Talk:Parsnip/GA2: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
GA review |
Cwmhiraeth (talk | contribs) Response |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
#:A. Has an [[Wikipedia:LAYOUT#Standard_appendices_and_footers|appropriate reference section]]: {{GAList/check|?}} |
#:A. Has an [[Wikipedia:LAYOUT#Standard_appendices_and_footers|appropriate reference section]]: {{GAList/check|?}} |
||
#:: Some of the [http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/webchecklinks.py?page=Parsnip external links] could use access dates. Also, the last one is broken. |
#:: Some of the [http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/webchecklinks.py?page=Parsnip external links] could use access dates. Also, the last one is broken. |
||
#:::Done. They all work for me. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 09:13, 25 October 2015 (UTC) |
|||
#:B. Cites [[WP:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]], [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria/where necessary|where necessary]]: {{GAList/check|n}} |
#:B. Cites [[WP:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]], [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria/where necessary|where necessary]]: {{GAList/check|n}} |
||
#:: One "citation required" |
#:: One "citation required" |
||
#:::New source found. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 09:13, 25 October 2015 (UTC) |
|||
#:C. [[Wikipedia:No original research|No original research]]: {{GAList/check|y}} |
#:C. [[Wikipedia:No original research|No original research]]: {{GAList/check|y}} |
||
#:: |
#:: |
Revision as of 09:13, 25 October 2015
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 03:09, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A tasty article, full of flavour
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Some of the external links could use access dates. Also, the last one is broken.
- Done. They all work for me. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:13, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Some of the external links could use access dates. Also, the last one is broken.
- B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:
- One "citation required"
- New source found. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:13, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- One "citation required"
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused (see summary style):
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- All images are appropriately licensed.
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail: