interactive helped me a lot and the videos were great too.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Rlira123 (talk) 19:47, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...The casual tone of the text

What I didn't like

...Nothing!

What was missing

...Maybe add some more graphics

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I thought it was useful, but it was tough to navigate back to the page I was originally on.

--Tartancircus (talk) 20:24, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Straight forward. Easy to understand. Very thorough

What I didn't like

Should be a timer on each page ensuring each page has been completed

What was missing

a timer

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Stephalkidis (talk) 23:13, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Video tutorials

What I didn't like

repetition

What was missing

Content was sufficient.

What was unnecessary

Repetition

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

The tutorial helped me understand.

--Sean.Chris95 (talk) 22:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...the interactive links

What I didn't like

...the long explanations

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...worked very well and was useful

--ZarathustraSay20 (talk) 13:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)ZarathustraSay20[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...The tutorial was very informative for how to edit a wikipedia article.

What I didn't like

...The tutorial was very wordy at times and there was some irrelevant information that just made the tutorial longer.

What was missing

...nothing

What was unnecessary

...some parts were boring and unnecessary

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... It helped a lot with learning how to use wikipedia. --Cstauch1 (talk) 02:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Texidor94 (talk) 04:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...the videos were convenient.

What I didn't like

...Some of the slides were redundant.

What was missing

...more help for people who don't quite understand codes for adding pictures and other media.

What was unnecessary

...I don't think any was completely unnecessary.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I did not try it.

--AnthCulturee (talk) 06:15, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

The videos were used well.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--EncycloMan2 (talk) 19:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Sandbox section was new to me. Also, the information about VisualEditor was great. (Loving VisualEditor very much.) Nice videos made by users!

What I didn't like

The tutorial assumed I was a beginner. It would have been nice if some script at the beginning parsed my username to "intelligently" provide me a tutorial tailored to my likely ignorance based on my contributions.

What was missing

An example of an editorial disagreement that was amicably resolved using Talk among users.

What was unnecessary

I only needed a small fraction of the tutorial.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

It was great except that I kept getting interrupted by the message that I am not a recognized, verified contributor to Wikipedia. Then, when I pursued this latter message, the editing tutorial messages followed onto the pages for getting recognized.

--Mavaddat (talk) 02:50, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

It was concise and efficient. The interactive tutorials had no bugs and were quite helpful and informative. The specialized section at the end for editing medical articles was especially helpful.

What I didn't like

Nothing.

What was missing

See above.

What was unnecessary

Nothing.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Very helpful and complete.

Training feedback

What I liked

...Is how detailed the Training was.

What I didn't like

...Is that I had some computer issues with some of the videos and so I had to skip some of them.

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--KJames94 (talk) 21:42, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... The videos and descriptions were easy to follow and very informative.

What I didn't like

...The training was rather long and somewhat repetitive.

What was missing

...Nothing, I found it very comprehensive (perhaps a bit TOO much...).

What was unnecessary

...I feel like the plagiarism details were self-explanatory.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--ExpressElevatortoHell (talk) 03:06, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... I liked the fact that the tutorial was done with in a timely matter.

What I didn't like

... I felt like I could've used a little more information on the articles that I'd be editing.

What was missing

... A little more information about the content that I'm to edit.

What was unnecessary

... No Comment.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... I found the tutorial extremely helpful, and useful. I now know how some of the tools work. --Cassidypj (talk) 17:02, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

Nothing was missing, everything was great. ...

What was unnecessary

In my opinion, everything was perfectly explained. Everything was necessary. ...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Shirley Jusino (talk) 14:36, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Bauyrzhanabuov (talk) 00:52, 27 February 2015 (UTC) The process of getting the certificate is quite complicated.Bauyrzhanabuov (talk) 00:52, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

The tutorials and the videos really showed how to do everything and the explanations explained why.

What I didn't like

The videos were slow.

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

There was a lot of common sense about how to interact with other people on the site.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

It's very helpful

--Christinabillias (talk) 21:24, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...It is an in-depth and informative training.

What I didn't like

...It could have been simplified a little and took a long time to complete.

What was missing

...I don't think it was missing anything.

What was unnecessary

...The length of the modules may have been to long.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...The interactive editing tutorial was very helpful in explaining how to use the editing tools.

--Rkuklok (talk) 21:59, 2 March 2015 (UTC)rkuklok[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... I enjoyed the thoroughness of the training and the information that it gave me.

What I didn't like

... There wasn't anything I didn't enjoy.

What was missing

... I think I got all the basics form the training.

What was unnecessary

... Nothing, it is all important for using wikipedia.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... I did not try. --Rmosiervt (talk) 00:07, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...Most of it

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...A description of how to set up different sandboxes, and links to them, right after first introducing sandboxes. As a new user, I appreciate the more_markup sandbox as a training and reference, and wanted to be able to set up a link to it right away. I figured out how to do that, but not through the tutorial.

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...Good, except it didn't allow you to go return to a step if you accidentally skipped it. Had to finish then start over and click thru to the step I missed.

--Radeachar (talk) 16:46, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...simple, clean, informative: written words accompanying spoken video

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... helpful

--Hotgardener (talk) 16:52, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Mmcluckie (talk) 21:21, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: clear wording and easy to understand

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Sspen138 (talk) 21:50, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... clear, simple

What I didn't like

...boring, especially the videos which are dull and painfully slow-paced

What was missing

...nothing

What was unnecessary

...how to give wikilove. general slow pace

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...n/a

--Mcelroys (talk) 04:33, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Hay weyer (talk) 08:19, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...Good videos

What I didn't like

...Bad interactive aspect

What was missing

...Easier interactive process

What was unnecessary

...Nothing

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...It was confusing and hard to do because the tutorial didnt show how to do the requested actions very well.

--Amohamed2526 (talk) 21:12, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...videos inserted broke up tedium

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I got stuck a couple of times for various reasons. Clicking the X at the top of the dialog box seemed to stop the interactive tutorial rather than just close the box.

--MsTCason (talk) 22:13, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: I liked that wikipedia requires people to shows both sides of any claim in an article instead of giving one opinion.

...

What I didn't like: That any one can edit a source without having any education or experties in a subject

...

What was missing

...It would nice to have more information in rules for copyright.

What was unnecessary

... The information was to basic in the orientation.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... It was a good source to obtain information.

--EDgan7 (talk) 06:35, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... I appreciated the relative brevity of the training.

What I didn't like

... I do not think most people will be able to absorb that amount of basic coding in one training session, that may require additional training or editing controls.

What was missing

... Possibly a downloadable formatting/coding reference.

What was unnecessary

... N/A

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... I enjoyed the fact that the program follows your progress and gives you the ability to make mistakes and try again.

--Anationmaritime (talk) 09:55, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...I liked everything. Especially the videos that were included.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Kimfrancissalles (talk) 20:00, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Everything was straight forward and helpful.

What I didn't like

It took a long time.

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

It was very helpful to fully understand how to do things.

--Carolynnt (talk) 16:20, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...I thought everything was explained very well.

What I didn't like

...The website is very confusing with a lot of "ins and outs".

What was missing

...I thought there should have been more tutorial videos. Those helped me out the most.

What was unnecessary

...Some of the "slides" were a little too wordy and hard to follow

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I loved it! It helped me tremendouslyMet2812 (talk) 20:50, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--Met2812 (talk) 20:50, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--CMATSGB (talk) 19:56, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: The simplified text and videos, that helped get me through this.

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Theresa L Gregory (talk) 01:10, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

The training was descriptive and helpful. I really enjoyed the tutorials in the editing section

What I didn't like

Sometimes the descriptions were a little wordy

What was missing

Certain criteria that get an article deleted

What was unnecessary

I found everything necessary

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Again, I found it very helpful but could use some more direction

--Elly7677 (talk) 01:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Tutorial covered a range of topics and videos helped make explanations clearer

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

Was pretty comprehensive, and can't think of anything in particular that I disliked or still need to know

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Editing tutorial was probably the most helpful part. It gave me a chance to practice useful wikicode and actively learn the ropes.

--Meganhumburg (talk) 03:10, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

It was straight and to the point

What I didn't like

There was a lot of technical things that were hard to grasp

What was missing

Maybe a tad more pictures and diagrams

What was unnecessary

The videos that didn't work

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

n/a

--Indyaudri (talk) 04:18, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback from Communist-party-van

What I liked

I appreciated how academic the introduction was. Frankly, it was a bit surprising to see such a collegiate course-type module on the site. It reminded me of some of the less-than-thrilling alcohol education modules we have to take, but instead of being a bore, it was kind of fun to receive one from Wikipedia.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--[communist party van] (talk) 07:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...All of the steps were clearly described, to the point, and were separated into easily digestible portions.

