User talk:Onel5969: Difference between revisions

Onel5969's Talk
Onel5969's Talk
	Phoenix ... It's a dry heat ...
Born	New York city
Nationality	American

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 16:17, 14 November 2015

Please click here to leave me a new message. Please leave your username, and a link to the article it refers to, if you have a question.

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

Edit count

edit count

Wiki mark-up link

Hi! You might find these handy:

Simple guide to Wikipedia mark-up
- Advanced guide to Wiki mark-up

Cheers! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 22:35, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting advice or help

My page for the Zola Story was denied and I was wondering if you could give a hand? I edited it some more and resubmitted it, probably should have waited again. --Matt723star (talk) 04:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Matt723star, well, first you should understand that twitter and TMZ are not reliable sources, so they add nothing to the article, except for the purpose you have them for, and that's to verify the tweets themselves. Second, take a look at WP:CIT on how to properly format citations. Third, your large quote blocks need to be trimmed way back. Finally, I don't think the story is notable enough. Part of notability is that it is not temporary. In two months, this story will be forgotten. Sorry, but I hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

07:06:49, 31 October 2015 review of submission by Gracielle1

Gracielle1 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Mirchi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi! Can you give suggestions on what to do or add in the article for it to be be approved. Hope you could assist me on this. Thanks and regards.

Hi Gracielle1 - First, the sources you use don't show the notability of the restaurant. Brief mentions, short articles, and listings do not show notability, they merely show the restaurant exists. You'll need 3 in-depth articles from reliable, independent sources about the restaurant to show it is notable. Second, your article has a slight promotional tone. For example, "Authentic spices are used to complement rather than to overshadow the other ingredients. A show kitchen, contemporary decor and a superb menu are all available to bring a one-of-kind experience to customers" is pure promotion. Good promotion, since it makes me want to eat there, but still promotion. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:45, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 14:52:10, 31 October 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by TeamJFH

TeamJFH (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Jakarta Fashion House (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi. I had a go at submitting an entry for a business here in Indonesia but was rejected as I was told it sounded like more of an advertisement rather than to your standards. I'm super new to this and was trying to get this entry in based on similar businesses here. Is there any writers that can maybe check what I;ve done and point out the corrections? Sorry to ask, just not sure how to get it accepted.

Thx for your time all the same Neill

TeamJFH (talk) 14:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TeamJFH - First off, your user name presents two issues. First, it sounds as if there might be more than one person using the account, which is a no-no. Second, it sounds as if the account might be affiliated with the subject of the article, which means you have a conflict of interest. Please go to the link, and see what declarations you should be making.

Now, about the article, don't sell us the product, tell us about the company. Don't talk about brands, lines, desires, business plans/models, featrues, etc. The Indonesian fashion section needs to go away, only include stuff like that in relation to the company, and back it up with reliable, independent sources. I hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:44, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

− Great work on the creation of the article John Kelly (actor, 1901-1947), which came to my attention because I watch an article about a film in which he appeared. Many thanks. However, it looks like you used a special character for the hyphen in the date 1901-1947 in the title. That means that links work, because you used the same character when linking, but one can't go to the John Kelly article by typing the title because that character is not on keyboards. Any chance of a fix? Akld guy (talk) 20:24, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Akld guy - Yup, there's a fix. I used an existing editor's suggestion for the disambiguation, since there is more than one actor with this name, but I never checked WP:NCPDAB. According to that, a range should not be used, simply the year of birth, so I'll go and make those changes. Thanks for the catch (and the compliment)! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:31, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Thanks for your prompt attention. Oh, and sorry about posting on your user page instead of here on your Talk page. I knew better but it was morning and I hadn't had my first shot of coffee for the day. Akld guy (talk) 22:05, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Allegra Versace

If you want to, you can take a look at the article about Allegra Versace. That article is this weeks TAFI.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:17, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BabbaQ - Thanks for the heads up. And always feel free to make suggestions here. But please don't get annoyed if I don't work on one of your suggestions. In this case, this article has zero interest for me. But if it had been something I was interested in, I definitely would have made an attempt to contribute. Cheers! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

22:44:34, 2 November 2015 review of submission by Leahnaz

Leahnaz (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Bmai (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Onel5969,

Thank you for your feedback again. I've made significant edits to the draft article and removed a lot of sentences that might be seen as advertising language. I've deleted most of the reviews section, but can also remove it if you think it would be more appropriate. Can you take a look at it when you're free and let me know what you think? I would like to resubmit it for review soon and would like your opinion before I do. Thanks a lot for your help, I believe I'm getting a better sense of how to edit Wikipedia articles. Leahnaz (talk) 22:44, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Leahnaz - Better, but still promotional. Readers don't care that "products at extremely reasonable costs", buyers do. There are still numerous selling points like that throughout the article. I know it's hard, because you care about the subject, but it has to be neutral. The reviews section is okay now, but the products and services is still quite promotional. Rule of thumb is that if the product isn't notable on its own, it probably should only get a mention, with a brief description if warranted. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Maia_Chung

Hi!

