Talk:Two-spotted bumble bee: Difference between revisions
m Xerylium moved page Talk:Twospotted bumblebee to Talk:Two-spotted bumble bee: Incorrectly formatted name |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I will be expanding this article for a behavioral ecology class.[[User:Xerylium|Xerylium]] ([[User talk:Xerylium|talk]]) 20:08, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Xerylium |
I will be expanding this article for a behavioral ecology class.[[User:Xerylium|Xerylium]] ([[User talk:Xerylium|talk]]) 20:08, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Xerylium |
||
==Peer Review== |
|||
Nice job on this article. The right hand box is very informative and I appreciate that you took the time to find a picture, distribution map, and the conservation status. I changed a few words in the overview section to cut down on repetition, and I also added sentence that was previously in the taxonomy and phylogeny section (about names). I moved the first sentence of the taxonomy and phylogeny section to the identification section since I think it is more relevant there. The taxonomy and phylogeny section could also use some more information about the genus, family, etc. and what characterizes each of these divisions. |
|||
Good job on the identification as well as the distribution and habitat sections. I like the detail you used and the pictures are very helpful. Colony cycle also has good information, but try and split up the text into two or more subsections. I rearranged a couple more sentences in the foraging section as well as the predators section to make everything easier to read. I would also advise adding more information to the phoresy section. [[User:HBrodke|HBrodke]] ([[User talk:HBrodke|talk]]) 15:40, 21 October 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:40, 21 October 2015
Insects Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
I will be expanding this article for a behavioral ecology class.Xerylium (talk) 20:08, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Xerylium
Peer Review
Nice job on this article. The right hand box is very informative and I appreciate that you took the time to find a picture, distribution map, and the conservation status. I changed a few words in the overview section to cut down on repetition, and I also added sentence that was previously in the taxonomy and phylogeny section (about names). I moved the first sentence of the taxonomy and phylogeny section to the identification section since I think it is more relevant there. The taxonomy and phylogeny section could also use some more information about the genus, family, etc. and what characterizes each of these divisions.
Good job on the identification as well as the distribution and habitat sections. I like the detail you used and the pictures are very helpful. Colony cycle also has good information, but try and split up the text into two or more subsections. I rearranged a couple more sentences in the foraging section as well as the predators section to make everything easier to read. I would also advise adding more information to the phoresy section. HBrodke (talk) 15:40, 21 October 2015 (UTC)