What I didn't like

...The audio on some of the videos was of poor quality.

What was missing

...I think everything was covered pretty well.

What was unnecessary

...It was short enough, no need to cut stuff out.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...As expected, not bad, not great.

--DWBCoding (talk) 19:24, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--AlphaMaleMcBrowski (talk) 19:36, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Interactive editing tutorial, Videos.

What I didn't like

Module 3 is slightly long.

What was missing

Better links within the interactive editing tutorial, as it is still rather glitchy.

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Useful as it allows us to practise what we have just learnt.

--ABonheur (talk) 10:46, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: great descriptions

...

What I didn't like: hard to return to sections

...

What was missing: would have liked more pictures

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Pskellerstudent (talk) 18:28, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

*The interactive editing tutorial, the simplicity of the way it was written.

What I didn't like

*N/A

What was missing

*There should be more interactive editing tutorials.An easier to read and understand list of wikicodes would be helpful.

What was unnecessary

*N/A

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

*IT WAS GREAT!

--ZulaikhaN (talk) 11:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Very thorough and user friendly experience.

What I didn't like

Navigation back to training page is hard.

What was missing

Maybe a final 'project' at the end requiring the user to edit an article with requirements would be good.

What was unnecessary

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

The step by step approach was useful and easy to understand.

--Kua Wei Qi Wendy (talk) 10:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: Great interactive tutorials that really helped in the process of learning wiki code.

...

What I didn't like: Videos didn't play properly on Safari.

...

What was missing: NA

...

What was unnecessary: NA

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was my favorite part!

...

--Hai jatai (talk) 18:20, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

The training was straightforward, and I really liked the guided practice for editing.

What I didn't like

A lot of it felt redundant, because it felt like common sense when it was said the first time, and then you had me watch a video about it, and I started to feel like it was wasting my time.

What was missing

I can't think of anything that was missing, but I think it would be nice if you could have a guided editing practice that you could go back to even after the training was finished and that you could keep going back to if you want to practice certain things, just so you can practice and check your work.

What was unnecessary

The "edit" video that was about the edit button seemed a little pointless. If I'm taking this training, I'm probably already interested in editing a page, so adding a little promo for editing seemed excessive.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

This was the best part of the module, in my opinion. Because I am already familiar with academic writing, plagiarism, and common courtesy, a lot of this training seemed like common sense, to me, but the editing tutorial was really helpful and gave me a lot of confidence that I could figure out how to edit an article, if I want to.

--SKPsych237 (talk) 21:14, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...Interactive tutorials and short videos

What I didn't like

...Not enough hands on

What was missing

...Pictures

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...It provides a first hand guided assistance. Allowing us to be familiarised with the steps to editing

--StevenZHMH (talk) 07:07, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

I liked the videos, they were short but very informative.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

very easy to use and very helpful

--Matthews8978 (talk) 20:51, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

I liked how there were videos to give better explanations of how to do something on Wikipedia.

What I didn't like

What I didn't like is that some of the information seemed repetitive at times.

What was missing

There was nothing missing from this training module.

What was unnecessary

There was nothing unnecessary about this training module.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

The interactive editing tutorial allowed me to understand how to edit and format articles better.

--Gwill6955 (talk) 21:24, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

I liked how there were videos to give better explanations of how to do something on Wikipedia.

What I didn't like

I did not the length of this training module. I feel like I will not remember a lot of what was being taught.

What was missing

There was nothing missing from this training module.

What was unnecessary

There was nothing unnecessary about this training module.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

The interactive editing tutorial allowed me to understand how to edit and format articles better.

--Gwill6955 (talk) 21:25, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: You made it easy for a beginner to understand and follow easily.

...

What I didn't like: There was a lot. However, because you made it easy to follow and easy to navigate through the training program, that made it easier to digest and remember.

...

What was missing: No idea. I am a newbie.

...

What was unnecessary: The repeating was a little... repetitive, but I understand the need for it.

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Not bad. Made the digestion of all the information a bit easier.

...

--Owenspg (talk) 19:20, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: The step by step instruction was easy to follow. I liked the links to the video content as well.

...

What I didn't like: The training takes quite a bit of time and is quite in depth. There's a lot to learn and to remember. I was hoing for a "quick start" type of guide, but maybe that's not realistic.

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary: The "edit tab" youtube video was fun, but perhaps not necessary.

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I liked the tutorials, though I didn't navigate the first one correctly.

...

--Archie0401 (talk) 22:10, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Chrislid49 (talk) 15:56, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

I really liked the sandbox tutorials

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

some of the short videos

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

super helpful, wish there were more even

--RoseKorn (talk) 16:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

I liked the interactive editing sessions.

What I didn't like

There was a lot to learn, still is, but there is no way to work around it.

What was missing

More interactive tutorials would be nice.

What was unnecessary

It was all good information.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

The interactive editing tutorials were the most helpful part of this orientation. I was very pleased to get the guidance of the tutorial.

--TheRondanimal (talk) 16:16, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Easy to follow, and super informative.

What I didn't like

A lot of information at once. Afraid I'll forget it all.

What was missing

More practice.

What was unnecessary

N/A

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

N/A

--TexanBackpacker (talk) 04:09, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: I really like the videos, they helped me out a lot.

...

What I didn't like: Some information was confusing like the steps of bold.

...

What was missing: More in depth information or even examples.

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Some was pretty confusing and one helped me out.

...

--Celena21 (talk) 20:07, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... Videos

What I didn't like

... Length

What was missing

...Pictures/graphics

What was unnecessary

...making a profile

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...Loved it, wish it could all be like that

--Breezyshore (talk) 20:15, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Everything - training really helpfully acquainted me w/ the basics, and gave me enough links to seek out more advanced info. I wish I had this when I started wanting to edit in the past!

What I didn't like

n/a

What was missing

I don't know yet! Maybe there's some weird wiki magic I am unaware of? I know most of what to do that I think I need to do.

I'm still a bit confused about how to select specific pictures from wiki commons when adding them to an article (where to get the filename for the first section of the template).

What was unnecessary

n/a

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

It was super helpful! I feel a lot more confident about my knowledge now, and have a bunch of sandbox pages to look at if I forget anything.

--LookOnMyEditsYeMighty (talk) 02:34, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... It was very positive and thorough

What I didn't like

... The images to help check if we had formatted our page right were misaligned

What was missing

... nothing

What was unnecessary

... nothing

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... Loved it! --Emmaeadwyer (talk) 04:48, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...I liked that it offered video help in case that was something you're interested in

What I didn't like

...Nothing

What was missing

...N/A

What was unnecessary

...N/A

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...N/A

--Clpgator (talk) 21:16, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

The videos were short but covered all of the necessary material.

What I didn't like

The codes seem as though they will be somewhat difficult for those without coding knowledge to learn.

What was missing

Nothing comes to mind.

What was unnecessary

Explaining how to make words bold seems rather self-explanatory when there's a button on the edit page for it.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

It was fairly helpful, though it disappeared at one point and I couldn't find it again.

--Mattwithoutabat (talk) 21:36, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...I liked how it went into great detail about everything, and that it was easy to follow and understand.

What I didn't like

... It was way too long in my opinion

What was missing

... I didn't think anything was really missing

What was unnecessary

... the beginning of every section.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... I didn't do it

--KENNYTHEMANAGER (talk) 16:54, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What was missing

... How do I use the Talk page on my user toolbar? The tutorial explains talk pages in articles, but it looks like I have my own. Is this just a log of my activity? or is it a comment section?

--RocketSams (talk) 02:41, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: I liked the abundance of material and the style in which

it was presented. ...

What I didn't like: There were a couple of technical glitches.

...

What was missing: Nothing of importance.

...

What was unnecessary: I found it all relevant and encouraging.

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?...

The tutorial was an etremely useful tool.Matthisvalerie (talk) 20:09, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--Matthisvalerie (talk) 20:09, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...Loved the interactive tutorials!

What I didn't like

...I noticed that for some codes it would help to write to remember putting a space between # and item 1 for example

What was missing

...I would have liked an example of what an edit summary should include

What was unnecessary

...N/A

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I loved it. Made things easy and learning fun!

--Linjess (talk) 22:30, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... I found the fact that we could make edits to practice very useful.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... It was really helpful with the right alerts and prompts to guide a first time user. --Sm1986 (talk) 23:13, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: Friendly instructions that were thorough without bogging down the reader.

...

What I didn't like: Module 3 was a little long.

...

What was missing: Nothing.

...

What was unnecessary: Perhaps the division between medical and other edits.

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Did not try.

...

--Shangguthrie (talk) 02:47, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...It was easy!

What I didn't like

...The interactive training made it less daunting.

What was missing

...Nothing.

What was unnecessary

...Nothing.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...It worked and it was very helpful!

