Jump to content

Talk:Long Beach State Dirtbags baseball: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Jrcla2 moved page Talk:Long Beach State 49ers baseball to Talk:Long Beach State Dirtbags baseball: Per naming convention; this is their OFFICIAL nickname
Line 17: Line 17:


[[Special:Contributions/173.196.196.178|173.196.196.178]] ([[User talk:173.196.196.178|talk]]) 00:59, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
[[Special:Contributions/173.196.196.178|173.196.196.178]] ([[User talk:173.196.196.178|talk]]) 00:59, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

== Official vs. Common nickname ==

{{ping|Jweiss11|MisterCake|Billcasey905|Rikster2|Ejgreen77|Bagumba|Jrcla2}} You are all being pinged due to your experience. I've already talked with DL.

The team is referred to as the "Dirtbags" [http://www.longbeachstate.com/sports/m-basebl/lbst-m-basebl-body.html] however, the '''official''' name, ''and'' as the rest of the athletic dept. goes by, is the [[Long Beach State 49ers|Long Beach State '''''49ers''''']]. So, should we go by the ''official'' name (49ers) or should we keep them as the Dirtbags? "Dirtbags" may be the more [[WP:COMMONNAME]], but I'm thinking that official name should be used. I don't know much about this topic so that is why the discussion has been started. <span style="background:#231F20; color:#FFFFFF; border:1px solid #231F20">Corkythe</span><span style="background:#BB8D0A; color:#FFFFFF; border:1px solid #231F20">[[User talk:Corkythehornetfan|<span style="color:white">hornetfan</span>]]</span> 20:01, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:01, 27 October 2015

WikiProject iconBaseball: College C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject College baseball (assessed as High-importance).
WikiProject iconCalifornia C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.


Under construction

As you can tell, this page is still under construction. I'm basically writing the thing from scratch, and it's sort of on hold for the moment. Still technically in the works though. Just thought I'd offer some sort of explanation for the emptiness since Seancp added a link from the CSULB article and added it to the college baseball project. --Foolishgrunt (talk) 17:34, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like its going to be an excellent article! If you need some ideas or assistance then come on over to the college baseball project. Also, here are probably the two best college baseball team articles on Wikipedia in case you were looking for some ideas: Miami Hurricanes baseball and LSU Tigers baseball. Also check out: Wikipedia:WikiProject College baseball/Articles for a more thorough list. Seancp (talk) 17:57, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Biggest single-season turnaround?

I'm thinking the Dirtbags' turnaround of 14-45 in '88 to 50-15 in '89 stands a good chance to be the biggest single-season turnaround in NCAA baseball history, but I can't prove it and I don't know where to find that kind of information. Numerous Google searches turned up no relevant information, at least in the realm in college baseball. If anybody can point me in the right direction, I'd be glad for the help.--Foolishgrunt (talk) 06:45, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, ESPN.com has a piece on the Dirtbags and how they came to be. Article might confirm your assertion about the 14-45 to 50-15 turnaround. Article also states that "Dirtbags" is the official name of the team now.

http://espn.go.com/blog/playbook/fandom/post/_/id/19140/how-long-beach-state-became-dirtbags

173.196.196.178 (talk) 00:59, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Official vs. Common nickname

@Jweiss11, MisterCake, Billcasey905, Rikster2, Ejgreen77, Bagumba, and Jrcla2: You are all being pinged due to your experience. I've already talked with DL.

The team is referred to as the "Dirtbags" [1] however, the official name, and as the rest of the athletic dept. goes by, is the Long Beach State 49ers. So, should we go by the official name (49ers) or should we keep them as the Dirtbags? "Dirtbags" may be the more WP:COMMONNAME, but I'm thinking that official name should be used. I don't know much about this topic so that is why the discussion has been started. Corkythehornetfan 20:01, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]