User talk:Serial Number 54129

Archives

No archives yet.

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		Thank you for defending me at WP:ANI against User:WordSeventeen. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:42, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

You were right.

and I was wrong. I think you may know what I'm talking about. You were absolutely correct in your assumptions. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 02:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Cheers User:78.26. Wasn't sure what you were referring to, as haven't edited for a couple of days, but think I've just found what you mean. Connected to a recent AN/I report, perchance? Thanks for your message in any case. Have a good (remainder of a ) weekend! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:03, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

You are as right now as you were then! . 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:05, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Remember the expression, even a stopped clocked is right twice a day! Guess that must be me: appreciate your message mate _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:11, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Judo do

Hello Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Judo do, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a test page. Although the author is going about things the wrong way, and currently seems to have thrown his toys out of the pram, there is a possible subject here and he should be given the chance to develop it if he can. The earlier "hoax" deletions were because of claims that it was an Olympic sport, but this seems to be a real, though doubtfully notable, variant of Judo. JohnCD (talk) 21:40, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Ed course pages

Hi there! I saw that you marked Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/North Dakota State University/PSYC 480 History and Systems of Psychology (Fall, 2015) for speedy deletion. I've undone this. That page is the on-wiki version of a course page for a course participating in Wiki Education Foundation's Classroom Program. Student editors in these classes are aware that their usernames and wiki activities are public, and we ask instructors to discuss with their students ahead of time the implication of choosing an identifiable or anonymous username. Thanks for looking out for malicious outing, though... it's definitely a problem in other contexts!--Sage (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:03, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Beaumont, 1st Viscount Beaumont, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lancastrian and Stand-off (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TeaLover1996

Sometimes when you look at a case that has been archived but there's no archive link, it's because of the Wikipedia software. All you have to do is use the purge link in your interface if you have one, or use the key combination that does the same thing in your browser. At that point, the link should just pop in and it will look normal. If it doesn't, don't manually edit the page. Instead, let an SPI clerk know of the problem. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:01, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Cheers User:Bbb23, I thought I was going mad! I'm sure it wasn't there when I posted that, and yet when I looked back through the history it was there all along! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 13:05, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Inappropriate comments

Could you please stop the unhelpful, inappropriate comments on Talk pages, SPI and the such; especially related to TeaLover1996. I have reverted many of your edits now and it's becoming disruptive. JMHamo (talk) 17:15, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Please desist from refactoring other users' edits. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:34, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Specifically stuff like - [1] JMHamo (talk) 17:39, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Did you get it? _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 18:06, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Karanvir Bohra's Signature.png

Hi, I just wanted to notify you I declined deletion of File:Karanvir Bohra's Signature.png. Signatures do not necessarily generate copyright, see WP:SLP, so this is not clear enough of a case for speedy deletion. You may want to take to WP:FFD for discussion though. Regards, Jujutacular (talk) 17:29, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, Jujutacular; it got trashed all the same, 06:19 this morning under G12. Ciao! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:47, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Fortuna! Jujutacular (talk) 17:21, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

I thought it was funny though, because by then it had no tag on it- and hadn't for many hours! Know what I mean? Cheers Jujutacular _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:26, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

It was actually re-tagged by another user :) Jujutacular (talk) 17:28, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Right, thanks!_Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:29, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Henry VI of England may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• became completely unresponsive to everything that was going on around him for more than a year. (Henry may have been suffering from a form of [[schizophrenia]], according to modern authorities, as

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:52, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 Done

Hello, I noticed that you deleted my edit. It is just that the ref that is on Hillsborough's article is not only undated, It is also no longer on Sheffield City Councli's Website. Croydon173314 (talk) 15:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

karan singh grover

can u please have a look at this page? digvijay and another editor is vandalising this page by continuing to remove valuable informationHollywoodbollywood22 (talk) 14:56, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

You will soon be reported to WP:3RR actually :) _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:58, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

this is ridiculous, why different rules for different pages? please have a look at how much well sourced and important information was removed on karan singh grover page and was called trivial why different rules for this page??Hollywoodbollywood22 (talk) 15:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