--Oshinrai19 (talk) 00:53, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... The whole thing was very easy to follow along with, and presented just enough information to the point where I didn't feel overwhelmed.

What I didn't like

... I had no issues with this training module. There was a nice balance between information presented in both text and video form.

What was missing

... Nothing that I can think of.

What was unnecessary

... Nothing

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... Works just as they showed in the tutorial videos. --Blue.goggles (talk) 19:23, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: It is nice to have interactive options. It makes people interested

...

What I didn't like: I understand that there are many laws people have to abide to but the training is quite long

...

What was missing: I didn't see something missing for my part

...

What was unnecessary: All that has been said was useful.

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Jonathan isengingo (talk) 21:40, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...Thoroughness with instructions, guidelines and sources

What I didn't like

...Complicated process ie. sandbox, Did You Know, grading, citing, editing, watch list, types of articles, etc. Too many different pages and areas that can be overlooked.

What was missing

...Nothing that I can think of.

What was unnecessary

...I'm not sure yet. Just beginning.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...It was informative and helpful.

--Guilfordpsych (talk) 17:48, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Yoonsz25 (talk) 06:34, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

The videos made it easy to understand because it showed what was being talked about.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I liked it

--JjoeE360 (talk) 23:44, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...The videos that went along with the sections were helpful. It was also nice to learn about the different aspects of community that I never knew went behind the pages.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Lcgpbdp (talk) 19:56, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... useful info for beginners

What I didn't like

Too wordy... ...

What was missing

Not really. ...

What was unnecessary

some advice on how to find articles are not useful for beginner ...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Jchow601dvc (talk) 22:15, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... The intro is really clear

What I didn't like

... It's a little bit too long, and lots of redirections- sending me to another page and then go back, etc.

What was missing

... More specific about about different areas and topics. Also a chance to really practice whether we really learnt or not. I feel like I've seen and practiced a lot, but remembered only a few.

What was unnecessary

... Not that I can think of. Everything is really instrumental

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... It is really helpful!!!! But I wish it could be harder, like really asking us to do some editing instead of just copying and pasting. --Gabriella Ji (talk) 05:59, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... Very easy to use. The popups were intelligent and helpful.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Nick4nike23 (talk) 03:35, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Objectives listed at beginning of each module helped me focus my attention.

What I didn't like

Videos were buggy and caused problems. Dialogue boxes kept popping up, even when I moused-back to a previous page.

What was missing

Nothing I know of.

What was unnecessary

NA

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

See above --Flinnre (talk) 06:23, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

The organization, the videos

What I didn't like

There was nothing I did not like

What was missing

Nothing

What was unnecessary

Everything was necessary

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

It was easy to follow

--Melissa Edwards (talk) 04:21, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...I liked that the tutorial gave thorough instructions and made it user friendly. It also came with videos to watch in case I was still confused.

What I didn't like

...I think the coding instructions were a little overwhelming if youve never done anything with coding before.

What was missing

...More tutorials on how to do coding and what it means.

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Lexidg (talk) 23:53, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

Y'all--not bad at all. Well done. I think you struck a pretty nice balance between detail and overview. Tell you what, though, I also want my students to learn "History", diffs, etc... Dr Aaij (talk) 03: 06, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback

What I liked

... The videos

What I didn't like

... The wording of the HTML is confusing

What was missing

... What pictures are appropriate to upload.

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... It was useful --Willowjohnson23 (talk) 19:31, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... it's very simplified

What I didn't like

... nothing

What was missing

... nothing

What was unnecessary

... the training

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... i think it's very useful --Chrissiejr (talk) 09:38, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Suman6395 (talk) 17:52, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

It was comprehensive, easy to follow, and encouraging.

What I didn't like

I would have preferred more hands-on work.

What was missing

Maybe a pro/con list of editing with code v. without.

What was unnecessary

It all seemed relevant.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I tried one of them and it was very useful to have different parts of the page pointed out so clearly.

--Aandrewwangg (talk) 21:10, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...Short and concise descriptions on each page. Hit the main points without being too overwhelming.

What I didn't like

...Videos seemed repetitive of what was written in text.

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Samantha.myhre (talk) 23:51, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... easy to understand

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Rupal Dugar (talk) 16:34, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...The training was very comprehensive, and I liked how it was broken up into logical, "manageable" modules or subsections -- made it an enjoyable learning experience, and ideal for self-paced learning. Also, the alternate links out to YouTube were helpful.

What I didn't like

...Really don't have feedback for aspects I didn't like. Again, very well done, well designed, user-friendly.

What was missing

...I suppose the more experienced that I become editing Wikipedia articles may suggest something, but nothing at this time.

What was unnecessary

...All was good. As much information as a person could want, and the extra embedded links make additional content available for those who wish to click to explore further.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...Have not tried it yet, but I plan to go back and do so.

--Hijodecarl (talk) 02:47, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...The interactive bits in the Sandbox

What I didn't like

...The videos

What was missing

...More interaction

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...Very useful

--SingingInSpring (talk) 19:02, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Kmay1208 (talk) 19:21, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

I liked the quality of the explanations and how it engaged the person to continue

What I didn't like

I would like to learn more about advanced editing and markup in the Advanced Editing section

What was missing

As explained above

What was unnecessary

Nothing; everything was well-explained and crucial in scope

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Wonderful. I loved them, thank you.

--Coderenius (talk) 03:50, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: The training was very clear and concise. Covered a lot of the basics with some activities included.

...

What I didn't like: Some of the training was slightly too basic. Would have liked to see more demonstrations of editing in progress.

...

What was missing: Showing examples of the different quality of articles.

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? The interactive material worked well! Good demonstration and did not experience any problems along the way.

...

--ObscuraScientia (talk) 03:29, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...I liked everything.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Rong Lee (talk) 01:29, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... It was very easy to navigate through and was clear and concise

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Staceyjanke (talk) 02:07, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Djrlandry (talk) 07:55, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... Overall comprehensiveness and simplicity

What I didn't like

... the videos played all choppy-like but that could have been my internet connection

What was missing

... more guided and expanded tutorials

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... It was good but could be expanded upon to really hone skills --Djrlandry (talk) 07:59, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: I liked the videos

...

What I didn't like: was how it didn't let me try the interactive editing

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Am.alau.1118 (talk) 19:19, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: Very comprehensive tutorial

...

What I didn't like: Some videos did not work

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I fond it very helpful

...

--Hyemmm (talk) 23:51, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: neutral

...

What I didn't like: length of training and still couldn't grasp the how to or why Wikipedia is a useful tool for students in this course - I can see this training being useful to students in the Computer or technology studies

...

What was missing: Not a question I can answer since I don't know anything about Wikipedia yet as I am new to this forum...however, having a printable "cheat sheet" at the end would be helpful so that we can refer to the code

What was unnecessary: Why have EDIT source if Edit Beta is so easy...many people do not care to know how to use source/computer code, even make your own web pages (such as word press...) doesn't use source code...its all done in a user friendly way for people who are not computer literate.

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? ...

Instructions were easy to navigate

--Froglady1969 (talk) 14:04, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... I noticed one problem with the tutorial. Every time it said to click the Edit tab, what it actually wanted you to click was the Edit Source tab. There is an Edit tab right beside that, so it was confusing at first because selecting the actual Edit tab did not work. If it helps - I am a chrome user, Version 43.0.2357.132 m --AnneMcCoy (talk) 16:37, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... Easy to follow. Videos are helpful because it's more visual and makes more sense.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... I liked it. I had a little bit of a problem when I was trying to advance at one point and it kept telling me to save even after I had saved it and was trying to see the preview.

--Ferryrac (talk) 04:01, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...the plagiarism and copyright video - excellent resource ...the overall design. This was direct and specific

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...not yet...

--Marentette (talk) 20:22, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... There was a lot of detail and useful cheat sheets for easy reference. Thank you for that!Dragonfly5660 (talk) 02:29, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What I didn't like

... Nothing really.

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... Great learning tool. I'll be able to remember the information and techniques better. Dragonfly5660 (talk) 02:29, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--Dragonfly5660 (talk) 02:29, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback from Ziggy2012

What I liked

Interactive tutorials

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I found it useful. For me, just reading material isn't enough to remember how to do it so having the opportunity to read and then try it out was very helpful.

--Ziggy2012 (talk) 12:33, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... This training is amazing! For the first time to use it, I got lots of information of Wikipedia.

What I didn't like

...Some explanation aren't easy to understand.

What was missing

...Nothing, I think.

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I think the tutorial is wonderful! I will definitely suggest my friend the tutorial if they want to use Wiki. --Masked Shaco (talk) 19:14, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

videos & pace

What I didn't like

going back and forth between tutorial and my sandbox, tricky

What was missing

what was unnecessary

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

liked it, but hard to get back to main program sometimes

--InstructorUCD (talk) 10:51, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...The explanation of the importance of the five pillars

What I didn't like

...The YouTube videos

What was missing

... Nothing, that I can think of.

