User talk:73.172.68.191: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:58, 12 November 2015

Help me! I added a proposal that had been ignored in a list presented in the text. I did not use any emoji as suggested. I cited sources in the text. I do not know why my suggestion was deleted. The only reason I can think of is bias.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

My proposed addition was deleted.

Please help me with.my proposed edit. I added to a list of proposals for a Jewish State an American Proposal of January 21, 1919 that was not listed. It had been overlooked. It frequently is. It took me many years of study to find it. I cited three sources for it. I did NOT use emoji as has been suggested. I cited the sources in the text as I could not add them where indicated. I believe my addition was very constructive. Wallace Edward Brand webrand1021@comcast.net..

73.172.68.191 (talk) 00:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you're asking about this edit. I don't see any sources cited in the text, and even if there were references I don't see how it's relevant to the article you added it to. Huon (talk) 01:17, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

I am looking for help!
Ask your question below. You can also check Help:Contents and the FAQ, or ask at the Help desk or the Teahouse.
Users who monitor the category Wikipedians looking for help and those in Wikipedia's Live Help have been alerted and will assist you shortly. You can also join the chat room to receive live Wikipedia-related help there. You'll be receiving help soon, so don't worry.
Note to helpers: Once you have offered help, please nullify the template using {{Tl}} or similar, replace with {{Help me-helped}}, or where {{Help me|question}} was used, use {{Tlp}}/{{Tnull}}

I added three sources in the box that was indicated to receive them. They are

1. David Hunter Miller, My Diary at the Conference of Paris, Vol. iv, pp. 263-264. Full text. Scroll down to DOCUMENT 246 263 ♦26. PALESTINE. *78 2. J.C. Hurewitz (ed.), The Middle East and North Africa in World Politics: A Documentary Record, Vol. 2, British-French Supremacy, 1914-1945 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979), p. 103. 3. www.eretzyisroel.org/~samuel/americandraft.html

These can easily be moved to the text.

The proposal is pertinent because the page indicated it had listed all the proposals made for a Jewish State or homeland. These list one proposal that wasn't in the list.

It is extremely pertinent because it is the proposal that was adopted by the Allied Principal War Powers at San Remo in the second paragraph of subpart (b) and is detailed in the Palestine Mandate that is the trust set up to carry out the policy that was adopted at San Remo.

Please help me with...

73.172.68.191 (talk) 16:58, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]