Talk:Tori Amos: Difference between revisions
→Photo: leave it alone |
|||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
This picture is atrocious. I am sure there are tons of fans who have taken pictures of her in which she looks a lot better. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/173.77.139.152|173.77.139.152]] ([[User talk:173.77.139.152|talk]]) 22:44, 11 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
This picture is atrocious. I am sure there are tons of fans who have taken pictures of her in which she looks a lot better. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/173.77.139.152|173.77.139.152]] ([[User talk:173.77.139.152|talk]]) 22:44, 11 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:this is the same irrelevant discussion regarding the Kate Bush article..why these two? I wonder...it`s what she looks like..this is not a fanzine leave it alone..if it bothers you so much change it but stick to policy...the powers that be will have a problem with it otherwise..they love to argue rhetorical pseudo legality when it suits them or they have something to prove although what rock star is sleeping with what movie star doesn`t seem to be a priority with them..opposing academic careers politics or money maybe..i think she looks just fine the way she is.[[Special:Contributions/97.82.198.30|97.82.198.30]] ([[User talk:97.82.198.30|talk]]) 01:38, 17 September 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== External links modified == |
== External links modified == |
Revision as of 01:38, 17 September 2015
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tori Amos article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Index
|
|||
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
2014 new album
The new album will be released on Mercury Classics internationally and on Mercury Classics/Universal Music Classics in the US. - I doubt this is true. I watched a recent interview clip on Youtube where she mentioned another label. Also, it would be strange if she released a pop album on a classics label.(84.250.45.95 (talk) 07:08, 11 March 2014 (UTC))
Photo
Does she really still have that horrible "carroty" hair?? If not, I'd appreciate it a lot if someone had an alt photo to put in. This is just ... er ... unpleasant. -andy 77.190.58.4 (talk) 12:45, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- The infobox image is there to identify her and is not necessarily there to show what she specifically looks like today. Because she is alive we can only use a freely licenced image, so unless you can find a better portrait, it should stay for now. A performance image would make a poor substitute. Of the 300 or so freely licenced Flickr images I can only find lower quality performance images, usually where her face is obscured by a microphone where she is too small to extract a reasonable sized headshot, or from around the same time as this one with the same or very similar color hair. Good luck. ww2censor (talk) 15:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Amos' appearance has changed since that picture was taken. Still, its the best quality, most recent image we have. 12.217.185.194 (talk) 16:47, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- Yes please we need a new photo, this is horrible! If I find one, how can I submit it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.169.132.154 (talk) 21:15, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- It must be a verified freely licenced image. You cannot upload unless you are a verified registered user. ww2censor (talk) 22:45, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
This picture is atrocious. I am sure there are tons of fans who have taken pictures of her in which she looks a lot better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.77.139.152 (talk) 22:44, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
- this is the same irrelevant discussion regarding the Kate Bush article..why these two? I wonder...it`s what she looks like..this is not a fanzine leave it alone..if it bothers you so much change it but stick to policy...the powers that be will have a problem with it otherwise..they love to argue rhetorical pseudo legality when it suits them or they have something to prove although what rock star is sleeping with what movie star doesn`t seem to be a priority with them..opposing academic careers politics or money maybe..i think she looks just fine the way she is.97.82.198.30 (talk) 01:38, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Tori Amos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070913023518/http://everythingtori.com:80/go/book/ to http://everythingtori.com/go/book/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121019034727/http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/search/google/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=951854 to http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/search/google/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=951854
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:40, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Verified as working, turned sourcecheck to true Mburrell (talk) 05:41, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (musicians) articles
- Mid-importance biography (musicians) articles
- Musicians work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Rock music articles
- Mid-importance Rock music articles
- WikiProject Rock music articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- C-Class District of Columbia articles
- Mid-importance District of Columbia articles
- WikiProject District of Columbia articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Pop music articles
- Mid-importance Pop music articles
- Pop music articles