What was unnecessary

... The YouTube videos

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...Very helpful to get interactive experience

--BVenzke1 (talk) 17:09, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: I liked the visual aspects of the training. I like to see the specific symbols to utilize during editing, etc.

...

What I didn't like: The length of the training. I know it was all crucial for the intended training, however it took a while to get through all of the relevant information.

...

What was missing: no comment

...

What was unnecessary: no comment

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Did not use it.

...

--PaulaY (talk) 17:00, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... The videos were helpful

What I didn't like

... It would have been better if links automatically opened in a new window

What was missing

...nothing

What was unnecessary

...It was all appropriate and necessary.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Trachelleleach (talk) 02:41, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...Supporting documents, converstational tone, sense of being on same team

What I didn't like

...some techy jargon. Maybe a better to put in an easy to find reference area

What was missing

...na

What was unnecessary

...na

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Christianmay0101010 (talk) 03:38, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Easy to follow. Lots of good do's and don'ts. I tried a wiki assignment a couple of years ago and clearly did not understand the background and ground rules.

What I didn't like

All good.

What was missing

I won't really know that until I get started.

What was unnecessary

Maybe Barnstars. I'm just getting started and probably a long way from worrying about others work. But it is an interesting first intro to the community.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

It worked well and was especially helpful.

--Jennifer.Queen (talk) 19:54, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

I liked the step by step instructions on how to edit, the videos and the interactive editing tutorial were extremely helpful. Everything was very clear in regards to both culture and expectations within the Wikipedia community.

What I didn't like

I really thought everything was great.

What was missing

I really couldn't say at this point what was missing, I felt satisfied and informed.

What was unnecessary

I appreciate all the input I can get, I cannot recall thinking something I encountered was unnecessary.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I found this aspect the most helpful.

--Danewelle (talk) 19:32, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

It was a very helpful introduction for me: it was at an appropriate level, summarized the most important information, and provided links for more detailed information. I'd be much more interested, however, in what my students might think about it.

What I didn't like

Nothing comes to mind right now. Again, I'd be interested in knowing whether or not my students would agree with my comments above.

What was missing

There was nothing missing because you provided links to videos and (especially) articles that provided additional information.

What was unnecessary

I don't remember thinking that something was unnecessary as I went through the training modules.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I did not try it. --JRicker,PhD (talk) 19:30, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: Liked the combination of videos and text and the downloadable bits. Liked diversity in the faces

...

What I didn't like: Could have had more examples from real pages.

...

What was missing: Probably lots but then it would be longer.

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Fine.

...

--Agelaia (talk) 16:14, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

the sense of community provided was very welcoming and calmed many inhibitions about this being over my head. ...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I found it helpful. Reading about how to work with technology is far different than trying it out. It provided clarity on what i was reading. ...

--Madysonegan (talk) 10:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Easy and included everything which I need or I don't

What I didn't like

too lengthy

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Guddan08 (talk) 12:02, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...very easy to follow. It explained everything well/

What I didn't like

...Not a hundred percent sure how to add photos but that is okay.

What was missing

...Clear instructions on where to save photos.

What was unnecessary

...The videos promoting wikipedia.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...It was handy and helped a lot.

--Alexisolson (talk) 19:49, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...the training

What I didn't like

...that it says i did not complete the training

What was missing

...me completing the training

What was unnecessary

...me doing this page for the second time

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...i did it was handy

--Alexisolson (talk) 19:58, 17 August 2015 (UTC)alexisolson[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

.The videos were very helpful

What I didn't like

...Liked the whole thing Could be a little more comprehensive

What was missing

...Didn't love the explanation of how to decide what article to work on. As someone who needs to write a wikipedia article from scratch, Im still not reall sure where to start

What was unnecessary?

Thought it was all necesary

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Pretty helpful

--Jbaron96 (talk) 22:31, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: The training videos were very helpful!--Bjhayden (talk) 23:42, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?: it was very helpful. There was a lot of info; I hope I retain it all.--Bjhayden (talk) 23:42, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

...

--Bjhayden (talk) 23:42, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Each page provided concise, straightforward instructions while communicating welcoming and encouraging messages along the way.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

The tutorials were excellent! They covered basic skills in detail without being overwhelming. Coming in, I was not familiar with code, so this was very helpful.

--Senicely (talk) 03:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... It was extremely informative. I have a much better understanding about how to edit and write Wikipedia articles.

What I didn't like

... It was long and the tutorials were a bit confusing.

What was missing

... A comprehensive examination at the end to ensure each trainee had the right understanding of the information.

What was unnecessary

... The videos at the end. They basically reiterated everything that had already been said in the paragraphs.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... It was confusing in some areas. It should have been in a pop-up window so that I wouldn't have to press the back button to get back to the training. --Orobins66 (talk) 16:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

It was helpful to actually make the edits discussed within the tutorial rather than just reading about them.

What I didn't like

What was missing

What was unnecessary

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

The interactive editing tool was the most helpful part of the tutorial.

--Kgocinsk (talk) 17:39, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: The videos.

...

What I didn't like: Not much

...

What was missing: A little more helping in the coding aspect.

...

What was unnecessary: Simple font changes such as bold.

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? The step by step process helped alot.

...

--Adowney31 (talk) 22:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...The youtube videos.

What I didn't like

...Some links did not work in Module 4.

What was missing

...An advancing arrow on Module 4, page 1.

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--LesBrooks (talk) 19:59, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... I liked learning about the wikipedian community

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...Did not try the tutorial.

--AnonARK25 (talk) 23:21, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

The videos showing how things like editing and citations could be done.

What I didn't like

The sandbox tool freezing up and taking me back to the instructions on how to bold face a word every time I entered it.

What was missing

Nothing, I thought it covered a lot.

What was unnecessary

N/A

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

It was a bit clunky at times when it would keep asking me to edit the summary even though I had but, I found much of it helpful!

--Cbiology (talk) 02:09, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback: The training is lengthy... It's difficult for a student to set aside time to go through all the slides at once. It was a lot of reading especially for the editing portions that were best communicated visually anyway.

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Lopezospina (talk) 04:01, 28 August 2015 (UTC) MarzitaMermaid (talk) 08:04, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

figuring out what the good article is

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Jihyek13 (talk) 04:23, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...There was a lot of information on a lot of different important topics and there was a sense of community portrayed.

What I didn't like

...Some of the tutorials were a little bit extensive and slightly confusing, but overall helpful. It is just a matter of applying them myself.

What was missing

...I am not really sure, being new to this and all.

What was unnecessary

...The training was a little bit lengthy, but all of the concepts that were covered are important.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I found that they were helpful for most things, but for some of them they were a little bit confusing with all of the new symbols.

--MarzitaMermaid (talk) 08:03, 28 August 2015 (UTC) MarzitaMermaid (talk) 08:03, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: The details

...

What I didn't like: When you go to try out the sandbox, you lose your place in the training

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Mdanzo0807 (talk) 18:03, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: I liked the edit section, because it was very helpful.

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Wikinils24 (talk) 18:34, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...All of it. It was very informative.

What I didn't like

...Can't think of anything.

What was missing

...I'm not sure. I'm very new to this.

What was unnecessary

...I felt it was all neccessary.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I thought it worked out well. It showed me exactly how to do things.

--Pubh101 (talk) 21:33, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...Learning new things that I had no idea Wikipedia was able to do.

What I didn't like

...It's a little confusing, but I'll have a better understanding the more I use sandbox and Wikipedia overall.

What was missing

...Not sure, the presentation was on point.

What was unnecessary

...Overall great presentation, a lot of good information.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Esco12 (talk) 01:50, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... The tutorials

What I didn't like

... Wish there were different tutorials

What was missing

... More interaction

What was unnecessary

... N/A

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... It was good. Wish there was more to it

--Taylorkwest (talk) 04:02, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I liked using the interactive editing tutorial because it allowed me to visualize the descriptions of techniques from each module. These tutorial videos should be kept!

--Cmbakwe (talk) 04:14, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Videos inserted at strategic points

What I didn't like

Article was too long

What was missing

... An intro that how we can complete the training in parts

What was unnecessary

... N/A

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... Great tool --Abhina (talk) 14:30, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

This was a refreshing view into the modern wikipedia.

What I didn't like

I didn't like the videos, the text and tutorial was much more worthy of my time.

What was missing

What constitutes a good Wikipedian in reference to his/her work.

What was unnecessary

I didn't think the videos were helpful, the text was sufficient.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

It was informative.

--Yihengsong (talk) 16:26, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

… It was fairly thorough.

