Superparabola: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
{{Math|<center><b><math> z=\left\vert \text {sin}^{2/q} (u) \right\vert\text {sgn}(u)+ i \text{cos}^{2p} (u) ;</math> <math>-\pi/2\le {u} \le \pi/2</math></b></center>}} |
{{Math|<center><b><math> z=\left\vert \text {sin}^{2/q} (u) \right\vert\text {sgn}(u)+ i \text{cos}^{2p} (u) ;</math> <math>-\pi/2\le {u} \le \pi/2</math></b></center>}} |
||
Now, it is apparent that the generalized superparabola contains within it the superellipse, i.e., {{Math|<math>p=1/q</math>}} , and its generalization <ref name=" |
Now, it is apparent that the generalized superparabola contains within it the superellipse, i.e., {{Math|<math>p=1/q</math>}} , and its generalization <ref> Superellipse, Wikipedia < https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superellipse></ref> <ref name="new2"/> <ref name="new3"/>. Conversely, the generalization of the superellipse clearly contains the superparabola. Here, however, we have the analytic solution for the area under the curve. |
||
The '''indefinite and definite integrals''' are given by |
The '''indefinite and definite integrals''' are given by |
||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
=== History === |
=== History === |
||
The superellipse has been identified since 1818 as a Lamé curve. It appears that the superparabola was first identified by |
The superellipse has been identified since 1818 as a Lamé curve. It appears that the superparabola was first identified by Löffelmann and Gröller <ref name="new2">H. Löffelmann and E. Gröller, Parameterizing Superquadrics, Proc. (WSCG '95), 1995 (Winter School of Computer Graphics).</ref> <ref name="new3">Superquadrics, Wikipedia < http://wscg.zcu.cz/WSCG1995/papers95/Loffelmann_95.pdf ></ref> in their paper on superquadrics in conjunction with computer graphics. Waldman and Gray<ref name="Alex">C. H. Waldman and S. B. Gray, Superparabola and Superellipse in the Method of Archimedes. < http://curvebank.calstatela.edu/supercurve/supercurve.htm></ref> used the superparabola in their analyses of the Archimedean hoof <ref name="Alex"/> <ref name="ref2">S. B. Gray, D. Yang, G. Gordillo, S. Landsberger and C. Waldman, The Method of Archimedes: Propositions 13 and 14, ''Notices of the American Mathematical Society'', '''62'''(9), October, 2015, pp. 1036-1040. Photos courtesy of D. Yang</ref> <ref name="ref3">S. B. Gray and C. H. Waldman, Archimedes Reimagined: Derivatives from The Method., submitted for publication August, 2015 (Preprint available on request).</ref>. The “cylinderhoof”, "hoof" or "ungula" was first formulated in a letter from Archimedes to Eratosthenes in the 3rd century BC and led to the classic Propositions 13 and 14 of {{Math|{{math|<b><i> The Method </i></b>}}}} <ref>E. J. Dijksterhuis, Archimedes (with a new bibliographic essay by Wilbur R. Knorr), Princeton University Press, 1987, p. 313.</ref>. This letter now transposed in Dijksterhuis is one of the most famous exchange of ideas in all history of mathematics. In the progenitorial tradition, also dating over centuries, the superparabola has been named the Waldman-Gray curve. |
||
=== Applications === |
=== Applications === |
||
Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
<ref>E. W. Weisstein, CRC Concise Encyclopedia of Mathematics, CRC Press, 2003.</ref> |
<ref>E. W. Weisstein, CRC Concise Encyclopedia of Mathematics, CRC Press, 2003.</ref> |
||
<!--- After listing your sources please cite them using inline citations and place them after the information they cite. Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:REFB for instructions on how to add citations. ---> |
<!--- After listing your sources please cite them using inline citations and place them after the information they cite. Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:REFB for instructions on how to add citations. ---> |
||
2.Superquadrics, Wikipedia < http://wscg.zcu.cz/WSCG1995/papers95/Loffelmann_95.pdf > |
|||
=== References === |
=== References === |
Revision as of 20:16, 19 October 2015
This article, Superparabola, has recently been created via the Articles for creation process. Please check to see if the reviewer has accidentally left this template after accepting the draft and take appropriate action as necessary.
Reviewer tools: Inform author |
- Comment: I was actually going to accept this but thought it needs some more sources overall. SwisterTwister talk 07:26, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: Hello I see u need help inlineing your sources into the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Inline_citation Oo7565 (talk) 07:02, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
The superparabola is a geometric curve defined in the Cartesian coordinate system as a set of points (x, y) with
where p, a, and b are positive integers. The equation defines an open curve in the rectangle
− a ≤ x ≤ a, 0 ≤ y ≤ b.
