Jump to content

John Peter Zenger: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Undid revision 681340921 by 168.184.14.100 (talk)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox person
{{Infobox person
| name = john quincy adams
| name = John Peter Zenger
| image =
| image =
| alt =
| alt =

Revision as of 20:49, 16 September 2015

John Peter Zenger
BornOctober 26, 1697
Impflingen, Germany
DiedJuly 28, 1746
New York City
OccupationNewspaper writer
Years active1720-1746
Known forZenger case
Notable workNew York Weekly Journal
The trial, as imagined by an illustrator in the 1883 book Wall Street in History

John Peter Zenger (October 26, 1697 – July 28, 1746) was a German American printer and journalist in New York City. Zenger printed The New York Weekly Journal.[1] The first generation of American editors discovered readers loved it when they criticized the local governor; the governors discovered they could shut down the newspapers. The most dramatic confrontation came in New York in 1734, where the governor brought Zenger to trial for criminal libel after the publication of satirical attacks. The jury acquitted Zenger, who became the iconic American hero for freedom of the press.[2]

In late 1733, Zenger began printing The New York Weekly Journal, in which he voiced opinions critical of the colonial governor, William Cosby.[3] On November 17, 1734, On Cosby's orders, the sheriff arrested Zenger. After a grand jury refused to indict him, the attorney general Richard Bradley charged him with libel in August of 1735.[4]

Zenger's lawyers, Andrew Hamilton and William Smith, Sr., successfully argued that truth is a defense against charges of libel.[5]


Life

Johann Peter Zenger was born in 1697, the son of Nicolaus Eberhard Zenger and his wife Johanna. No baptismal record is known. His father was a schoolteacher in Impflingen in 1701. The Zenger family had other children baptised in Rumbach in 1695 and in 1703[6] and in Waldfischbach in 1706.[7] The Zenger family immigrated to New York in 1710 as part of a large group of German Palatines, and Nicolaus Zenger was one of those who died before settlement.[8] John Peter was bound for eight years as an apprentice to printer William Bradford of New York, where he learned his trade. By 1720, he was taking on printing work in Maryland, though he returned to New York permanently by 1722.[9] After a brief partnership with Bradford in 1725, Zenger set up as a commercial printer on Smith Street in Manhattan.[10]

Zenger married twice, to Mary White in 1719 at Philadelphia, and as a widower in 1722 to Anna Catharina Maul in New York. He was the father of six children by his 2nd wife.[11]

Zenger case

A page from Zenger's New-York Weekly Journal, 7 January 1733

In 1733, Zenger printed copies of a newspaper in New York to voice his disagreement with the actions of newly appointed colonial governor William Cosby. On his arrival in New York City, Cosby plunged into a rancorous quarrel with the Council of the colony over his salary. Unable to control the colony's supreme court he removed Chief Justice Lewis Morris, replacing him with James DeLancey of the royal party. Supported by members of the popular party, Zenger's New-York Weekly Journal continued to publish articles critical of the royal governor. Finally, Cosby issued a proclamation condemning the newspaper's "divers scandalous, virulent, false and seditious reflections."

Zenger was charged with libel. James Alexander was Zenger's first counsel, but the court found him in contempt and removed him from the case. After more than eight months in prison, Zenger went to trial, defended by the Philadelphia lawyer Andrew Hamilton and the New York lawyer William Smith, Sr. The case was now a cause célèbre, with public interest at fever-pitch. Rebuffed repeatedly by Chief DeLancey during the trial, Hamilton decided to plead his client's case directly to the jury. After the lawyers for both sides finished arguments, the jury retired—only to return in ten minutes with a verdict of not guilty.

In defending Zenger in this landmark case, Hamilton and Smith attempted to establish the precedent that a statement, even if defamatory, is not libelous if it can be proved, thus affirming freedom of the press in America; however, a general distaste for His Excellency William Cosby is the main reason why Zenger was found not guilty, and succeeding Royal Governors clamped down on Freedom of the Press up until the revolution. This case is the groundwork of the aforementioned freedom, not the legal precedent. [12] However, if they succeeded in convincing the jury, they failed in establishing the legal precedent. As late as 1804, the journalist Harry Croswell was prosecuted in a series of trials that led to the famous People v. Croswell. The courts repeatedly rejected the argument that truth was a defense against libel. It was only the next year that the assembly, reacting to this verdict, passed a law that allowed truth as a defense against a charge of libel.