What I didn't like

… There is no way I'll be able to remember everything, but that's what the help page is for.

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

… I thought the interactive editing tutorial was very helpful. --Jmarrs94 (talk) 18:56, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... detailed and helped me truly understand Wikipedia.

What I didn't like

... It was difficult to practice in the sandbox. A little confused.

What was missing

... more practice.

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... confusing

--Ericito1995 (talk) 21:47, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

simple details for beginners

What I didn't like

seems too long

What was missing

more interaction

What was unnecessary

some of the videos

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

helpe to get familiar

--Sluology (talk) 02:46, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: Nice combination of text and video. Although there was a lot of content, there was not a lot of minutia.

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

worked ok but not being able to go right back to where I was in the tutorial was a bit annoying. ...

As the instructor I thought it was important to go through the student training myself. Great job all around. Barn-stars for everyone involved. --KatieBU (talk) 17:24, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

There should be a like user's manual on the basic knowledge on editing.

What I didn't like

What was missing

Few video tutorials

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Xhy279 (talk) 18:38, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... It was very informative about the basic details of training on wikipedia. It gives people a good head start to editing articles on wikipedia.

What I didn't like

... There was nothing that I didn't like.

What was missing

... There was nothing missing.

What was unnecessary

... There was nothing unneccesary

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... It did a great job of actually showing how to do things. It is easier to learn when you have a real life example of something.

--Abigailgreen (talk) 20:43, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Abigail Green[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... It was very informative about the basic details of training on wikipedia. It gives people a good head start to editing articles on wikipedia.

What I didn't like

... There was nothing that I didn't like.

What was missing

... There was nothing missing.

What was unnecessary

... There was nothing unneccesary

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... It did a great job of actually showing how to do things. It is easier to learn when you have a real life example of something.

--Abigailgreen (talk) 20:44, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Abigail Green[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Plenty of information

What I didn't like

A lot of reading and videos

What was missing

How to create a user page?

What was unnecessary

Nothing really

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

It was actually kind of hard and difficult to remember what to do next --Kikischiciano (talk) 21:28, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

The article was informative and concise

What I didn't like

NA

What was missing

NA

What was unnecessary

NA

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

NA

PratikPratik5791 (talk) 22:59, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: The videos and tutorials helped concrete what was being said.

...

What I didn't like: No explanation on how to create a new article for your sandbox. When discussing the importance of using your sandbox to edit an article, there was no instructions on how to create a article within your sandbox.

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Using Edit source is confusing, perhaps adding more tutorials on using regular edit function rather than source.

...

--S.Steinbrueck (talk) 23:39, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... It was easy to go through and navigate.

What I didn't like

... Slides filled with too much information.

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

... The videos that didn't show a demonstration but instead just discussed what I had already read.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... I liked it due to it getting me involved and seeing the proper results. --MikeJS22 (talk) 23:43, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...I liked how accessible the tutorials were!

What I didn't like

...I am still a little confused on some of the topics. There is a lot to learn about Wikipedia.

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I liked the editing tutorial the most. I thought it was very useful.

--Armars (talk) 01:23, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... How helpful this was

What I didn't like

... Some slides were unnecessary

What was missing

... Not sure

What was unnecessary

... Some slides repeated the same information

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... Very helpful --Kjb033 (talk) 02:45, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...The videos were a big help.

What I didn't like

...It was not very exciting.

What was missing

...I'm not quite sure about what it would be missing yet.

What was unnecessary

...Again, I'm not quite sure what was unnecessary yet.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...It worked decently.

--ClimateCoins (talk) 02:51, 31 August 2015 (UTC)ClimateCoins[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...The fact that the content was straightforward and easy to comprehend. The articles explained the process in-depth, providing a litany of helpful content and access to elements of the expansive Wikipedia community.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

... The edit warring article contained repetitive information (e.g., the description of the 3RRR policy). Some concepts were described nearly verbatim from paragraph to paragraph, with no new contributing content to justify the repetition.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Musicbox107 (talk) 13:14, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Thiel.logan (talk) 14:22, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

I enjoyed how easy it was to learn how to edit, particularly with the new beta features.

What I didn't like

The course seemed a bit long.

What was missing

I would have liked less focus on the "ethic" of editing on Wikipedia and more practice on actually editing as well as the "code" that is used to edit.

What was unnecessary

Wikipedia's training seems to focus a lot on rules for an internet community based on a lack of formal rules.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I really enjoyed the ability to actually practice the skill of editing.

--Vnguyen518 (talk) 16:32, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

The interactive editing training. Very helpful. ...

What I didn't like

Some photos were awkwardly placed in the pages without much context. ...

What was missing

Slight background information about the beginning of Wikipedia could have been helpful/interesting at the start. ...

What was unnecessary

The superfluous "pep talk" text and videos. ...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I thought it was smooth and accurate. In very few cases did the directions lack clarity.

...

--DNMaurer (talk) 19:36, 31 August 2015 (UTC)DNMaurer[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... It was very in depth and explained how Wikipedia worked. The visual images and videos were very helpful for me.

What I didn't like

... Sometime I got lost in how certain things worked. The coding in particular was difficult for me to grasp.

What was missing

... I just started using Wikipedia in this sense, so I really don't know what could be added at this time.

What was unnecessary

... Nothing as far as I know.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... I was confused at times where I was supposed to make the edits. After a few try's I stopped the interactive editing tutorial and just went back to the training tutorial. --AMC-er93 (talk) 00:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: informative and easy to understand

...

What I didn't like: time it took

...

What was missing: n/a

...

What was unnecessary: amount of videos

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? n/a

...

--Ashleyx95 (talk) 01:20, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

very informative!

What I didn't like

a lot of information so I could not process it all at once

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Annkat22 (talk) 01:37, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: the videos were very comprehensive

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? it didn't work super well for me

...

--Lnicholson14 (talk) 02:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Iamonawave (talk) 04:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: I liked that things were divided up into much smaller sections, instead of having to scroll through long pages of text

...

What I didn't like: I felt like it dragged on at points

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Rukataro (talk) 04:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...I particularly like having links to articles associated with how to edit and other various topics such as how to perfect articles and being able to bookmark these links. Unlike a regular encyclopedia or help page the information can be updated and made easier to understand through others.

What I didn't like

...I did not enjoy the videos because I felt as if the text was more explanatory.

What was missing

...I feel that a better introduction to the sandbox would leave me feeling more confident about becoming a wikopedian.

What was unnecessary

...The videos didn't seem to offer much guidance aside from the one about picture uploads.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I much prefer the interactive editing tool because of the simplicity it provides.

--Bhardy7 (talk) 07:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...Thorough information.

What I didn't like

...Took forever!

What was missing

...The tutorials were confusing and did not help much. Horrible instruction.

What was unnecessary

...The instruction window in front of the buttons they are telling you to press in the tutorial. The window should be somewhere else.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...Horrible:-(

--NaturalWonders208 (talk) 08:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...very informative

What I didn't like

...We didn't need to provide feedback to show we are understanding

What was missing

... Questions for us to quiz ourself

What was unnecessary

... None

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Vschlum (talk) 16:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)vschlum (Victoria Schlumbrecht)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

The orientation just didn't teach the technical details of writing a wiki but also the do's and don'ts of being an editor on Wikipedia

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

I think you can include a hands on tutorial of creating and publishing a new sample article on Wikipedia.

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

The interactive editing tutorial was very helpful and gave step-by-step guidance on editing on wikipedia.

--Jitendra92 (talk) 20:46, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

I liked that there is a a tutorial so you can do it yourself

What I didn't like

It was fairly long

What was missing

nothing

What was unnecessary

nothing

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

This was my favorite part

--Amber.l.cusey (talk) 21:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

I liked the way entire training module is designed. At the end of this training, I have a basic idea of how wikipedia works, its rules and policies, how to edit articles, how to communicate with other editors and get help.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Its perfect for the beginners. They can practice all the basic features from these tutorials.

--Panktidesai (talk) 23:07, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Jai Rogers (talk) 23:25, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The tutorial was very informative, clear and easy to follow. I may go through it again just to have the practice. Can't wait to become active in the Wikipedia community. Sending a big thank you to JIMBO for staying true to his entrepreneurial spirit and for not giving in to advertising banners!

Training feedback

What I liked

... Learning how to code on Wikipedia.

What I didn't like

... The confusing path to complete the training.

What was missing

... A better flow throughout the training to limit confusion.

What was unnecessary

... The amount of clicks to get through the training.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... All in all it wasn't too bad. Very informative. --Kzwiener (talk) 00:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... The information on Wikipedia's core values.

What I didn't like

... Some of the charts and graphs were confusing. Specifically, the chart depicted the science articles that were started, stubbed, etc.

