User talk:Clpo13/Archive 10

Archive 5

←

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

→

Archive 15

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 365lax, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bethpage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Lee Tae-yong for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lee Tae-yong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Tae-yong until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 00:48, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gerald R. Johnson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pilot Wings (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
2		Jammalamadaka (talk)						Add sources
33		Ancestral Puebloan dwellings (talk)						Add sources
9		Basnet (talk)						Add sources
7		Within My Walls (talk)						Add sources
80		Nuclear safety and security (talk)						Add sources
12		Żarnowiec Nuclear Power Plant (talk)						Add sources
16		Petrunino Horo (talk)						Cleanup
324		Markandey Katju (talk)						Cleanup
46		John Woodvine (talk)						Cleanup
79		Economics of nuclear power plants (talk)						Expand
4		Timeline of Curitiba (talk)						Expand
8		Peter Apfelbaum (talk)						Expand
4,165		Google Search (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
94		Kemetic Orthodoxy (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
31		Sinagua (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
7		Sophia Polytechnic (talk)						Merge
87		Alureon (talk)						Merge
58		Secretary (title) (talk)						Merge
48		Garance Doré (talk)						Wikify
173		STM32 (talk)						Wikify
14		MYMO Wireless (talk)						Wikify
4		Bignall Hill (talk)						Orphan
8		Tassawar Khanum (talk)						Orphan
2		Johndale Solem (talk)						Orphan
174		Mathole Motshekga (talk)						Stub
3		Fitz Hughes Predators (talk)						Stub
4		Duvva (talk)						Stub
67		Jana Pallaske (talk)						Stub
7		Inoceramidae (talk)						Stub
1		Paladugu (talk)						Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:21, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Dixie

You have been blocked for 24 hours for a violation of the three revert rule on Dixie. Karl Dickman ^talk 07:34, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Clpo13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I admit, I got a bit overzealous with the reverting. After I realized it was unproductive, I stopped and pursued alternate channels to resolve the issue (such as WP:RPP). Considering how certain users feel about the issue, I'll avoid touching Self-arrest and Dixie as well as related talk pages. I'll take a day off, but I want you to know I understand I violated policy. clpo13_(talk) 3:39 am, Today (UTC−4)

Accept reason:

Unblocked with a note that this block should not have been made. NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:07, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

I don't think this was a policy violation, due to the following exception to WP:3RR:

3. Reverting actions performed by banned users, and sockpuppets of banned or blocked users..

Burninthruthesky (talk) 10:36, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

There's no need for you to stay away from Self-arrest or its talk pages. In fact, discussion is occurring right now at Talk:Self-arrest that will be useful for documenting consensus if another edit war flares up. I'm sorry the situation escalated to a block. Karl Dickman ^talk 16:52, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

This block should never have been made. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:04, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

My thanks and commiserations to you, clpo13. I feel awful about the fact that we were simultaneously drawn into a situation where quick decision making was called for, and the edit warring component was overstepped. Oh, well. We're both going to have to wear a block log 'badge of shame' as a reminder not to intervene in the future. :( --Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:44, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

@Iryna Harpy: I feel you. Poking my nose into trouble areas has always been a problem. These pages are going to need a lot of work but I'm not sure I want to get too involved, especially with an IP user who thinks it's his way or the highway. What a cluster. clpo13_(talk) 04:48, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

In all honesty, I don't want to involve myself any further. The only reason I got involved was due to the user's aggressive comment left on another editor's talk page. I've had enough experience to sense that there was more to it than simply breaching CIVIL and NPA. As it stands, I'm one of those gluttons for punishment who works in the most controversial areas of Wikipedia: true ARBCOM sanction territory from Eastern Europe, to the Balkans, to the Middle East. The last thing I need on my plate is more of the same. Best of luck in keeping your nose clean! Oooh, but it's so difficult to not poke one's nose in just for a peek... --Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:07, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rotem sivan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rotem sivan, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  GILO   A&E⇑ 22:59, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Sage Mason article

Hello, I'm not writing an autobiography about myself. I'm writing a biography about Sage Mason and the controversy surrounding his tenure at Phillips Exeter Academy. That is my only purpose for creating a wikipedia page, hence my username. Please don't delete. My article is intended to be informative but also helps generate publicity for my upcoming book.

Thanks, James Krakauer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sagearikmason (talk • contribs) 23:26, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Mario & Sonic at the Rio Olympic Games article

Just let me know if theirs anything else you want me to fix up in regards to the reference and or citations section of the "Mario & Sonic at the Rio Olympic Games" article as I'm still fairly new to the sites mechanics. Hollowsnow95 (talk) 00:15, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Request for edit

Hi! Thanks you for editing my recent Arthur Elsenaar entry. Before this article, I added an entry on artist Dani Ploeger, but this has been flagged as COI and notability has been questioned. As a curator, I do know the artist, so I guess it's a fair point. If you have time, would you be willing to look at the article and consider notability etc.? In its current state the article looks rather shabby, and since I'm not supposed to edit it anymore I would actually also be fine with deletion if nobody else feels it's relevant enough to look after. DX ArtMedia (talk) 09:40, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Maddox Wing Article

Hi, i recently created the article maddox wing and it was moved to draft due to lack of information. Id like to request a move back to mainstream, thank you.