If you wish to dispute the content, fine- do so on the talk page in consensus with other editors. You are currently involved in an edit-war, and even if you think you are in the right, that is not how things are done around here! Cheers. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

please have a look at the page I have mentioned, and see how the user digvijay has removed loads of well sourced information and has violated the page? and then conveniently is calling me a vandaliser for kvb's page? it is a requestHollywoodbollywood22 (talk) 15:09, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Princess Johanna of Hesse and by Rhine

@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: Could you give Princess Johanna of Hesse and by Rhine a look over and add it to your watchlist? Paul Austin (talk) 15:45, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Paul, have done so; the article looks OK to me, or am I blindly missing something? -not an impossibility by any means! I will say that the '"Family curse" section seems not particularly relevant to her personally, but I wouldn't insist. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi}

My concern is, that as a number of Wikipedians have pointed out, Germany legally abolished royal and noble titles and styles in 1919, the Grand Duchy of Hesse ceased to exist in 1918 and i doubt that the Hesse-Damstadt family would have provoked the known anti-monarchical Hitler by giving her an overt royal title. Paul Austin (talk) 16:00, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Good point. It's out of my period I'm afraid but it is rather obvious now you come to mention it. So it should be moved to simply Johanna of Hesse and by Rhine then? _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:03, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

I think it should. Feel free to move or edit or change. She was never a Princess of Hesse and by Rhine. This is a relic of monarchist fanboys editing Wikipedia. She was never Princess Johanna. Paul Austin (talk) 16:10, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Paul- that's done. I guess the monarchists will go mad, if there's any still around. Does this affect any other articles do you know? -I'd expect so, but wouldn't know where to start! Anyone alive after 1919??? _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: from what i've seen, a lot of living German and Austrian members of former royal, grand ducal and princely families have Wikipedia articles calling them by titles which ceased to exist after WWI. Again, monarchists at work. Both Germany and Austria have not had royal and noble titles since c. 1919. Paul Austin (talk) 16:32, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Princess Johanna of Hesse and by Rhine

I undid the page move as the reasoning behind it is a clear violation of Wikipedia's policy for no original research: regardless of whether she was legally entitled to it or not, she did use the title of "Princess" and it is definitely part of her common name. German (non-)royals are even still using it today.Cebr1979 (talk) 18:57, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

You do not know what you are talking about. What they self-identify as is irrelevant. Cheers! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 19:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

No, it's not. Please review.Cebr1979 (talk) 19:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

This is to be discussed on the article's talk page, not here. Goodbye. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 19:03, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Reply to trolling

Sorry... do you think you can 'ban' people from your talk and carry on posting on others? Grow up. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 06:35, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Trolling this TP

Excellent work. We may have to nuke it from orbit though. Have a biscuit. -Roxy the dog™ (Resonate) 15:58, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

lolz etc _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 08:05, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

I knew I knew you from somewhere. I've had so much fun with Jeremy today, while making a point I believe is right, but I'll stop now. -Roxy the dog™ (Resonate) 23:21, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

thank you

@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: Thank you for being here for me. I've been given an off-wiki tongue lashing and been told I have to give Johanna the title of "Princess" and style of Her Grand Ducal Highness, neither of which she legally held, especially when you take into account the famously anti-Second Reich Hitler regime. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 11:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Well I think you're fighting the good fight Paul. Not that it should be a fight at all, but these monarchist-types are blinkered beyond recovery. They all want to live in the Middle Ages eh; I had one of them pissing over my TP the other day too. Anyway I personally suggests that whatever happens off-Wiki stays off wiki; they should sling it. Keep up the good work. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:25, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Your reversion on WP:ANI

I removed that on purpose. A sinebot of my signature isn't necessary for the edit that marked the discussion as resolved. I think you just reverted it by mistake (no big deal, it happens); I just wanted to give you a heads up and let you know :-) ~Oshwah~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:50, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

No worries User:Oshwah, just in case archive bot has problem without a time stamp. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Vandalism

Sorry for the things I've done in Colin Baker page. My purpose wasn't vandalism. I do translates from English to Turkish in trwiki, you can check this page. You can see my working pages like this in this my page. I've done nearly 45 translate and another ones are coming too. I was working on the Doctors' companions in the TV-series Doctor Who and I'm using my phone, not computer. Because of some reasons I don't know, my change in trwiki page suddenly became in enwiki page. I didn't want to do anything like vandalism. Have a nice day. Lmattdavidsmithl (talk) Lmattdavidsmithl (talk) 11:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jawad Botmeh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestinian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

¿Why?

