Jump to content

Talk:Ribosome: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
reply
Line 27: Line 27:


== dead link ==
== dead link ==

The first external link seems to be broken.
The first external link seems to be broken.
Please remove the following:
Please remove the following:
Line 33: Line 32:
[[User:Iakov Davydov|Iakov Davydov]] ([[User talk:Iakov Davydov|talk]]) 08:47, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
[[User:Iakov Davydov|Iakov Davydov]] ([[User talk:Iakov Davydov|talk]]) 08:47, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
:Thanks for spotting this. I have removed the link. [[User:GrahamColm|Graham Colm]] ([[User talk:GrahamColm|talk]]) 11:06, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
:Thanks for spotting this. I have removed the link. [[User:GrahamColm|Graham Colm]] ([[User talk:GrahamColm|talk]]) 11:06, 4 March 2013 (UTC)


== Introduction ==

Shouldn't "intercellular" in "Ribosomes are often embedded in the intercellular membranes that make up the rough endoplasmic reticulum" be replaced by "intracellular"?
--[[User:Seadogburger|Seadogburger]] ([[User talk:Seadogburger|talk]]) 11:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


== Ribosome structure ==
== Ribosome structure ==

I suggest to move the whole section on structure to a new page. There is plenty of more information to be incorporated, so this will eventually become unwieldy. [[User:Peteruetz|Peteruetz]] ([[User talk:Peteruetz|talk]]) 14:52, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
I suggest to move the whole section on structure to a new page. There is plenty of more information to be incorporated, so this will eventually become unwieldy. [[User:Peteruetz|Peteruetz]] ([[User talk:Peteruetz|talk]]) 14:52, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

==Ribosome: structure and function, molecular device/machine==
==Ribosome: structure and function, molecular device/machine==
I just found a good review about these aspects of ribosome:
I just found a good review about these aspects of ribosome:
Line 61: Line 50:
| pmid = 22577819
| pmid = 22577819
}}</ref>
}}</ref>

[[User:Kazkaskazkasako|Kazkaskazkasako]] ([[User talk:Kazkaskazkasako|talk]]) 18:19, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
[[User:Kazkaskazkasako|Kazkaskazkasako]] ([[User talk:Kazkaskazkasako|talk]]) 18:19, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

==References==
<!--Please keep this section at the bottom-->
{{reflist}}


== Deletion ==
== Deletion ==
Line 77: Line 61:


:I agree with you. It's also tantamount to gibberish. [[User:Graham Beards|Graham Beards]] ([[User talk:Graham Beards|talk]]) 22:53, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
:I agree with you. It's also tantamount to gibberish. [[User:Graham Beards|Graham Beards]] ([[User talk:Graham Beards|talk]]) 22:53, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
== Introduction ==
Shouldn't "intercellular" in "Ribosomes are often embedded in the intercellular membranes that make up the rough endoplasmic reticulum" be replaced by "intracellular"?
--[[User:Seadogburger|Seadogburger]] ([[User talk:Seadogburger|talk]]) 11:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
:Yes, thank you for pointing this out. [[User:Graham Beards|Graham Beards]] ([[User talk:Graham Beards|talk]]) 17:15, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

==References==
<!--Please keep this section at the bottom-->
{{reflist}}

Revision as of 17:15, 1 November 2015

Template:Vital article

Former good articleRibosome was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 23, 2005Good article nomineeListed
January 25, 2006Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Template:WP1.0 Template:Archive box collapsible

The first external link seems to be broken. Please remove the following: 70S Ribosome Architecture Animation of a working ribosome. Requires the Chime browser plugin from this site (where registration is required). Iakov Davydov (talk) 08:47, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for spotting this. I have removed the link. Graham Colm (talk) 11:06, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ribosome structure

I suggest to move the whole section on structure to a new page. There is plenty of more information to be incorporated, so this will eventually become unwieldy. Peteruetz (talk) 14:52, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ribosome: structure and function, molecular device/machine

I just found a good review about these aspects of ribosome: [1] Kazkaskazkasako (talk) 18:19, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

This non sequitur at the end of the structure section has been deleted for lack of context or explanation and weasel wording.

"It should be noted that the production of the component parts of the ribosome from a messenger RNA molecule is rather strongly isomorphic with the self-replication model of von Neumann."

173.25.54.191 (talk) 22:26, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you. It's also tantamount to gibberish. Graham Beards (talk) 22:53, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

Shouldn't "intercellular" in "Ribosomes are often embedded in the intercellular membranes that make up the rough endoplasmic reticulum" be replaced by "intracellular"? --Seadogburger (talk) 11:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you for pointing this out. Graham Beards (talk) 17:15, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Moore, Peter B. (2012). "How Should We Think About the Ribosome?". Annual Review of Biophysics. 41 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-050511-102314. PMID 22577819. Retrieved 2014-09-19.