"Cato" article

To better understand the significance of this historic case, it is important to examine an actual issue of the New York Weekly Journal prior to Zenger's arrest. Here we see a typical attack against the government in Zenger's original newspaper. Page one of this issue dated February 25, 1733,[13] carries an article under the pseudonym "Cato." This was a pen-name used by British writers John Trenchard and Thomas Gordon, whose essays were published as Cato's Letters (1723). Jeffery A. Smith writes that "Cato" was "the leading luminary of the 18th century libertarian press theory...Editions of Cato's Letters were published and republished for decades in Britain and were immensely popular in America."[14] This article gave its readers a preview of the same argument Attorney Hamilton and William Smith presented 18 months later in the government's libel case against Zenger—that truth is an absolute defense against libel. The words are reprinted from Cato's essay "Freedom of Speech is the Great Bulwark of Liberty":

A libel is not less the libel for being true...But this doctrine only holds true as to private and personal failings; The exposing therefore of public wickedness, as it is a duty which every man owwrong wrong wrong wrong wrong be a libel in the nature of things? It has been hitherto generally understood, that there was no other Libels but those against Magistrates and those against private men. Now to me there seems to be a third set of libels, full as destructive as any of the former can probably be, I mean libels against the people. Almost all over the earth, the people for one injury they do their governor, receive ten thousand from them. Nay, in some countries it is made death and damnation, not to bear all the oppression and cruelties, which men made wanton by power inflict upon those that gave it them.[15]

Death

John Peter Zenger died in New York on July 28, 1746, and is believed buried in Trinity Churchyard in Lower Manhattan. His widow continued the family business until Zenger’s eldest son, John, replaced his mother as head of the print shop in December 1748. John Zenger continued publication of the Journal for another three years.[16]

See also

Further reading

  • Copeland, David. "The Zenger Trial." Media Studies Journal 14#2 (2000): 2-7.
  • Covert, Cathy. "‘Passion Is Ye Prevailing Motive’: The Feud Behind the Zenger Case." Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly (1973) 50#1 pp: 3-10.
  • Eldridge, Larry D. "Before Zenger: Truth and Seditious Speech in Colonial America, 1607-1700." American Journal of Legal History (1995): 337-358. in JSTOR
  • Levy, Leonard W. "Did the Zenger Case Really Matter? Freedom of the Press in Colonial New York." William and Mary Quarterly: A Magazine of Early American History (1960): 35-50. in JSTOR
  • Levy, Leonard Williams, ed. Freedom of the press from Zenger to Jefferson: early American libertarian theories (Irvington Publishers, 1966)
  • Olson, Alison. "The Zenger Case Revisited: Satire, Sedition and Political Debate in Eighteenth Century America." Early American Literature (2000) 35#3 pp: 223-245. online

Primary sources

References

  1. ^ "7c. The Trial of John Peter Zenger". US History. Retrieved October 24, 2012.
  2. ^ Alison Olson, "The Zenger Case Revisited: Satire, Sedition and Political Debate in Eighteenth Century America." Early American Literature (2000) 35#3 pp: 223-245. online
  3. ^ "Peter Zenger and Freedom of the Press". Early America. Retrieved October 24, 2012.
  4. ^ "Zenger Trial". History Empire. Retrieved November 18, 2012.
  5. ^ Horton, Scott (2011-02-28) As a printer, he sometimes printed books and essays about freedom and liberty during the Revolutionary War. "The Obstinate Dr. Heicklen". Harper's Magazine. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  6. ^ Jones, Henry Z., Jr. The Palatine Families of New York 1710, Universal City, CA 1985, p. 1202
  7. ^ Jones, Henry Z., Jr. More Palatine Families, Universal City CA 1991, p. 381
  8. ^ Jones, PFNY 1710, p. 1123
  9. ^ Jones, PFNY 1710, p. 1124
  10. ^ http://www.nps.gov/feha/historyculture/the-new-york-weekly-journal-and-the-arrest-of-john-peter-zenger.htm
  11. ^ Jones, PFNY 1710, p. 1125
  12. ^ "Peter Zenger and Freedom of the Press". Earlyamerica.com.
  13. ^ Although this issue of Zenger's newspaper is dated 1733, the actual year was 1734. At the time, Britain and the colonies used a calendar system wherein January, February and part of March retained the preceding year's date. This system was eliminated in the 1750s.
  14. ^ Smith, Jeffery, Printers and Press Freedom : The Ideology of Early American Journalism: The Ideology of Early American Journalism, Oxford University Press, 24 May 1990, p.25.
  15. ^ William Lowell Putnam, John Peter Zenger and the Fundamental Freedom, Light Technology, 1997
  16. ^ http://www.immigrantentrepreneurship.org/entry.php?rec=8

Template:Persondata

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=John_Peter_Zenger&oldid=681372482"