What was missing

... More information on the actual writing style of Wikipedia.

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... That was one of the best parts. Very helpful.

--Thepunalsorises (talk) 00:59, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...Very clear, to the point. I enjoyed the videos.

What I didn't like

...I liked everything.

What was missing

...Perhaps more assurance that if we make mistakes it can be corrected easily.

What was unnecessary

...Nothing.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I enjoyed it, I learn very well visually so I felt the videos and the interactive editing tutorial the most helpful.

--LucyAsp (talk) 01:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...Interactive opportunities to try editing

What I didn't like

...Overall wordiness; could have been more concise

What was missing

...how to get to my own user page

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Efoxman42 (talk) 01:49, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...The training was really easy to follow - pretty comprehensive

What I didn't like

...I wish it was more interactive and showed us how the code was written by someone else.

What was missing

...A through qualitative analysis of what is editable and what kinds of information you shouldn't

What was unnecessary

...pretty essential.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I thought the interactive was much better than just the normal one.

--Romildcp (talk) 02:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...I really enjoyed the video and words to explain it!

What I didn't like

...I found nothing I didn't like.

What was missing

...I found nothing missing as I am new to Wiki and it all looked comprehensive to me!

What was unnecessary

...I found nothing unnecessary.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I liked it, it was helpful for those who have never used wiki before.

--Trevor1902 (talk) 06:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...I liked the interactive training. Reading how to do something is helpful, but being guided while performing tasks is definitely preferred.

What I didn't like

...Some of the tutorials were mildly buggy, but were still helpful.

What was missing

...More information on editing profiles and pages.

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I think it was the most beneficial part of the training.

--Thiel.logan (talk) 14:21, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... I liked the interactive editing tutorials.

What I didn't like

...I did not like that the training was over an hour.

What was missing

... The training needs some more interactive tutorials.

What was unnecessary

...Some of the information was the same.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... I thought the process was helpful.

--SRuss12 (talk) 14:34, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... how there was a video and such detailed explanation of everything.

What I didn't like

... everything was pretty straight forward, no complaints

What was missing

... more visuals, minus the videos. Some stuff didn't have videos, it was okay but i prefer the videos.

What was unnecessary

... the explanations plus the videos, maybe just have one or the other.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... i liked it. Shows step by step

--Jessihymel (talk) 21:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Gave a good general overview of the expectations of Wikipedia as well as how the website functions.

What I didn't like

Had to reload the training page after one of the interactive editing tutorials.

What was missing

An explicit example on how to move an article from your sandbox to a main page

What was unnecessary

Most of the information presented was relevant.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

It was very useful in showing how editing an actual article or sandbox would be like.

--ADLins (talk) 22:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Gave a good general overview of the expectations of Wikipedia as well as how the website functions.

What I didn't like

Had to reload the training page after one of the interactive editing tutorials.

What was missing

An explicit example on how to move an article from your sandbox to a main page

What was unnecessary

Most of the information presented was relevant.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

It was very useful in showing how editing an actual article or sandbox would be like.

--ADLins (talk) 22:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...the elaborate step by step details on how to edit.

What I didn't like

...I didn't the repeated focus on wikipedia's goals, I felt it would be more important to focus on more editing procedures.

What was missing

...I didn't think anything was missing from the training.

What was unnecessary

...I felt it was unnecessary that the videos almost exactly repeated word for word what was just read.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I thought it was very helpful.

--Sarahutchinson (talk) 22:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Very descriptive and easy to understand.

What I didn't like

very long.

What was missing

nothing.

What was unnecessary

nothing.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

very helpful to be able to learn interactively!

--Mackenzi Otto 22:50, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback

What I liked: To the point.

...

What I didn't like: Nothing.

...

What was missing: Nothing.

...

What was unnecessary: Nothing.

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Great.

...

--Ssweene2 (talk) 02:06, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...I liked how the orientation included informative videos on how to do specific things that would be harder to figure out by just reading everything all at once.

What I didn't like

...It was a lot of information all at once. I most likely will have to back and rematch the videos and read when I am editing or creating a Wikipedia page.

What was missing

...It was very thorough.

What was unnecessary

...Repetitiveness on being polite to others. Keeping it professional is very important in a college setting when editing papers, etc.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Duchamp123456 (talk) 04:21, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... There was ample amounts of information covering many different topics.

What I didn't like

... I think it was a little too confusing for people who are not good with technology. There was a lot of info and it is hard to pick up on everything when you don't understand technology easily.

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Allielael (talk) 17:46, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

the training was useful and very helpful with telling me what is expected of me.

What I didn't like

...I dislike how long the training was but I understand why it was necessary

What was missing

...I felt like you had all the information needed, I feel like nothing needs to be added.

What was unnecessary

...the videos I felt were a little unnecessary but they were helpful

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... it was a little confusing at first but simple after I tried it for a little bit --Demonleafninja (talk) 18:07, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... It answered questions and talked me through everything that I will use on this site.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... I was able to follow it and it was very helpful. --Amusiclover1325 (talk) 18:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

I did like how helpful and useful it was.

What I didn't like

I didn't like how long the training was.

What was missing

I thought that maybe showing how you edit a article would benefit the students as well.

What was unnecessary

Some

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I thought it was very helpful. It showed me step by step on how to do the edits.

--Vlebla4 (talk) 20:19, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

I liked that the training was not overly complicated. The steps were very clear, and the directions were very succinct.

What I didn't like

There were too many pages.

What was missing

I would have liked more basic, interactive instructions on communicating with other users.

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I would have liked the interactive editing tutorial to be more clear in its directions. I found myself clicking back and forth.

--MYao (talk) 20:49, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: The content was concise and easy to understand.

...

What I didn't like: There were not really any "interactive" parts to the tutorial making it more difficult to practice some of the editing/coding techniques.

...

What was missing: Interactive piece to the tutorial. Perhaps an interactive walkthrough of how to cite a source, for example.

...

What was unnecessary: N/A

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I mentioned there were no "interactive" pieces because it doesn't really walk you through steps. Someone who has less experience with computers may find this challenging.

...

--Trobi33 (talk) 22:58, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... It was easy and concise.

What I didn't like

... The link that said "click on edit" didn't work correctly. You had to click on "edit source" instead.

What was missing

... Nothing I noticed

What was unnecessary

... A lot of paragraphs that prefaced the lesson, that didn't actually teach you anything.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... Don't remember which part that was --GraphiteDirigible (talk) 05:06, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: very easy to understand

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Mianina0 (talk) 15:52, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...I loved the interactive tutorials and how concise, but informative the different modules were.

What I didn't like

...N/A

What was missing

...More tutorials would be helpful for new users, but the tutorials that were present helped a lot!

What was unnecessary

...N/A

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I loved it. It seriously took me step-by-step for using wikicode in articles that I will edit or write.

--HBov (talk) 18:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: The videos were extremely helpful.

...

What I didn't like: The tutorials were not very clear in direction.

...

What was missing: More videos, since the hands- on tutorials were not effective.

...

What was unnecessary: N/A

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? They were not helpful enough they need to be more clear in instruction and guidance.

...

--Abtrahan (talk) 19:26, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

I thought it was an excellent introduction to many of the key things that students need to know for editing Wikipedia.

What I didn't like

While I didn't mind the videos in and of themselves (its a much more interesting way to present data) there were cases were information was only available by video. I would have found it helpful if the text transcript for the video was also available, so that those of us who prefer learning through text could save a bit of time.

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

The basic formatting is less necessary now than it once was and may eventually be entirely unnecessary, as much of it can be handled very intuitively by the beta Visual Editor. While it is my understanding that the Visual Editor still contains some bugs, and so it is important to know how to use regular source editing, this will be less true over time.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Dyz30 (talk) 19:48, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... Training was informative

What I didn't like

... Too complicated, too wordy.

What was missing

... Clear instructional videos

What was unnecessary

... na

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... I got lost. I ended up editing something without knowing it and someone messaged me asking if I needed help. I didn't know how to respond. Then I was left hanging and had to start over to go back to where I was in the training. It is not streamlined/linked well

--DereenyKentoni (talk) 22:33, 4 September 2015 (UTC)DereenyKentoni[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...The videos and the links to outside training.

What I didn't like

...The length.

What was missing

...Nothing I noted.

What was unnecessary

...All of the information felt necessary to create good wikipedia content.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I liked it very much and felt that it helped me better understand the terms that were being used.

--RSaucedo00 (talk) 00:10, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... I liked the interactive parts of the training, the videos, and how straight forward all the information was presented to me.

What I didn't like

... There were some pages that didn't explain enough.

What was missing

... More interactive sessions that walk you through the steps.