Can you please help me with that article?

Actually I have really problems to finish it and we need at as not-for-profit organization.

I need some more assistance.

Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcadforg (talk • contribs) 04:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mcadforg - what type of help do you need. The article was declined because some of it was simply cut and paste from two other websites. You simply need to delete that stuff and write about the content in your own words. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs

Thank you for review

Hello Onel, thank you for reviewing the article of AUCA, and the link is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:AUCA. Thanks for your comment and I will rewrite it about the promotional sentences. This website is established in this year by a small company, so maybe we didn't have so many reliable sources except blogs and references we have provided. Our team are trying our best but it do need time to achieve it. I didn't mean to offend you, and I read your comment carefully, so does it mean that small websites like us has the slightest possibilities to be shown on Wikipedia? Hope you are well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anne Harper (talk • contribs) 08:02, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anne Harper - no offense taken. Wikipedia has specific guidelines on what is, and is not, notable. The general guidelines may be found at WP:GNG, while more specific guidelines for companies and organizations may be found at WPNCORP. Blogs, in gerneral, are not valid references, since there is no editorial oversight. Likewise sites like Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, etc. To show notability, you'll need to have about 3 articles which go in-depth about the company, not mere mentions, listings, etc. Additionally, references have to be independedt of the subject, so you can't use the company's own website to show notability. Finally, articles need to be written in a neutral tone, without any advertising. Your article currently has a promotional tone, talking about customer needs, etc. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:10, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

from Svartalxeym

Hi. Thank you for the message. The previous user had told me that I need tu use more sources for submission of the article for the review. Now you are this is not notable. The guy has exposed high level corruption at the embassy and many media outlets have published it, including Radi Free Europe. What else is needed it to be notable? Is there anything clear way that the author should take??

Regards, Svartalxeym user

link of the article - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Anar_Hasanov — Preceding unsigned comment added by Svartalxeym (talk • contribs) 09:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Svartalxeym - SwisterTwister rightly asked you to provide more sources so we could evaluate the article better. However, now that the article is properly sourced, it seems pretty clear to me that this is a case of WP:BIO1E, since outside of that incident, he's led a pretty non-notable life. In addition, the article is very one-sided, giving the appearance that this guy is completely correct. Not saying he's not, but the charges don't appear to have been validated (and they may never be if there is that much corruption). Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:44, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for review

Respected Mr. Onel5969, Devsena Mishra is my first article, I'll try to further improve it. Best Regards, vishalgauravjh1Vishalgauravjh1 (talk) 15:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent Vishalgauravjh1 - my suggestion is to go through the WP:Articles for creation process, where experienced editors can help you craft the article. It's a process, so be patient. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:45, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Mr. Onel5969, Thank you so much for your response, in future I'll definitely follow the process suggested by you, I lost my article Devsena Mishra, I'll try to create that again using WP:Articles for creation process. Best Regards, vishalgauravjh1Vishalgauravjh1 (talk) 15:58, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Onel5969. You have new messages at Northamerica1000's talk page.
Message added 10:30, 4 November 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:30, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 13:40:57, 4 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by LW1588

LW1588 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Kirk Ke Wang (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

If I edit the article, simplify the citation, would you review and help me to publish it? TLW1588 (talk) 13:40, 4 November 2015 (UTC)hank you. LW1588 (talk) 13:40, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I'll help you with the article. Can't promise it will get published, haven't really evaluated it regarding notability yet (because of the Citekill issue). But once you work on the citations, I'll be more than happy to take another look. Regarding the citations, rarely are more than 2 ever needed, so where you have more than 2, pick the best 2 (from the most reputable source and the most in-depth), and also please take a look at WP:CIT on how to format citations. Here are some other helpful links you might want to look at:

Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:55, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sofia

Hi, Onel5969!

I just followed your advices about the view of collage in Sofia and the opinions of other editors there and I uploaded a new mosaic in Common, which I present in the talk page of the article. Regards!--Stolichanin (talk) 18:22, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

deprod

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Cheerleader Diaries, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Steve Mendez, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!

2602:30A:2EFE:F050:A51D:74AE:FC51:1E65 (talk) 19:18, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Superparabola Draft

Hello,

We believe we have solved all the issues regarding the references for the Superparabola draft page.

