Talk:Melipona quadrifasciata: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Update Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Washington_University_in_St_Louis/Behavioral_Ecology,_Biology_472_(Fall_2015) assignment details |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Brazil|class=stub|importance=low}} |
{{WikiProject Brazil|class=stub|importance=low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Insects}} |
{{WikiProject Insects}} |
||
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Washington_University_in_St_Louis/Behavioral_Ecology,_Biology_472_(Fall_2015) | reviewers = [[User:VAD2015|VAD2015]] }} |
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Washington_University_in_St_Louis/Behavioral_Ecology,_Biology_472_(Fall_2015) | reviewers = [[User:VAD2015|VAD2015]], [[User:Raymundo.marcelo|Raymundo.marcelo]] }} |
||
==Peer Review== |
==Peer Review== |
Revision as of 20:49, 1 October 2015
Brazil Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Insects Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: VAD2015, Raymundo.marcelo.
Peer Review
Great job with this article! The overview section was thorough and well written and I was intrigued from the beginning by the 'beautiful guard' fact. The biggest change I made was moving the picture to the main righthand box- I think it is more important to have a good picture there than one by the description section, but if you find another good picture definitely put it in. I also added more links throughout the page and changed some wording to make sentences flow better. The reproduction section is very informative and the human importance section does a good job of relating this page to the readers. If you are planning on making future changes to this page I would focus on adding more to the communication section and possibly a few more behavioral sections, but all together this is a great page so far. HBrodke (talk) 02:08, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Peer Review 2
Good job with the article. Everything was very well written and interesting from beginning to end. The parts that I really liked was the map of where they are and the differences between the worker and queen oviposition. I added a hyperlink for eusocial and italicized the title of the article since it a name of a species. If you plan to expand this article, I would focus on the communication section.VAD2015 (talk) 20:47, 1 October 2015 (UTC)