Jump to content

Talk:Marvel Contest of Champions: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Character list: new section
Line 90: Line 90:


See [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games#Question_about_character_lists]] for rationale. Feel free to join the discussion. --[[User:Soetermans|Soetermans]]. [[User talk: Soetermans|'''T''']] / [[Special:Contributions/Soetermans|'''C''']] 10:10, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
See [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games#Question_about_character_lists]] for rationale. Feel free to join the discussion. --[[User:Soetermans|Soetermans]]. [[User talk: Soetermans|'''T''']] / [[Special:Contributions/Soetermans|'''C''']] 10:10, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

I have already answer you on your talk page...And no answer to my objections.

Revision as of 09:44, 10 October 2015

WikiProject iconVideo games: Esports C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the esports task force.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:
WikiProject iconComics: Marvel C‑class Bottom‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
BottomThis article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

spiderman is still playable like the other 3

screenshot in versus

will you stop now?

Krista031 (talk) 01:00, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Well, 1st of all. It's not "stop" because I'm not a child and it's not me against the world. I'm not in abuse, I'm not trying to have absolutely right. Probably you're right. Like dan61 said to you (and me), this is about sourcing the article. Someone else can come after me and undid what you done because of the lack of sources.

Here, I do not know what this screenshot is. Is it yours ? So tell us, because I find many promotionnals screenshots on google images, and this is not reality in the game. Hulk is a bot in this screenshot ? I do not know. And there is no proof for the others Hawkeye and Juggernaut. Many players has only the 7 one star which we agreed. You're the 1st one who will have this 4 players.

I insert a screenshot from the 7 characters playable in one star. This is from my account yesterday. I have erased my player's name and my alliance for obvious reasons. [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.157.66.190 (talk) 09:13, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For example, I have found a Thor One star. And you have never wrote about it. [2] For me, it's only a promotionnal screenshot but I may be wrong. What do you think about this Thor one star ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.157.66.190 (talk) 09:20, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Where are your sources? Or proofs? Did you go on kabam forum and got response from their team? If not, why you havent? Youve been here reverting my changes for a week.

You had a hunch that smth changed. Thats it. And you allow yourself to change this article. NOT WRITE IT, CHANGE IT. So there are 2 editors who said they are playable, and you as 1 person are still right.
In a mean time, before i managed to reply you, smbdy else already changed hawkeye and spideman back. So, now there are 3 of us. Will you change it again?

Furthermore, you asked me to give you a proof, and i posted an ss. Now you are questioning validity of that, and my candour with it. Then why you bothered to ask me in a first place?! Because you are bored? Im not. Really am not.
And there are not more of you, there is only you. I am not explaining this to other readers or editors, nobody in this argument but you and me. There are other ppl editing this, they wouldve joined so far if they wanted. Stop using plural.
Is hulk a bot in this picture?! Really?! Have you even played the game? And when you 'did' play, how many times your champ was on the right side in the battle?? Try to think before coming after someones integrity. Or just try to think. Anyplace. Anytime.

No, that is not my spiderman. Like a reasonable, logical being, after i seen that someone changed this article here, i asked my ally if they have one of the champs, and if they could try to play 1v1 with them. Only few people didnt sell those 1*s in my ally, but luckily one of them few had 2 of those and he sent me ss, which i posted here.
But being an awesome mate and even better human being, even i asked for only one ss, he sent me few of them ss1 ss2 ss3 ss4, apologized for late wolverine ss, and asked if i needed it better. I said no, cause i thought im dealing with a normal person. Honest mistake.

Ive done my elaborations. With even one ss, your whole theory falls, i really dont have to prove the others. That Thor i never seen, never heard about him, so i think its normal i never mentioned it, nor have i ever changed anything about him. Do try to contact kabam about that as well.

Now, im done writing to you. If you gonna ask for another ss, to prove every champ you think doesnt exist, exists, then you know where you can go.
I think ive proven more than i need, especially since i had to prove innocence in a first place. Meanwhile, ill keep changing it until i get blocked. Then im done with editing ever, ill die of heart attack before 40.
Auf wiedersehen, my french friend, hope you have a very lucky, lucky life.


Krista031 (talk) 21:25, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let's answer point by point

Where are your sources? Or proofs? Did you go on kabam forum and got response from their team? If not, why you havent? Youve been here reverting my changes for a week. I have nothing to proove. If you (or someone else) have these characters, it's easy to made the screenshot I've made.


You had a hunch that smth changed. Thats it. And you allow yourself to change this article. NOT WRITE IT, CHANGE IT. So there are 2 editors who said they are playable, and you as 1 person are still right. In a mean time, before i managed to reply you, smbdy else already changed hawkeye and spideman back. So, now there are 3 of us. Will you change it again? You know as well as me that you can change IP or go on another computer or smartphone in the same house. This is not an argument. The only argument is the source. If 3 persons change an article and say the Earth is the center of the universe, I will change what I think a mistake. It is the same for you. We live well in rich country and play games so we stay calm please ;)

Is hulk a bot in this picture?! Really?! Have you even played the game? And when you 'did' play, how many times your champ was on the right side in the battle?? Try to think before coming after someones integrity. Or just try to think. Anyplace. Anytime. you are not polite at all. Have you ever play with Thanos, adaptoid or ultron's drone ? This is the same. There are characters who are only for bots. That's all I wanted to say here.

No, that is not my spiderman. Like a reasonable, logical being, after i seen that someone changed this article here, i asked my ally if they have one of the champs, and if they could try to play 1v1 with them. Only few people didnt sell those 1*s in my ally, but luckily one of them few had 2 of those and he sent me ss, which i posted here.But being an awesome mate and even better human being, even i asked for only one ss, he sent me few of them ss1 ss2 ss3 ss4, apologized for late wolverine ss, and asked if i needed it better. I said no, cause i thought im dealing with a normal person. Honest mistake. You don't realize how you speak to someone else you don't know. You couldn't tell me those things in front of me. This is only a game and we have a discussion about it. You can't say anybody that is not normal. It's not polite. For your screenshots, you have forgotten the ally before the name of the players :) I've got a doubt. 2 things : 1-you are really honest and this is the end for spidey 1 star and Wolvy 1 star and I will let the change only for these 2 characters. 2-You absolutely want to have right and you made a little photoshop/paint on these pictures, which are pictures from bot and you've forgotten the ally. I will never know until I've got the same screenshot I've posted.

Ive done my elaborations. With even one ss, your whole theory falls, i really dont have to prove the others which theory ? And for the others, there is nothing and you know it. It's the same thing. If tomorrow, someone put Thor in one star, what will you do ?

I think ive proven more than i need, especially since i had to prove innocence in a first place. And I thank you for the time. But no one said you were guilty. At least, a little bit nervous ;)

Auf wiedersehen, my french friend, hope you have a very lucky, lucky life. Thanks for it but I've already got a lucky life ;) I could complain about Wolfgang Schauble but no history will judge him :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.157.66.190 (talk) 22:26, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Is Kang playable or not ?

Many removes because of this question. One player (Brutal DLX) has won Kang because he finished realm of legend. He's the only player who can play with Kang. So, some players think Kang is playable, other not. So the question is : Is one character playable with one player make him playable ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.157.66.190 (talk) 20:19, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Character list

See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games#Question_about_character_lists for rationale. Feel free to join the discussion. --Soetermans. T / C 10:10, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have already answer you on your talk page...And no answer to my objections.