The superparabola can vary in shape from a rectangular function (p = 0) , to a semi-ellipse ( p = 1/2 ), to a parabola (p = 1), to a pulse function (p > 1) .
Mathematical Properties
The area under a portion of the curve requires the indefinite integral
where the -component is zero by virtue of symmetry. Thus, the centroid can be expressed as one-half the ratio of the area of the square of the curve to the area of the curve.
The nth (mathematical) moment is given by
In general, integrals containing cannot be found in terms of standard mathematical functions. Even numerical solutions can be problematic for the improper integrals that arise when is singular at . Two instances of exact solutions have been found. For the semicircle , and the parabola , .
The arc length is for both and has a minimum value of at . The area under the curve decreases monotonically with increasing .
Generalization
Now, it is apparent that the generalized superparabola contains within it the superellipse, i.e., , and its generalization [1] [2] [3]. Conversely, the generalization of the superellipse clearly contains the superparabola. Here, however, we have the analytic solution for the area under the curve.
The indefinite and definite integrals are given by
where is a universal function valid for all and .
These results can be readily applied to the centroid and moments of the curve as demonstrated above by substitution of for .
History
The superellipse has been identified since 1818 as a Lamé curve. It appears that the superparabola was first identified by Löffelmann and Gröller [2] [3] in their paper on superquadrics in conjunction with computer graphics. Waldman and Gray[4] used the superparabola in their analyses of the Archimedean hoof [4] [5] [6]. The “cylinderhoof”, "hoof" or "ungula" was first formulated in a letter from Archimedes to Eratosthenes in the 3rd century BC and led to the classic Propositions 13 and 14 of The Method [7]. This letter now transposed in Dijksterhuis is one of the most famous exchange of ideas in all history of mathematics. In the progenitorial tradition, also dating over centuries, the superparabola has been named the Waldman-Gray curve.
Applications
The superparabola and its generalization have been applied to the Archimedean hoof. Briefly, the Archimedean hoof consists of a right cylinder with a footprint y = f(x) and height h that is cut by the plane z = h y . In the first image, the portion on the right is called the hoof, and is taken from the remaining half-cylinder leaving the complement . The base area, volume, and center of mass of both the hoof and the complement can be described solely in terms of the universal function, Ψ and height.[4] [5] [6]
3-D Printer Hoof | 3-D Printer Hoof | 3-D Printer Hoof Half-cylinder |
---|---|---|
[8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]
References
- ^ Superellipse, Wikipedia < https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superellipse>
- ^ a b H. Löffelmann and E. Gröller, Parameterizing Superquadrics, Proc. (WSCG '95), 1995 (Winter School of Computer Graphics).
- ^ a b Superquadrics, Wikipedia < http://wscg.zcu.cz/WSCG1995/papers95/Loffelmann_95.pdf >
- ^ a b c C. H. Waldman and S. B. Gray, Superparabola and Superellipse in the Method of Archimedes. < http://curvebank.calstatela.edu/supercurve/supercurve.htm>
- ^ a b S. B. Gray, D. Yang, G. Gordillo, S. Landsberger and C. Waldman, The Method of Archimedes: Propositions 13 and 14, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 62(9), October, 2015, pp. 1036-1040. Photos courtesy of D. Yang
- ^ a b S. B. Gray and C. H. Waldman, Archimedes Reimagined: Derivatives from The Method., submitted for publication August, 2015 (Preprint available on request).
- ^ E. J. Dijksterhuis, Archimedes (with a new bibliographic essay by Wilbur R. Knorr), Princeton University Press, 1987, p. 313.
- ^ < http://www.cs.drexel.edu/~crorres/Archimedes/contents.html >
- ^ < https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwidw12kctI >
- ^ < http://www.archimedespalimpsest.org/ >
- ^ < http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/history/Curves/Curves.html >
- ^ G. S. Carr, Formulas and Theorems in PURE MATHEMATICS, 2nd ed., Chelsea Publishing Co., New York, 1970. Reprint of Carr's 1886 edition under the title of A Synopsis of Elementary Results in Pure Mathematics, London and Cambridge.
- ^ P. Lynch, Sharing a Pint, ThatsMaths, 2012 < http://thatsmaths.com/2012/12/13/sharing-a-pint >
- ^ A. Bellos, Alex's Adventures in Numberland, Bloomsbury, UK, 2011.
- ^ K.B. Oldham, J. Myland, J. Spanier, An Atlas of Functions, 2nd ed, Springer, 2010.
- ^ E. W. Weisstein, CRC Concise Encyclopedia of Mathematics, CRC Press, 2003.