What was unnecessary

... Nothing was really unnecessary, everything helped.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... I loved it, definitely made me understand it better because I was actually doing it! --Madimorris (talk) 08:01, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: I thought the tutorials were well laid out, and presented the rules and foundations of Wikipedia very well. As something non-editors are unfamiliar with, I think that's the most useful part of the training.

...

What I didn't like: I think there could be a bit more emphasis on the actual Wikicode, as I know I'll have to go back and recheck how to perform certain functions.

...

What was missing: As above.

...

What was unnecessary: Very little; I think the training could be longer, but it certainly does not need to shorter.

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Artfuldodger08 (talk) 15:41, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Rosandguil (talk) 16:54, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

Links to PDF's and such that can be saved

What I didn't like

...

Videos didn't work or upload well

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Collaboration0826 (talk) 18:47, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

I couldn't turn off the fireworks sound when it started, so when I started the tutorial on the same page I couldn't hear it. It was cute, but a little frustrating.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--April ahmed (talk) 19:16, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I think the videos may need updating to include the changes in features. It was a little confusing at first trying to figure out whether I was supposed to be using 'Edit' or 'Edit source' while practice editing.

--Stooty (talk) 20:56, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...the tutorials

What I didn't like

... When you clicked on links you had to start the tutorial over.

What was missing

... Nothing that I can think of.

What was unnecessary

... Nothing that I can think of.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... I thought it was helpful.

--Laura.silverstein1 (talk) 02:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Interactive editing

What I didn't like

A bit repetitive

What was missing

Nothing

What was unnecessary

Too many links in some sections

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Great way to introduce a new user to the system

--Srcheng (talk) 05:24, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... I liked the videos. They clarified many of the editing techniques. I also liked how it helped you go through the sandbox. It gave a good starting point for when I start creating an article in it. Ill have a little knowledge about it.

What I didn't like

...Some of the slides were repetitive.

What was missing

... Showing a way to access the links for topic suggestions later without having to go all the way through training again.

What was unnecessary

... how much time was spend driving the point home that Wiki is a community. There were many slides devote to this throughout the WHOLE presentation.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...Very helpful!!!

--ApolloSunrise987654321 (talk) 15:34, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... There were videos and opportunities to find out more about how to do different processes.

What I didn't like

... Nothing!

What was missing

... I think it would be great to keep working on Beta (the visual editor).

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... I loved it. I don't have to go back and forth between the training and my own sandbox. --RockyLeng8 (talk) 16:50, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... Very informative!

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... Very helpful

--A.Farrar0696 (talk) 20:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)A.Farrar0696[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Clearity information

What I didn't like

too much information to process

What was missing

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Reminds me of the word processor --Gilmore814 (talk) 23:00, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Pages were short - no information overload. Menu was helpful for navigation. Interactive editing tutorial was definitely very helpful.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

Broken page? Doesn't redirect back to the tutorial

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Very helpful.

--Vellichor (talk) 23:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...I liked how easy it was to understand the material with corresponding videos for almost every section. It made it easy to understand and navigate through my pages.

What I didn't like

...I didn't like how much information there was at one time. I feel like there is a lot of information I will not remember so I hope the help pages will be easy to view and comprehend.

What was missing

...Nothing, there was plenty of information explaining the process that was easy to understand.

What was unnecessary

...Everything was necessary in order to understand the process.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I thought it was helpful since it gave step by step instructions on each part we needed to learn about.

--Meliacarlin (talk) 23:43, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... i loved the interactive tutorial that allowed for on the spot training and feedback.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

... nothing!

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... it was awesome, so helpful. --155190Martin (talk) 01:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...There was a lot of useful information that was written out in the simplest form. The videos were also very useful.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...More videos.

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...The interactive editing tutorial was great. It's perfect for getting started because it allows us to actually start writing in our sandbox.

--Jbarrerawgss (talk) 03:26, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...Simple and step by step instructions.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Mpatel61 (talk) 15:36, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

I appreciated the interactive training and videos. It made this processes easier and allowed me to actually learn how to apply the information from the tutorials. Having opportunities to practice posed as a real benefit.

What I didn't like

Some information I found redundant, but I realize that this introductory training must be thorough to ensure everyone (of different comfort levels and experience) has equal opportunity to learn.

What was missing

I wish there was more information about the sandbox and reference lists. For example, if someone has already drafted and article in their sandbox, but then wants to have more content in there, will this conflict in the transfer of references in future articles?

What was unnecessary

N/a

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I really liked it! Keep up the good work, Wikipedia!

--Ejd2012 (talk) 15:50, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...The cite was easy to navigate.

What I didn't like

...Nothing

What was missing

...Nothing

What was unnecessary

...The barnstar seemed unnecessary to learn.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I had a difficult time understanding the citation process. I had to watch it three times and still do not feel comfortable. Also it would help to have a short explanation of what constitutes legal pictures to use from the web on our pages. How do I tell what is available and what is not?

--Cmconnorusf (talk) 15:54, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...videos are helpful, the steps are clear to follow.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

..

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...It is pretty straight forward.

--MoMoDa (talk) 18:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...videos are helpful, the steps are clear to follow.

What I didn't like

... It was too long.

What was missing

..I want to save PDF version of it and read all at once after if I want to check something.

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...It is pretty straight forward.

--MoMoDa (talk) 18:41, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... I liked how clear the rules were when they were presented.

What I didn't like

... I did not like the length of the orientation. It was long.

What was missing

... Nothing was missing.

What was unnecessary

... Maybe the some of the more detailed parts were unnecessary.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... I was okay.

--Louiseishere (talk) 18:46, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...I truly enjoyed the additional videos added to some of the pages further explaining the topic.

What I didn't like

...Some of the information seemed to be out of order or informed me I would learn it later. I would rather have learned it at that moment or not be told about it at all.

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I loved being able to try out and experience what I was being taught at that moment.

--Bri5rose (talk) 20:13, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Simple and straight forward

What I didn't like

No mention of how to get back to all of these sites!

What was missing

How to return to all of the sites, issues with interactive editing tutorial

What was unnecessary

Nothing all relevant

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

parts were good, definitely need to change the Edit popup to say press the edit source button, that was super confusing --Rhumke (talk) 22:22, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...I liked the videos

What I didn't like

...It's not as easy as it seems.

What was missing

...nothing.

What was unnecessary

...nothing.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...It helps a lot.

--Melisr (talk) 22:31, 7 September 2015 (UTC)melisr[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

I enjoyed the videos showing me things, rather than just lists telling me.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--ABluvsU (talk) 22:46, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Premaldesai05 (talk) 02:42, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... Short pages

What I didn't like

... Confusing

What was missing

... better navigation

What was unnecessary

... nothing

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Skannel24 (talk) 05:04, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... Slides and videos were easy to understand.

What I didn't like

... I became somewhat bogged down with the amount of information in all of the slides.

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Mritte10 (talk) 05:18, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...everything about the tutorial

What I didn't like

... the examples would have been more in number

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

... As a new person i think i dint feel anything unnecessary

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... it was not so good.. can be improved

--Ramadheeraj (talk) 15:00, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...The videos

What I didn't like

...Nothing, a little wordy in spots

What was missing

...Nothing that I'm aware of

What was unnecessary

... Nothing, I felt everything was helpful.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...There were some bugs that made me repeat the same steps over and over

--Rgrego4 (talk) 17:23, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...I liked that there were both tutorial videos and interactive test sessions

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...A table of contents down the side would have been nice with an indicator of where you were. This would have helped when I thought of questions and didn't know if they would later be addressed. Would have helped me decide if it was worth remembering

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I liked it but it would be nice if the links that started them would open a new window or tab. This would have made it easy when I made mistakes and tried to go back to a page that would let me start the tutorial over.

--RayneEmily (talk) 21:05, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

The training was very straightforward and easy to well. And got me excited to be part of such a global community!

What I didn't like

It's a lot of information at once, but that's not really a problem.

What was missing

Nothing that I could tell!

What was unnecessary

Nothing!

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Pretty cool--a lil confusing at first, but definitely helpful

)

--Kev.w.pri (talk) 21:17, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... The information was presented in manageable segments.

What I didn't like

... The formatting seems like it is going to be a little tricky.

What was missing

... Nothing major was missing.

What was unnecessary

... Some of the videos seemed a little redundant, simply repeating the information in the text.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... The directions did not always seem to match up with what you were presented with in the sandbox.

--Mv663012 (talk) 23:05, 8 September 2015 (UTC)Mv663012[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... The training on how to add pictures as well as the training on editing

What I didn't like

... How the training goes into very little detail about how to effectively write a good article

What was missing

... Maybe have more on the topic of finding substantial sources for your article.

What was unnecessary

... nothing

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Rsowick (talk) 23:20, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: It was clean and quick.

