Jump to content

Talk:Melipona quadrifasciata: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
VAD2015 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Update Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Washington_University_in_St_Louis/Behavioral_Ecology,_Biology_472_(Fall_2015) assignment details
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Brazil|class=stub|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Brazil|class=stub|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Insects}}
{{WikiProject Insects}}
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Washington_University_in_St_Louis/Behavioral_Ecology,_Biology_472_(Fall_2015) | reviewers = [[User:VAD2015|VAD2015]] }}
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Washington_University_in_St_Louis/Behavioral_Ecology,_Biology_472_(Fall_2015) | reviewers = [[User:VAD2015|VAD2015]], [[User:Raymundo.marcelo|Raymundo.marcelo]] }}


==Peer Review==
==Peer Review==

Revision as of 20:49, 1 October 2015

WikiProject iconBrazil Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconInsects Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: VAD2015, Raymundo.marcelo.

Peer Review

Great job with this article! The overview section was thorough and well written and I was intrigued from the beginning by the 'beautiful guard' fact. The biggest change I made was moving the picture to the main righthand box- I think it is more important to have a good picture there than one by the description section, but if you find another good picture definitely put it in. I also added more links throughout the page and changed some wording to make sentences flow better. The reproduction section is very informative and the human importance section does a good job of relating this page to the readers. If you are planning on making future changes to this page I would focus on adding more to the communication section and possibly a few more behavioral sections, but all together this is a great page so far. HBrodke (talk) 02:08, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review 2

Good job with the article. Everything was very well written and interesting from beginning to end. The parts that I really liked was the map of where they are and the differences between the worker and queen oviposition. I added a hyperlink for eusocial and italicized the title of the article since it a name of a species. If you plan to expand this article, I would focus on the communication section.VAD2015 (talk) 20:47, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]