Take a look!

Thank you so much.

-Shirley Gray -Cye Waldman -Alexander Morales — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sibgray (talk • contribs) 22:10, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Superparabola Page

Hello,

Its wonderful to see the article has been published.

We wonder if there was a way to control the width of the page such the content appears closer together. Currently the content looks terrible on a big screen, but looks much better on a smaller screen.

do you have suggestions regarding this?

Thank you!

Shirley Gray
Cye Waldman
Alexander Morales — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.182.29.8 (talk) 22:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I don't, but you can ask at the math project page (there should be a link on the article's talk page). Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:41, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

did you receive draft for Keith Schooley?

Hi - I sent it to you on October 24 for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Keith_A._Schooley but haven't heard anything back. It was the draft with what I hoped were the corrections you asked for. Did you receive? If not I can resend but please give me an exact location to copy and paste it. Sandbox does not necessarily appear for me. Thanks so much. Hillary Chase chasehillary@gmail.com Hillary Chase (talk) 23:33, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hillary Chase - Yes I received it, and I responded shortly after. Please do not cut and past pages on someone else's talk page. It causes quite a bit of clutter. In addition, the changes you made were incorrect. Here is a link: User:Onel5969/sandboxNewbie. Click on that link, and do the editing there. Save as often as you like, and it will notify me that you've edited the article there. In that location we can both work on it. Then when it's ready, I'll move it to the draft space, and you can resubmit it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:11, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

10:03:14, 5 November 2015 review of submission by HayC2

HayC2 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Richard Duncalf (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there, thank you for reviewing my draft. I had some trouble providing secondary sources. Could you give me guidance on which of my citations are not considered verifiable? Any help would be much appreciated. Many thanks. (HayC2 (talk) 10:03, 5 November 2015 (UTC)))[reply]

Hi HayC2 - First, links to advertising sites shouldn't be used. Second, the article is about the person, but most of the citations is about the company. There are a few which simply mention the subject. Interviews, by their very nature, are primary sources, and can't be used for notability purposes. In additon, the last citation, the interview, also appears to be a PR piece. Beware of sources which list websites and contact information for the company, those are usually PR's put out by the company and passing as news articles. Also, if you find citations for him, please see WP:CIT on how to properly format citatiosn. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:06, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks Vishalgauravjh1 (talk) 15:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Vishalgauravjh1 - good luck with the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:06, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not interested

Thank you for your message. I have ceased to edit Wikipedia (and in fact no longer refer to it, as I can find less biased sources) because of what I see as its deep-rooted anti-business and anti-"capitalist" attitudes. Those who are into this sort of thing can go and play with themselves to their hearts' content. But I don't care. Please do not communicate with me again 121.98.66.193 (talk) 20:08, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What a maroon. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:42, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 22:23:41, 5 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by LW1588

LW1588 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Kirk Ke Wang (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for the reviewer. I will take your suggestions, edit the article, and resubmit it.LW1588 (talk) 22:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC) LW1588 (talk) 22:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, LW1588 Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:05, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

keith schooley draft

Hi, sorry for the confusion. I didn't receive your message so am not sure how I incorrectly made the changes you'd asked for. I went to sandbox and saw draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Keith_A._Schooley but not further instructions on how to correctly edit and resubmit the citations and references. If you could kindly reexplain and send to chasehillary@gmail.com I'd very much appreciate it. Thanks again. Hillary Chase Hillary Chase (talk) 02:44, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hillary Chase - Don't go to Sandbox. Click on THIS LINK. It's a page I created specially to work on your article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:07, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for your work in relisting AfD discussions, which helps to keep matters in order. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:13, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Northamerica1000 - Just doing what I can. I would close some obvious delete discussions, but I don't think I can, not being an admin. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:08, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For info. about non-admin closures, some of which are allowed, check out WP:NACD. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:23, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for that Northamerica1000 - but part of the process when closing a discussion as delete is to delete the article. My understanding is that only admins can do that, so how could I close a discussion with a delete result? Am I missing something? Sorry to be so dense. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:24, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See point #2 of WP:NACD. Also, non-admins can close AfD discussions for articles that were deleted in instances when the deleting admin did not close the discussion. This occurs sometimes when articles are speedy deleted. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

