Jump to content

Talk:Liquid air: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
top: Boiling point is same as nitrogen
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
==Could use some restructuring==
==Could use some restructuring==
The '''applications''' section should really mention [[Grid energy storage]] (even if the relevant article has yet to highlight liquid air properly), as well as [[Air separation]]. So yeah reworking, separation into subsections [[User:VoidLurker|VoidLurker]] ([[User talk:VoidLurker|talk]]) 12:57, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
The '''applications''' section should really mention [[Grid energy storage]] (even if the relevant article has yet to highlight liquid air properly), as well as [[Air separation]]. So yeah reworking, separation into subsections [[User:VoidLurker|VoidLurker]] ([[User talk:VoidLurker|talk]]) 12:57, 7 June 2013 (UTC)


It might be worth noting the safety risks and benefits of liquid air in the article. The risks (primarily oxygen enrichment) have been stated above but one benefit, especially in the theatre context, is that it does not lower the concentration of oxygen in a room as it evaporates and therefore mitigates the suffocation risk associated with LN2[[Special:Contributions/66.38.56.124|66.38.56.124]] ([[User talk:66.38.56.124|talk]]) 14:50, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:50, 5 October 2015

Is this supposed to be relevant to a discussion on liquid air? The article title says "expert required" and refers here to talk page. What, in particular, are the needs of this article? Norm Reitzel (talk) 14:18, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Boiling / freezing points

The "exact" boiling and freezing points of liquid air, quoted as

Its freezing point is -216.7 °C and its boiling point is -194.35 °C.

have been modified to reflect the fact that liquid air is a mixture and does not have well defined boiling and freezing points. Norm Reitzel (talk) 14:34, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Liquid air does not have a boiling point/freezing point. By the way, I am an expert in chemistry.--J73364 (talk) 22:38, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@J73364: Then you know that air's boiling point is determined by the lowest boiling point of its constituents, which is nitrogen. Below that point, all of its constituents are liquid.
By the same logic, its freezing point should also be the lowest of any of its constituents; this happens to be oxygen. The figure quoted here (-215 C) does not match the figure given in liquid oxygen, which is -222.6 C. Of course, that same logic might not hold up; below nitrogen's freezing temperature (-210 C) you should get nitrogen crystals floating in liquid oxygen, except that there's much more nitrogen than oxygen. This might affect the crystal formation of the whole. (I'm an engineer, but not a chemist.) JustinTime55 (talk) 18:55, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Liquid air versus liquid nitrogen for cooling

Liquid nitrogen is a widely used commodity and has largely replaced liquid air for cooling because it is safer. Liquid air tends become enriched in liquid oxygen as it evaporates, which can cause explosions in contact with materials like carbon. When oxidizing, rather than cooling, properties are desired liquid oxygen is used instead. Therefore I doubt that liquid air would be used in theatrical fog making.CharlesHBennett (talk) 15:05, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have just located online information about the use of liquid air for theatrical fog effects. It seems it is accurate. [1]

Regards, Lindsay 149.254.58.79 (talk) 18:15, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could use some restructuring

The applications section should really mention Grid energy storage (even if the relevant article has yet to highlight liquid air properly), as well as Air separation. So yeah reworking, separation into subsections VoidLurker (talk) 12:57, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


It might be worth noting the safety risks and benefits of liquid air in the article. The risks (primarily oxygen enrichment) have been stated above but one benefit, especially in the theatre context, is that it does not lower the concentration of oxygen in a room as it evaporates and therefore mitigates the suffocation risk associated with LN266.38.56.124 (talk) 14:50, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]