Abdul Tahan (talk) 10:43, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Hey

Hey why you put my page for a youth radio station for speedy deletion im still creating it ??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benmarlow1 (talk • contribs) 16:49, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

about my article reference

Hello, I want to know about my article that our group wrote and it's not have reference, how can I do for the reference? thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by S23697 (talk • contribs) 07:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

@S23697: Check out the pages about what counts as a source and original research. clpo13_(talk) 07:56, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

@Cipo13: This article is my teacher's article that who no book print and not appear in website.He wrote this for more than 10 years but now he passes away. But his son want to do this for his father. how can I do in wikipedia, or if i create some website to reference it, I can answer wikipedia question? S23697 (talk) 10:38, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Friendly advice

Please do not advise editors that they can use WP:UNDELETE to request that pages that have been nominated for speedy deletion as you did here. This is against process and only causes more work for the adminstrators (and volunteers) to procedurally decline the request because the page is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator which does not apply in the case of the article you contacted Ememasco about (which was CSD:A7). If this bad advice continues, I will raise it as a concern to the administrators that regularly process the requests to determine if corrective action is warranted. Hasteur (talk) 14:15, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Action Hero. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Evaman, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Action Hero Shoot! 06:17, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Yes i un-reviewed it, but i didn't know that it will send an auotomatic message to you as if i am posting on your talk page with my signature--Action Hero Shoot! 06:33, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

@Action Hero: No worries. I didn't know that happened, either. clpo13_(talk) 06:35, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

My page Commander One

Hi! My name is Dasha. I see you checked my page Commander One. Please help me. What do I need to do to improve it and have it published?DashaG11 (talk) 09:08, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

@DashaG11: Hi Dasha. I'd advise you to take a look at the policy pages, such as those on reliable, secondary sources. I see there are references added, so that's a good first step. The next step would be making those into inline citations, so readers can verify any claims made. Also, try to expand the article beyond a list of features, such as adding in what the media is saying about the product. Notability is a big part of Wikipedia. It's not just a list of everything that exists. clpo13_(talk) 09:20, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

@Clpo13: Thanks! I made some changes. Is it better now?

What classifies as promotional content

Please tell us what exactly classifies as promotional content. we will make the edits accordingly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Priy.31288 (talk • contribs) 09:48, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Sonny Fredie Pedersen deletion

Hi Clpo13

Your account has deleted an article that was being created and wasn't finished. Is there a way to reopen the article so I can finish it?

Sonny Fredie Pedersen is a notable Danish celebrity — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaneKnowledge (talk • contribs) 20:48, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Advanced Center for Korean Studies

Our organization is non-profit research center concentrating on the thorough studies of Korean studies, we are also granted numerous historical materials by private sectors. I tried to acknowledge our organization to the academia so researchers who want to gather information concerning Korean studies could share our endeavors. Please undo your speedy deletion, I would be very much appreciated. Many thanks. Bo Seung Kang. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jabade (talk • contribs) 23:40, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

@Jabade: You'll have to talk to User:RHaworth about that. I tagged it for deletion, but RHaworth was the administrator who actually deleted it. clpo13_(talk) 02:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Removing a picture in Korea under Japanese rule

"Hello, I'm Clpo13. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Korea under Japanese rule without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. clpo13(talk) 15:21, 13 September 2015 (UTC)"

Hi, Cody I would appreciate if you can help me removing a particular picture in the article "Korea under Japanese rule." I can assure you that the picture of President Park Chung Hee posing as a Japanese officer is intended to undermine his and his daughter's--who is currently presiding over Korea--reputation. Explaining the entire story will be very difficult, but I will try to provide a sketch. The reason I believe so, and am quite convinced, is that, as you can clearly see from the title of the article in question, Koreans still hold a grudge against Japanese people. As a twentysomething adult who have spent a fair part of my life in Korea, the anger towards the Japanese is hardwired into our systems. The leftist parties in Korea have often used this hatred in instigating the public in order to gain political power. The current president of Korea is Park Geun Hae, who is the daughter of Park Chung Hee, the youth in the picture (which also "happens" to have his Japanese name in the caption). It is likely that for whatever reason, whoever put the picture in the article, which I think is absolutely unnecessary, has a certain political ulterior in deciding to do so.

So here is my reason for deleting the picture. In short: I think the picture was unnecessary. If you understand my concerns, I would appreciate if you can delete the picture for me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.71.20.184 (talk) 14:23, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

@180.71.20.184: I only reverted your edit because there was no explanation for removing content (such as in the edit summary). I'm not passing judgement on what should or shouldn't be on that page. If you want, you can bring this issue up on the talk page of the article for others to weigh in. clpo13_(talk) 06:18, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Hanchos

Well hello there Clpo13 I noticed that I have violated quite a few of wikipedia's codes of conduct(as it said,they are not rules) but I know now how things operate as I have just read the tutorials. I am new here and I would like to build a strong understanding of how I can also be a Wikipedia editor/writer (as I would put it) hanchos 00:03, 20 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanchos (talk • contribs)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for all you do. Wikipedia4you (talk) 20:58, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Much appreciated, Wikipedia4you. clpo13_(talk) 00:02, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

I just g0t a message that you just removed my link

Hi,

I have shared one external link on "Gastric bypass surgery article" but got a message that the link is removed. I have gone through guidelines but not getting the exact reason behind link removal. The link I have shared : http://www.londonobesityclinic.co.uk/weight-loss-surgeries/gastric-balloon.php

So it will be great if you let me know the reason so that i can avoid those mistake in future.