sysop or admin. or not

Friendly(talk page stalker)
Hi Bil! Have you considered applying to be one, I wonder(?) — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 12:01, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gareth Griffith-Jones - I have considered it. I think I could be of a bit more assistance if I could do certain tasks, such as the deletion question above. If an existing admin were to nominate me, I would most likely accept and go through the RFA process (which I understand can be pretty unnerving). A year ago I don't think I would have been ready, and would probably have taken it personally. Btw...long time no speak, o original wiki-mentor of mine... how have you been? I've been trying to make you proud of your apprentice.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:24, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You would make an admiral admin, in my opinion. Regularly I keep an eye on both of your pages (User & Talk) and on the STiki Leaderboard. Your workrate amazes me, together with your thoughtfulness and good common-sense at all times.
Yes, I am proud of you.
I do not have much available spare time to devote to WP because of real life demands. I may not have told you; my wife has Parkinson's and, a couple of years ago or more, it reached quite an advanced stage.
I am fine, thank you. No health problems, thank God.
Hope you have a lovely Sunday! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 08:21, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So sorry to hear about your wife, that's a tough ticket. I will keep the both of you in my thoughts and prayers. There's a stiki leaderboard? Why? I think it's been a trip as I've gotten to understand more of the workings underlying the project, and how to not take things personally. Regardless, always wonderful to hear from you. Take care. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:46, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated.
I was surprised, and a little concerned too, when I discovered it. It does bear the risk of misunderstanding amongst some of the younger users. If you click on the link I have just provided, you will see that you are 14^th—nudging me for my position. "Such fun!" — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 10:20, 9 November 2015 (UTC)‎[reply]

Wow. Look at that. Perhaps I spend too much time working on vandalism?

- Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help with AfC Submission for Bullhorn, Inc.

Hi Onel5969 - I'm writing about an article for creation submission that you reviewed on 5 November for Bullhorn, Inc. Thanks for the review. I've made deliberate attempts to ensure that the content is purely factual and cited from independent sources, so I'm hoping you can help me understand where in the article you think that might not be the case. I've made some minor edits to try and address a couple places that you might have been concerned with, but thought it was worth checking with you directly before resubmitting the draft.

The article can be found at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Bullhorn,_Inc.

Thanks for any help you can provide. TigersTale00 (talk) 19:39, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TigersTale00 - When you tell a reader why the product benefits its users, gives them insights, etc. That's selling the product. When you talk about how a company positioned itself, that's promotional. There's also an issue regarding notability. Take a look at WP:NCORP, and then at WP:ROUTINE. Most of your articles would fall into the latter category, being routine announcements and notices in trade magazines. The St. Louis article would be nice, if it were in-depth, but it's just another brief announcement. No one is saying that the article isn't factual. But an article can be factual, and still be promotional. It's short, to the point, and well structured, and I especially appreciate the way you've taken the time to properly format the citations (that's a pet bugaboo of mine). The company exists, the company is well run -- but is it notable? Can you find some non-Boston articles which talk about the company (not press releases)? That would help. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:18, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Amit Jain

Hi, I reverted vandalism to the lead paragraph of Amit Jain. I then trimmed your PROD nomination accordingly. However, perhaps you'd better take another look to see whether you still think it should be deleted. – Fayenatic London 22:14, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fayenatic london - Thanks for the heads up, and yes, I'll let it stand. My point was that regardless of which person the article was speaking of, neither appeared to meet the notability standards. There is a person of this name who might pass notability standards, as they are the head of Uber India, but this actor passes neither WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. But again, I really appreciate the heads up. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:21, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

15:56:19, 8 November 2015 review of submission by Holanthony

Holanthony (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Celeste Star (actress) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi!

Why isn't the article on Celeste Star considered "notable"? I've added info about her appearances in mainstream media as well as all the nominations received. As I understand it, these are criteria for a person from the adult industry being considered "notable" enough for Wikipedia.

Holanthony (talk) 15:56, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Holanthony - As I said in my comments on the draft, she doesn't meet the notability standards for an adult film actress, and her mainstream film resume is too slim to meet WP:NACTOR, but it might be a case of WP:TOOSOON, and if her mainstream credits increase she might qualify. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:32, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keith schooley draft

Hi... I went to the link as you suggested for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Onel5969/sandboxNewbie and I see my draft. But for starters, somehow it manages to contain two references for citation 3 which I don't remember making (end of first paragraph and beginning of second) and I don't find any suggestions on how to fix what you had said was wrong. I must be missing something on my end or just don't know how to find your information. I'm sorry to keep asking but not being experienced on Wiki I'm not sure what I did wrong or how to fix it. My article is finished but the citations/references appear to be incorrectly done. May I ask you to pretty please fix these for me-- otherwise I am at a standstill, not understanding how to get these reference marks inserted properly. As always thanks for your help. Hillary Chase chasehillary@gmail.com Hillary Chase (talk) 21:10, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hillary Chase - I'll work on it this week, as time allows. I'll let you know when it's finished. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request help on improving rejected submission on Wikipedia page

