Talk:BBC Southern Counties Radio: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 21:23, 24 September 2015

BBC Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Radio Stations Unassessed

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Allison Ferns - delete?

Some has created an article on Allison Ferns, and I have nominated it for deletion. In case anyone else wants to contribute, the debate is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allison Ferns.--A bit iffy 08:03, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've just seen it's now been deleted.--A bit iffy 01:20, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, those who can't create, delete. I'm beginning to understand wikipedia now.--Fred FuManchu 07:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps Nathan James can be added to the travel readers page as a Surrey & Sussex travel reader as he's on nearly every morning and evening at the moment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.67.147.36 (talk) 18:19, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotect

Please unprotect, as warring parties Plantbirdlady (talk · contribs) and Igosaur (talk · contribs) are not around.

Thanks. CM (talk) 21:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. _Talk Islander 22:53, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Protection Required

Please protect this page again with presenters and on-air staff included in the Wiki article for BBC Southern Counties Radio. On-air staff deserve to be credited. It is only if the "non-notable" person has a Wiki page linked to them when the page needs to be removed. 86.151.115.174 (talk) 20:53, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No protection required. The IP is edit warring and may soon be blocked if they persist.Charles (talk) 21:06, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let's get another admin involved this as you seem to be doing this from your own opinion. On-air staff deserve to be included in the articles. Look at BBC London 94.9 for example. It's only fair you involve and discuss this with another admin. Many other articles include name lists. If you look at the notable rules, it will state that names lists are fine, but wiki pages for non-notable pages aren't. I suggest you get your facts straight and involve other admins before you upset more people. 86.151.115.174 (talk) 21:11, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the following that was said by another user who has been here way longer than you, 86.

“

Lists of people must meet the criteria listed at WP:LISTPEOPLE. Articles have been protected to prevent these additions, and/or the editors in question blocked when they persistently continue to reinsert inappropriate material. If a name is included in the article in this way, it has to show that it's subject to meet WP:LISTPEOPLE. Just because because they worked at a station, or currently work at a station, doesn't mean they are notable. When it is discussed between multiple users, the end result is the same; the names that don't meet WP:LISTPEOPLE are removed. Also, Wikipedia is not a directory. See here, here, and here for previous discussions about this.

”

In other wards, do NOT add non-notable people. Please stop adding these names until an article is created to establish their notability. Thanks. Corkythehornetfan 21:20, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, there NOT all over Wiki who have mentions in articles. This I am asking other admins to become involved with this battle as you seem to think you own Wikipedia when you DON'T. I have also reported you. 86.151.115.174 (talk) 21:23, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 :::{{centered pull quote|Lists of people must meet the criteria listed at [[WP:LISTPEOPLE]]. Articles have been protected to prevent these additions, and/or the editors in question blocked when they persistently continue to reinsert inappropriate material. If a name is included in the article in this way, it has to show that it's subject to meet [[WP:LISTPEOPLE]]. Just because because they worked at a station, or currently work at a station, doesn't mean they are notable. When it is discussed between multiple users, the end result is the same; the names that don't meet [[WP:LISTPEOPLE]] are '''removed'''. Also, Wikipedia is [[WP:NOTDIRECTORY|not a directory]]. See [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television Stations/Archive 9#Arguments for Excluding "Where Are They Now?"|here]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television Stations/Archive 10#Current on-air staff list discussion|here]], and [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television Stations/Archive 9#Alumni (and current staff) Lists|here]] for previous discussions about this.}}
 :::In other wards, do '''''NOT''''' add non-notable people. Please <u>stop</u> adding these names until an article is created to establish their [[WP:Notability (people)|notability]]. Thanks. <span style="background:#231F20; color:#FFFFFF; border:1px solid #231F20">Corkythe</span><span style="background:#BB8D0A; color:#FFFFFF; border:1px solid #231F20">[[User talk:Corkythehornetfan|<span style="color:white">hornetfan</span>]]</span> 21:20, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
+::::No, there '''''NOT''''' all over Wiki who have mentions in articles. This I am asking other admins to become involved with this battle as you seem to think you own Wikipedia when you '''''DON'T'''''. I have also reported you. [[Special:Contributions/86.151.115.174|86.151.115.174]] ([[User talk:86.151.115.174|talk]]) 21:23, 24 September 2015 (UTC)