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing: There was a weird page in the middle that looked out of place

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Peterhmasters (talk) 23:31, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...The interactive tutorials with sandbox

What I didn't like

...The repetitive information

What was missing

...More interactive tutorials allowing a more hands-on experience with wiki markup

What was unnecessary

...N/A

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...it was very useful and helped me understand the basics as well as get more familiarized with wiki coding

--Mjeyaraj (talk) 23:34, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...The video demonstrations.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Rkelly66 (talk) 23:56, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... the detailed way the tutorial is presented and the video tutorials

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... the indications on what to do next

--Cryola skies (talk) 01:57, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...Overall the training was pretty good.

What I didn't like

...The edit sandbox page kept messing up on me and I had to redo the section

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I tried it, it was okay, but the edit sandbox page kept messing up on me and I had to redo the section.

--Bobcatdodger25 (talk) 03:01, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...The practice pages were a great way to actually experiment with Wikipedia and understanding how everything works. Learning by doing is the most effective.

What I didn't like

...There was not too many opportunities to learn and at times I got confused once real pages were revealed to get back to the orientation pages.

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...Really liked it, can probably try to make it more detailed to make it a bit more challenging.

--MackenzieD16 (talk) 03:03, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--VanceScarlett (talk) 03:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback; the instructions and follow up were really helpful. it helped give a clear knowledge on how to go about the wikipedia project!

What I liked

... I liked that every information was detailed.

What I didn't like

... i did not like the fact that some so many things were a bit confusing to me because this is my first time building a page

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... i think it was pretty helpful

--Uwa barbra (talk) 03:20, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... The videos were helpful.

What I didn't like

... There wasn't really much not to like. There was just a lot of information, which was a little overbearing at some points.

What was missing

... I didn't see much to my knowledge that was/is missing.

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... The interactive tutorial was not something that I tried.

--HeneryDave31 (talk) 03:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback; the instructions and follow up were really helpful. it helped give a clear knowledge on how to go about the wikipedia project!

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Uwa barbra (talk) 03:24, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... It was very descriptive and easy to follow - The videos helped tremendously!

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... Great! The sandbox provides a nice isolated area to fiddle around with the tools.

--Jd236 (talk) 04:29, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--SiyuanYin 13:52, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback

What I liked

... The videos were very helpful.

What I didn't like

...The explanation of talk pages was kind of confusing.

What was missing

...Nothing crucial.

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Claryce (talk) 14:16, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...The interactive training segments were helpful and helped to gain hands on experience.

What I didn't like

...A bit confusing at times.

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I liked it a lot! Very helpful!

--Nicolericci95 (talk) 21:26, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Saharisabz (talk) 23:32, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: Straight forward, and concise

...

What I didn't like: Not the most interactive, the sandbox tutorials could be better

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--MindMerchant (talk) 23:54, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: It was very detailed in explaining every portion on how posting to Wikipedia is done. I loved the video of people from all over the world talking about posting to Wikipedia, it really advertises the fact that Wikipedia is so much more than a simple site that feeds people information.

...

What I didn't like: It was a little long at times, I found I lost interest after a certain period of time, especially in the 3rd module.

...

What was missing: nothing that I can think of

...

What was unnecessary: explaining everything and then show a how to video with a more in depth explanation.

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... I love it, it really showed me the ropes!

--RCEP (talk) 00:19, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

the interactive video tutorials ...

What I didn't like

too much info all at once for beginners ...

What was missing: ...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

very helpful...

--Cinemazing (talk) 03:18, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... The videos were helpful because they showed exactly what to do.

What I didn't like

... Everything was fine.

What was missing

... It could have included navigating our class pages.

What was unnecessary

... I think that everything included was necessary.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--AlexisCarter267 (talk) 06:32, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: The training was very clear and to the point.

...

What I didn't like: To much reading ( make this online training less words)

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Raqwedajones (talk) 12:55, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... Very Comprehensive.

What I didn't like

... The interactive editing tutorial.

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... The editing tutorials should be opened in a new tab rather than on the same page. --Graduate CS Student at NCSU 17:33, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback

What I liked

...The interactive part makes things easy to understand.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Zkwan3 (talk) 20:41, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Videos were easy to follow ...

What I didn't like

Too much wikicoding to remember, a single document to print out would be easier ...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

It let me edit one test page, and then didn't give me the option to continue the tutorial, so I had to go back to the training. ...

--Tmeister21 (talk) 23:09, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... The breakdown of material into manageable sections.

What I didn't like

... The amount of repetition.

What was missing

... More feedback on practice simulations

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... I think it would be good to have the program check whether the person is taking the correct steps. Ivorobi33--Ivorobi33 (talk) 00:36, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

... The online tutorial pages were pretty easy to follow

What I didn't like: ... I'm not a huge fan of coding, so the fact that some of the commands use coding wasn't something that I particularly liked.

What was missing

... An online quiz to show that we actually understood the stuff

What was unnecessary

... Having to learn code to do some edits

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

... I wasn't a huge fan of the editing tutorial because in order to try doing edits, you would need to go to another page on the same tab rather than having a new tab open so you could try editing and it made having to scroll back to the tutorial a hassle. Jas148 (talk) 00:53, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: Everything.

What I didn't like: The second part.

What was missing: The last part.

What was unnecessary: It kept repeating.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was a good video.

Training feedback

What I liked: clear and to the point

...

What I didn't like: a bit repetitive

...

What was missing: n/a

...

What was unnecessary: the various tidbits of coding that are easily forgotten

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? easy to use

...

--Swu160 (talk) 05:26, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

The information about how to choose a good article. The difference between copyright and plagiarism. Appreciation of good work through WikiLove.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

Information about getting your article on Main Page's featured articles list

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Ronak Ghadiya (talk) 08:28, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked: It was easy to get through.

...

What I didn't like: No interface to go back if you messed up during the interactive portions.

...

What was missing: Something to help guide you better if you messed up.

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Needed work on navigating on what to exactly do and to be able to do something if you messed up and had to back up.

...

--Blitzs20 (talk) 08:42, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

I liked the easy format of the training.

What I didn't like

I wish it would have been more explanatory and straightforward.

What was missing

A basic approach to editing Wikipedia.

What was unnecessary

Most of the videos could have been replaced by text examples.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

It was good, but I wish it would have been more helpful by providing more on-screen instruction.

--Rjc12 (talk) 13:36, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...When it shows me how to remove citation needed and add reliable source

What I didn't like

...Nothing

What was missing

...Nothing

What was unnecessary

...Absolutely nothing

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...It was like my dreams are coming to happen.

--Ras Benjih (talk) 17:42, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Great and very helpful, but some UI differences between the tutorial and the actual website were confusing

--Nwerry (talk) 17:02, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...The specific training for psychology and medical related topics.

What I didn't like

...nothing, I think it was a fairly good tutorial and helpful to get started editing.

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I liked it for the most part, I think that it could have been more comprehensive.

--Amandafoort (talk) 17:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

I liked the fact the training was well explained and guided me through the procedures

What I didn't like

As a first approach to this whole editing process, perhaps it could have been a little less long and complex

What was missing

I didn't find anything missing, but again, I am new to this

What was unnecessary

The advanced editing, perhaps, as I will need more time and practice to remember everything I've just read

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

It was actually pretty cool and functional

--Asile91 (talk) 17:27, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...To evaluate Wikipedia can help to learn what makes a good or bad Wikipedia article.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...Editing is fun always.

--Ras Benjih (talk) 21:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

Very well organized, and easy to follow the progression of ideas ...

What I didn't like: Timing for subtitles was 1 second too early in the videos

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Serban Sirca (talk) 23:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...How interactive the training was

What I didn't like

...Sometimes it took me to my sandbox and I couldn't navigate back to where I was in the training and had to start all over

What was missing

...Nothing that I can think of

What was unnecessary

...Nothing that I can thnk of

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I really liked it! I thought that it was very helpful

--CAlvarez33 (talk) 23:38, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

...The How-To videos.

What I didn't like

...Some of the modules were too long.

What was missing

...More editing exercises.

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...I thought it was pretty useful to see the edits in real-time and get used to seeing how the code works.

--Nah.vee (talk) 06:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Training feedback

What I liked

The videos ...

What I didn't like

How long the editing section was ...

What was missing

Nothing ...

What was unnecessary

Nothing ...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Keyona m (talk) 06:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6,351: / Line 6,351: @@
 --[[User:Nah.vee|Nah.vee]] ([[User talk:Nah.vee|talk]]) 06:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
+== Training feedback ==
+;What I liked:
+The videos
+...
+;What I didn't like:
+How long the editing section was
+...
+;What was missing:
+Nothing
+...
+;What was unnecessary:
+Nothing
+...
+;If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
+...
+--[[User:Keyona m|Keyona m]] ([[User talk:Keyona m|talk]]) 06:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)