Jump to content

Talk:James T. Butts Jr.: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 87: Line 87:


::::Thanks {{ping|Stickee}}! I wasn't expecting such a fast response. You're probably right about the FAA, since it hasn't made a decision yet and it's not expected to be a problem. [[User:CorporateM|CorporateM]] ([[User_talk:CorporateM|Talk]]) 03:45, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
::::Thanks {{ping|Stickee}}! I wasn't expecting such a fast response. You're probably right about the FAA, since it hasn't made a decision yet and it's not expected to be a problem. [[User:CorporateM|CorporateM]] ([[User_talk:CorporateM|Talk]]) 03:45, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

==Storage==
*{{cite web | last=Moreno | first=Nereida | last2=Breeze | first2=Daily | title=Former San Jose schools chief tapped to run Inglewood Unified for state | website=Daily Breeze | date=September 17, 2015 | url=http://www.dailybreeze.com/social-affairs/20150917/former-san-jose-schools-chief-tapped-to-run-inglewood-unified-for-state | accessdate=September 21, 2015}}

Revision as of 19:36, 21 September 2015

Former good article nomineeJames T. Butts Jr. was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 5, 2014Good article nomineeNot listed
WikiProject iconBiography: Politics and Government Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group.
WikiProject iconCalifornia: Los Angeles Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).


Birthplace

user:Carcake1999 added that Mr. Butts was born in San Francisco without a source. user:ChamithN added a "citation needed". Unfortunately I haven't found a reliable source for his birth place, but his relative says he was actually born in Los Angeles, confirming the data on Zoominfo. Request that San Francisco be removed as un-cited per BLP, especially since it is likely factually incorrect. CorporateM (Talk) 21:32, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you nominated this article as a good article.Your nomination will fail immediately if the reviewer see "citation needed" tag.So if you can't find reliable sources(which means his exact birthplace is unknown)you should remove unverified content.-Chamith (talk) 21:49, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What about using a primary source verifying his birthplace in LA. The website says the birth records database was created by the California Office of Health Information and Research. That sounds reliable to me. CorporateM (Talk) 03:15, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah,I think that would be a good idea.The website seems genuine and reliable.I'll change the birth location right now because it's a good article nominee.Saying that he was born in San Fransisco is unverifiable,and readers might get confused.--Chamith (talk) 05:10, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, the GA criteria don't require a quick failure for citation needed tags, only section banners which appear to be justified. I'd be unhappy with a GA reviewer who upon seeing one or two {{cn}} tags chose to fail the article rather than note them in the review and require they be cleared up satisfactorily before passing. Protonk (talk) 19:57, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LA Business Journal

I recently obtained a PDF copy of a substantial profile in the LA Business Journal regarding Inglewood's turnaround that has quite a bit of information about Butts and his actions as mayor. I would like to propose the following additions using this source:

Additions
  • According to the <i>Los Angeles Business Journal</i> the city's biggest budgeting problem at the time was unfunded liabilities. For example, the city had an agreement with local unions that required the city to pay for benefits for the rest of an employee's life, even if they only worked for the city for a few years. Butts negotiated with unions to reduce it to 15 years with benefits that scale down over time in order to prevent the city from going into bankruptcy.<ref nam="labjjiu">{{cite news|title=Development: Inglewood works to pull in business|pages=2|date=July 7, 2014|first=David|last=Nusbaum|newspaper=Los Angeles Business Journal|accessdate=October 16, 2014|subscription=yes}}</reF>
  • During Butts' tenure as Chief of Police in Santa Monica, crime was reduced by 64 percent.<ref nam="labjjiu"/>
  • Butts and the City Council initiated a series of infrastructure repair and renovation projects. For example, $1.18 million was spent on sewer projects in comparison to $140,000 the prior year.<ref nam="labjjiu"/>

I've included excerpts from the source below for reference if needed, but I'd also be happy to provide the full story by email in PDF by request. CorporateM (Talk) 14:53, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Source material

"The turnaround started only a few years ago. James Butts Jr. said when he assumed office as mayor in February 2011, the city was facing an $18.6 million annual deficit and $316 million in unfunded liabilities.

“We were going to miss payroll that June,” said Butts. “The city had burned through $55 million in general fund reserves over the prior three years.” The City Council took drastic steps. City contractors were asked to take 10 percent off their contracts, employees were furloughed and dozens were laid off. Other steps included raising water rates, which hadn’t been increased since 2003.

The biggest challenge, however, was addressing unfunded liabilities, which were nearly four times greater than the annual general fund budget, which typically ranges between $79 million and $85 million. Employees who had worked for the city for as few as five years were entitled to health care for life, not only for themselves but a dependent. Inglewood was facing insolvency by 2017 if it couldn’t address those unfunded liabilities.