Sorry, ¿why you deleted my message?.... it was incoherent.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ulof4 (talk • contribs)

Yes. That was why. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:15, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Karanvir Bohra

an edit war is going on that page, I was wondering if you could resolve it? the user digvijay seems biased towards the page, he/she has removed information from pages of his contemporaries but gets upset when the same is happened to this page! Don 05:09, 17 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Turehnde (talk • contribs)

:...reply to User: Turehnde.

Ha! Maybe need to put a File:Anti.svg over that. DMacks (talk) 15:31, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Right! Yes in matters of socks, precision is probably required! How do I use the .svg file, DMacks? Cheers _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:40, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

I uploaded it as File:No socks.png. Works equally well for the WP context and those who are barefoot. DMacks (talk) 16:09, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Many thanks! I was well proud of myself too, getting it centred, new text and all! Live and learn eh Cheers _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:12, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

So reverting

My changes to omallur were restructuring.... You accidentally reverted everything Blisspop 13:22, 21 September 2015 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rortosthanos (talk • contribs)

Not accidentally, I assure you. PLease provide reliable sources for any material you add. And please remember to sign your bloody comments. Cheers. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 13:23, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

I don't see why you can't respond in a polite way. Blisspop 15:59, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

What do you find impolite? And who the hell is Bisspop? _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:01, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Once again-the word 'bloody' doesn't need to be used and blisspop is my hat for all it matters to you Blisspop 17:46, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Well; if you used ~~~~ to sign your sodding posts, I wouldn't have to ask. Cheers! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:48, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Comment

Every so often I see you post an inscrutable comment. What is this supposed to mean? HighInBC ^{(was Chillum)} 15:40, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

HighInBC ...just sometimes better than confrontation. In that particular case, I wondered how the editor would respond. I'm not pro extremes of religion myself (or, realistically, religion at all); but if you look at some of his Userboxes, you might see what I mean. Examples: "This user is totally anti islam," "This user thinks psychopaths only use religion as pretext in order to fight," and "This user is for Race purity but is not racist," all seem unnecessarilly provocative and not sitting easilly within the framework of assuming good faith. Thanks for message: inscrutable = under-used word of the week! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:50, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Your comment makes a lot more sense now. Thanks for explaining. HighInBC ^{(was Chillum)} 16:02, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Cheers! In your professional opinion do you think they're suitable? (Re. perhaps a future WP:UfD?) _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:04, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

No I don't think they are suitable. A deletion discussion may be productive, though perhaps just asking them to take them down fist may be enough. HighInBC ^{(was Chillum)} 16:10, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Right, will do. Thanks! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:12, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

@HighInBC:, I attempted to raise the issue of the userboxes twice (here and here- both messages delated (as vandalism), a message banning me from his talk (so end of discussion, such as it was), and even an attempt to take me to AN/I (although only an attempt). So... how does one initiate an MfD for other editors' UBs? Can't find a straight forward guide to nominating a private userbox?

Cheers. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 13:15, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

I don't think this is a new user. I suspect that ANI may just handle this as a behavioural problem rather than a content issue. HighInBC ^{(was Chillum)} 14:25, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your advice Chillum... on a lighter note, when I saw you post under the modern moniker I thought you were a (new) user to liked get high in BC... _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:34, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

