Talk:2015 Umpqua Community College shooting: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Assessment: Oregon: class=Stub; +Universities: class=Stub (assisted) |
|||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:It is pretty clear there is some sort of agenda involved with those edits. The more recent reports are all agreeing on between seven to ten dead, but AMERIXANPSYCHO seems to think all of this is coming from CNN, which he/she doesn't seem to trust, even though many other reports are agreeing on that number. Also, he/she has been using an early Reuters report and nothing else for his/her reasoning. [[User:Versus001|Versus001]] ([[User talk:Versus001|talk]]) 19:56, 1 October 2015 (UTC) |
:It is pretty clear there is some sort of agenda involved with those edits. The more recent reports are all agreeing on between seven to ten dead, but AMERIXANPSYCHO seems to think all of this is coming from CNN, which he/she doesn't seem to trust, even though many other reports are agreeing on that number. Also, he/she has been using an early Reuters report and nothing else for his/her reasoning. [[User:Versus001|Versus001]] ([[User talk:Versus001|talk]]) 19:56, 1 October 2015 (UTC) |
||
::: Please do not make personal attacks here regarding "agenda." Stick to the sources and the revert rule.--[[User:jumplike23|JumpLike23]] [[User talk:jumplike23|(talk)]] 20:00, 1 October 2015 (UTC) |
::: Please do not make personal attacks here regarding "agenda." Stick to the sources and the revert rule.--[[User:jumplike23|JumpLike23]] [[User talk:jumplike23|(talk)]] 20:00, 1 October 2015 (UTC) |
||
:There's no "agenda", you conspiracy theorist. I just believe other more current news reports...such as <ref>http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/shooting-oregon-umpqua-community-college-article-1.2381711</ref>...not just Reuters [[User:AMERIXANPSYCHO|AMERIXANPSYCHO]] |
Revision as of 20:02, 1 October 2015
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2015 Umpqua Community College shooting article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Protection of some sort?
The vandalism on this page is crazy. it needs some sort of protection.Padsquad2010 (talk) 19:07, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
ITN nomination
FYI, I have nominated this article for In The News. The nomination is here. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:40, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Edit war
Both AMERIXANPSYCHO and Versus001 are involved in an edit war. I've warned both users. Hopefully they'll stop before an admin gets involved. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 19:53, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- I will stop editing- though I was right- the current count is up to 13 and will be confirmed as 15+ soon. AMERIXANPSYCHO
- It is pretty clear there is some sort of agenda involved with those edits. The more recent reports are all agreeing on between seven to ten dead, but AMERIXANPSYCHO seems to think all of this is coming from CNN, which he/she doesn't seem to trust, even though many other reports are agreeing on that number. Also, he/she has been using an early Reuters report and nothing else for his/her reasoning. Versus001 (talk) 19:56, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Please do not make personal attacks here regarding "agenda." Stick to the sources and the revert rule.--JumpLike23 (talk) 20:00, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- There's no "agenda", you conspiracy theorist. I just believe other more current news reports...such as [1]...not just Reuters AMERIXANPSYCHO
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Biography articles of living people
- All unassessed articles
- Stub-Class Crime-related articles
- Unknown-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- Stub-Class Death articles
- Unknown-importance Death articles
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Stub-Class Oregon articles
- Unknown-importance Oregon articles
- WikiProject Oregon pages
- Stub-Class Higher education articles
- WikiProject Higher education articles