Talk:Two-spotted bumble bee: Difference between revisions
→Peer Review 2: new section |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Good job on the identification as well as the distribution and habitat sections. I like the detail you used and the pictures are very helpful. Colony cycle also has good information, but try and split up the text into two or more subsections. I rearranged a couple more sentences in the foraging section as well as the predators section to make everything easier to read. I would also advise adding more information to the phoresy section. [[User:HBrodke|HBrodke]] ([[User talk:HBrodke|talk]]) 15:40, 21 October 2015 (UTC) |
Good job on the identification as well as the distribution and habitat sections. I like the detail you used and the pictures are very helpful. Colony cycle also has good information, but try and split up the text into two or more subsections. I rearranged a couple more sentences in the foraging section as well as the predators section to make everything easier to read. I would also advise adding more information to the phoresy section. [[User:HBrodke|HBrodke]] ([[User talk:HBrodke|talk]]) 15:40, 21 October 2015 (UTC) |
||
== Peer Review 2 == |
|||
Overall this article was very well written. I only added a hyperlink to Gelsemium sempervirens. Other than that I did not see anything that needed to be drastically improved. Good job.[[User:VAD2015|VAD2015]] ([[User talk:VAD2015|talk]]) 06:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:34, 23 October 2015
 | Insects Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
I will be expanding this article for a behavioral ecology class.Xerylium (talk) 20:08, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Xerylium
Peer Review
Nice job on this article. The right hand box is very informative and I appreciate that you took the time to find a picture, distribution map, and the conservation status. I changed a few words in the overview section to cut down on repetition, and I also added a sentence that was previously in the taxonomy and phylogeny section (about names). I moved the first sentence of the taxonomy and phylogeny section to the identification section since I think it is more relevant there. The taxonomy and phylogeny section could also use some more information about the genus, family, etc. and what characterizes each of these divisions.
Good job on the identification as well as the distribution and habitat sections. I like the detail you used and the pictures are very helpful. Colony cycle also has good information, but try and split up the text into two or more subsections. I rearranged a couple more sentences in the foraging section as well as the predators section to make everything easier to read. I would also advise adding more information to the phoresy section. HBrodke (talk) 15:40, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Peer Review 2
Overall this article was very well written. I only added a hyperlink to Gelsemium sempervirens. Other than that I did not see anything that needed to be drastically improved. Good job.VAD2015 (talk) 06:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)