I've always thought Chillum was a toker.-Roxy the dog™ (Resonate) 16:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Around here, it would probably count as medicinal usage! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:11, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
14		Percy–Neville feud (talk)						Add sources
34		John Neville, 1st Marquess of Montagu (talk)						Add sources
11		Paul Murray Kendall (talk)						Add sources
29		Louis, Prince of Hesse and by Rhine (talk)						Add sources
1,442		Francisco Franco (talk)						Add sources
46		Henry Percy, 2nd Earl of Northumberland (talk)						Add sources
392		2014–15 India–Pakistan border skirmishes (talk)						Cleanup
15		Phineas Banning High School (talk)						Cleanup
51		NYC Ghosts & Flowers (talk)						Cleanup
91		Peace Companies (talk)						Expand
55		Dual monarchy of England and France (talk)						Expand
426		Dublin Airport (talk)						Expand
372		Economy of North Korea (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,213		Triskaidekaphobia (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
33		Famous Brands (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
424		Military activity of ISIL (talk)						Merge
40		Ein Karem (talk)						Merge
28		Maternal influence on sex determination (talk)						Merge
21		Catholic sexual abuse cases in Europe (talk)						Wikify
315		History of Palestine (talk)						Wikify
249		Al-Biruni (talk)						Wikify
2		Przegląd Tomistyczny (talk)						Orphan
3		Periyaoor (talk)						Orphan
2		Ayyapuram (talk)						Orphan
14		Anne de Beauchamp, 15th Countess of Warwick (talk)						Stub
24		Michael Hicks (talk)						Stub
5		G. L. Harriss (talk)						Stub
8		A. J. Pollard (talk)						Stub
2		Thalikkunu Shiva Temple (talk)						Stub
7		Charles Ross (historian) (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:22, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Friendly Notice.

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Signed,

NotAlpArslan (talk) 08:38, 22 September 2015 (UTC).

Please stop posting in my user page

Please to stop writing in user page, amically,
thank you
signed
NotAlpArslan (talk) 10:56, 22 September 2015 (UTC).

For the record, Fortuna has never posted on your User page. You must stop your silly behaviour or face banning from the project imho. Roxy the dog™ (Resonate) 11:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: your repeating baiting of this user is not constructive. Please stay away from them and their talk page, okay? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:50, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Please note that user is now blocked / UP blanked / and the cretinious ANI report dismissed with a boomerang. Thank goodness I didn't take your advice. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

User:MSGJ, no disrespect, but I advise you to keep well out of this. Defending this editor will not cover you with glory. It is not 'baiting' (whatever that is, outside of a playground). You would of course know that if you looked just slightly deeper into the situtation. Sorry to be robust, but I find your unfounded remarks extremely offensive. Thanks. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 12:57, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Agree with Fortuna totally. Look at the history, there isn't much. -Roxy the dog™ (Resonate) 13:00, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

• Note

1. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive899#User_by_the_name_of_ProKro_using_an_untolerable_language
2. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive899#Clear_vandalism_by_Kintetsubuffalo

Howvto use

Wiki Rehan Qasim Kumbher (talk) 13:27, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Not vandalism

Hi there Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. Thanks for your work patrolling. Please don't use the vandalism template for edits that are not vandalism, like you did here. There's a specific template for advert edits: {{Uw-advert1}}, and it's offered by Twinkle. If you're not finding what you need on the Twinkle selections, there's more options available at Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace. -- Diannaa (talk) 01:20, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

do wot That character whose username you suggested showed a CoI has already changed it once already. Fucking classic: Being discussed with the user. I hope!!! All the best, cheers. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 10:44, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

What happens to these is they go in the holding pen and get checked again in a week or two to see what they are up to. The vast majority (over 99 per cent) cease editing when they are made aware of the policy. Any who persist get blocked. I wish the folks doing the renaming would be a little more careful and make sure the new username does not also violate policy. Alas -- Diannaa (talk) 13:41, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Indeed Diannaa. Thanks too for pointing out that error and also for direction to that template page, very useful! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 13:49, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Username

I have to compliment you on the most awesome username I've come across at Wikipedia. My hat's off to you! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Dan. It makes me look cultured... but really I just used to like the Old Spice advert. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 12:32, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Terry Hurlock

You're very quick with the templates. How about some original thought? Can you explain what were the "bizarre unsourced alterations" that you think we are edit-warring about? 77.130.195.17 (talk) 18:05, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Mmmmm? "angering and alienating users and making this website a hostile and aggressive place to come." Who's the pot and who's the kettle?18:08, 23 September 2015 (UTC)