Butts renegotiated with unions, telling them that a deal with the city was better than any deal they might get out of bankruptcy court later. For example, health care coverage for retirees was capped at 15 years, with diminishing benefits over that span.

Butts, who holds an M.B.A. degree, spent 19 years in the Inglewood Police Department, rising to rank of deputy chief of police. In 1991, he was hired as police chief for the city of Santa Monica, which at that point had a higher crime rate than Inglewood. While he was in Santa Monica, the crime rate dropped 64 percent. After that, he worked in security at Los Angeles International Airport. He credits those experiences for learning what it takes to make economies flourish...

...With city finances stabilized, businesses did not have to fear that they would be taxed heavily. Also, Butts and the City Council have started making major infrastructure repairs. For example, the city spent only $140,000 on sewer projects in 2010-11 but this year will spend $1.18 million.

Inglewood struggled mightily in recent years, especially since its heyday as the home of the Los Angeles Lakers and Los Angeles Kings, both of which left the Forum for Staples Center in 1999. The city remains economically challenged. But the renovated Forum, which reopened early this year under its relatively new owner, Madison Square Garden Co., was a turning point, Butts believes...

...The Forum was only the beginning. In February, construction started at the $1.6 billion Hollywood Park Tomorrow project. Plans for the 238-acre site include a retail development with a 300-room hotel and 2,995 marketrate homes. They also include a complete renovation of the city’s largest taxpayer – Hollywood Park Casino, which will remain open during construction."

I have not (yet) looked at the material you suggested for inclusion (the "Additions"), but I think the following may be usable to complement the cite news: |newspaper=Los Angeles Business Journal and |url=http://www.labusinessjournal.com/news/2014/jul/07/inglewood-gets-down-business/ and |subscription=yes --82.136.210.153 (talk) 21:40, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Oops, looks like I was missing a couple citation parameters. CorporateM (Talk) 23:30, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I implemented the changes after reviewing them for neutrality. As always, I take full responsibility for edits I make under my name. It would help if you were a bit more careful about typos such as "ref nam="labjjiu" and "reF" --Guy Macon (talk) 03:25, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent updates

Trying to keep the article up to date while it's pending GA review and requesting his re-election be added with something like as follows:

  • "Butts was re-elected in November 2014 with an 83 percent vote, the largest ratio of supportive votes in the town's mayoral election history.[1]"

CorporateM (Talk) 22:53, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm having trouble with the link location. Googling, I find this address [1] seems to work. Other than that... BusterD (talk) 21:57, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Updates

A few suggested additions to keep the page up-to-date:

  • "He was elected to the board of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority in December 2014, succeeding Santa Monica Mayor Pam O’Connor.[2]"
  • “The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is currently evaluating whether the stadium would be an obstruction to air traffic, which is not expected to be a problem. In a 17-page report, Homeland Security said it could be a target for terrorist threats if a plane is crashed into the stadium. Aviation experts and Butts disputed the report’s claims.”[3]
  • “Butts and the city council approved a $50,000 reward in July 2015 for anyone with information leading to the person that decapitated a blind 75 year-old man.”[4][5]

References

References

  1. ^ "Butts Wins By Largest Margin in Inglewood Mayoral History". Inglewood Today. November 6, 2014. Retrieved November 7, 2014.
  2. ^ Green, Nick (December 11, 2014). "South Bay officials select Inglewood mayor to represent area on Metro board". The Daily Breeze. Retrieved March 20, 2015.
  3. ^ Times, Los Angeles (July 15, 2015). "FAA does routine study of proposed NFL stadium site in Inglewood near LAX". latimes.com. Retrieved July 27, 2015.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  4. ^ Press, Associated (July 1, 2015). "In case of blind Inglewood man found decapitated, city offers $50,000 reward". Daily Breeze. Retrieved July 27, 2015.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  5. ^ "$50,000 Reward Unanimously Approved For Information In Killing, Decapitation Of Inglewood Man, 75". CBS Los Angeles. June 30, 2015. Retrieved July 27, 2015. {{cite web}}: no-break space character in |title= at position 95 (help)CS1 maint: date and year (link)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by CorporateM (talkcontribs)

Done Done the MTA and stadium stuff, but left out the comment by the FAA as that seems inconsequential. Stickee (talk) 02:09, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Stickee:! I wasn't expecting such a fast response. You're probably right about the FAA, since it hasn't made a decision yet and it's not expected to be a problem. CorporateM (Talk) 03:45, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Storage