Best Regards, Sanjay Agrawal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr Sanjay Agrawal (talk • contribs) 05:34, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

@Dr Sanjay Agrawal: I removed the link initially because it appeared promotional in nature. After reviewing the link, I believe it provides useful information, so I have restored the link. clpo13_(talk) 05:38, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

thanks for your prompt response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr Sanjay Agrawal (talk • contribs) 05:41, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hey Clpo13, thank you for helping out in the edits for C-tru, and all the supplemental wiki information you gave. -Semyfayn — Preceding unsigned comment added by Semyfayn (talk • contribs) 17:41, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

@Semyfayn: You're quite welcome. clpo13_(talk) 22:13, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Clpo13, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and ‑Ugog Nizdast (talk) 05:23, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

APPROVE Kazmia Org

hi kindly approve kazmia Org — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baqirkazmi (talk • contribs) 07:57, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

@Baqirkazmi: You can contest the speedy deletion tag on the talk page. Also, please look into notability, especially for organizations. clpo13_(talk) 08:00, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

i have contest  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baqirkazmi (talk • contribs) 08:03, 23 September 2015 (UTC) 

Howard Lederer

Will it be OK if I add "Fraudster" instead of "Thief"?

Thank you for policing the internets! :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.164.189.40 (talk • contribs) 14:17, September 23, 2015‎

Only if you have a few reliable sources hidden up your sleeve. clpo13_(talk) 21:17, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

It's a clarification. The page creator literally identified it as a Galaxy-model airsoft MP5K-PDW on initial page creation. 2602:30A:2C5E:7760:2490:B00C:7C9B:8D38 (talk) 08:50, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Fine by me. Looks like the image has an Airsoft category. A clearer description on the Commons would have been nice, but oh well. clpo13_(talk) 08:52, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Some edits that you made this morning

I'm sorry, but there seems to be a problem with the edits you made to Lady Day, Fiscal year and Use (law). In the first article, you added the information that after the calendar change in 1752 Old Lady Day was 6 April. In point of fact, if you check the Calendar (New Style) Act 1750, you will see that eleven days were omitted. Setting a time line:

March 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 April  1  2  3   4   5
      +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6       +7 +8 +9 +10 +11

So Old Lady Day was 5 April.

In the second article you said that landlords and tax officials took advantage of the change to collect eleven days early. In fact that same Act of Parliament provided that the dates of collection should be retarded eleven days so that this did not happen.

In the third article, you said that in setting up a trust a property owner would transfer his property to the trustee on the basis that the trustee would transfer it to his children after his death. What is your source for that claim? Normally, someone who wanted to leave his property to someone other than the eldest son would set up a trust on the basis that he would continue to live in it until his death, when it would pass to his heirs. If the system were as you describe the trustee would move in so where would the family go? Are you expecting them to buy another house? What would be the point? 188.222.174.10 (talk) 16:21, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

First, I'm not convinced you're as new to this issue as you appear, and second, I did not change any information beyond reverting a WP:BLOCKed user in violation of his or her block. clpo13_(talk) 16:39, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) per WP:BLOCK When reverting edits, care should be taken not to reinstate material that may be in violation of such core policies as neutrality, verifiability, and biographies of living persons. Why did you choose to add back the incorrect information the editor had removed rather than AGF? 78.146.208.121 (talk) 18:01, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Check that verifiability policy again. The content changed at those articles was unsourced, probably WP:OR or WP:SYNTH. clpo13_(talk) 18:07, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

I've been blocking these IPs as they post, as it's the banned Vote (X) for Change. You can reply or revert them as you wish but be aware they're not above misrepresentation and outright lying and habitually try to represent their socks as other editors. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:15, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

I figured as much. Thanks for the heads up. clpo13_(talk) 18:16, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)There's something you're both missing. Clpo13 says The 5 April year end for personal tax and benefits reflects the old ecclesiastical calendar, with New Year falling on 25 March (Lady Day). He also says From 1753 until 1799, the tax year in Great Britain began on 5 April, which was the old style new year of 25 March. So first he says it ended on 5 April, then he says it began on 5 April. One of those statements must be wrong. 176.250.248.180 (talk) 18:41, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Maybe if there were clearer sources, this wouldn't be an issue. In any case, I said nothing of the sort. Stop putting words in my mouth. In fact, drop the subject here. Block evasion notwithstanding, that's a subject better-suited for the article talk page. clpo13_(talk) 18:45, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for restoring the correct version of Use (law). Now do you agree to the restoration of the correct versions of Fiscal year and Lady Day? 176.250.248.180 (talk) 09:44, 8 October 2015 (UTC)