Dear Onel5969, Thank you for your feedback. I have submitted a Wikipedia page draft for my company INKONIQ, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:INKONIQ and you have rejected citing it as highly promotional. I have done extra research on all Wikipedia guidelines and then submitted it after getting it reviewed on the Wikipedia Live chat. I have checked Wikipedia pages of other companies working in the similar domain and found their pages more promotional. Kony Inc has mentioned their services and technologies, while Fueled has got references like Alexa ranking and company website. please find their links below. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kony,_Inc. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fueled

I have refrained from posting anything about services and technologies and company offerings. I have put a lot of effort on this, could you please guide me where you find my page promotional. With your help, I would like to improve it and make it live. Roshivijay (talk) 05:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Roshivijay - phrases like "with a team of talented co-founders", "a posh neighborhood", "been associated with top companies", and "have been showcased" are phrased in promotional language. Comparing it to other companies is irrelevant (see WP:OSE. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:59, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mayabazar

I've nominated this article for FAC which also happens to be my first attempt. It is also the first Indian Telugu film article to be nominated for such status. If interested, please leave your comments here. All constructive comments are welcomed. Yours sincerely, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Onel5969. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

AfD discussion

Sorry, but I had to revert your keep close at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Identifying and Managing Project Risk. The discussion does not qualify for a keep close per your withdrawal of the nomination, because outstanding delete !votes from other users are present in the AfD discussion. See WP:SKCRIT criteria #1 for more information. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:23, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, Northamerica1000 - I thought I might have screwed the pooch when I did it. Thanks for fixing it.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:01, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keith Schooley draft

Thank you!!! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Onel5969/sandboxNewbie ; chasehillary@gmail.com; Hillary Hillary Chase (talk) 16:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TAFI

If you want to, take a look at the article about Marie Serneholt which is this weeks TAFI article. Regards.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Wong draft

Hi there!

My username is hillcoulson and I am trying to get up a Wiki page on my boss Eric Wong, the Executive VP / General Manager of Island Records. Here is a draft of the article in question: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Eric_Wong

My draft keeps getting rejected on the basis of my sources & references' reliability. It's a bit frustrating because my sources are as reputable as they get within the music industry (Billboard, Hollywood Reporter, Artist Direct, Allmusic) and I have added all of the possible sources that feature Mr. Wong and his work. What can I do to improve the reliability of my sources and get this article published? Thanks in advance for your help.

Update 11/10: Don't mean to come across as rude but don't multiple features in Billboard's 40 Under 40 count as notable coverage? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hillcoulson (talk • contribs) 20:51, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Best, Hill — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hillcoulson (talk • contribs) 22:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hillcoulson - Hi, I see you've resubmitted it, so let's see what another editor has to say. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:06, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Diwali

Happy Diwali!!!

Sky full of fireworks,
Mouth full of sweets,
Home full of lamps,
And festival full of sweet memories...

Diwali

Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous Diwali.
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:01, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Send Diwali wishings by adding {{subst:Happy Diwali}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

Talkback

Hello, Onel5969. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Richter.
Message added 17:26, 10 November 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Request to revisit the discussion, per sources presented therein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:26, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 03:56:28, 11 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by LW1588

LW1588 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Kirk Ke Wang (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I took your advice and edited the citations, and resubmitted. However another reviewer replied that the person in my article is not notable, need more citations. I am confused with the amount of citations needed to be notable. I check "notability" guidance and believe that the person has the substantial coverage, and won the national art competition, and is a creative professional, meet the notability criteria. Please help me to resolve the matter. Thank you.!LW1588 (talk) 03:56, 11 November 2015 (UTC)LW1588 (talk) 03:56, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LW1588 - I know (believe me, I know) that it can be confusing when you first start editing. It does get easier. The biggest issue is the formatting of the citations. I've formatted the first one, to give you an example of how to properly format them. The link SwisterTwister and I both gave you, WP:CIT, gives examples of other types of citations (e.g. books, newspapers, etc). If there is an author, you should definitely include them, same with a page number, and a date of publication. If you found it on the web, you should definitely include the web link, for ease of verification.

There are two basic types of citations, those that verify a fact in the article (the first citation which I formatted is an example of that), and those that go to determine notability. The first citation is from an affiliated organization, his employer, so it' invalid for notability purposes, but can definitely be used for verification purposes. Galleries where their work is shown, the artists' own website, commercial sites where they might have their stuff for sale, all are invalid for notability. What is good for notability is in-depth articles from reliable, independent sources about the subject. I hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:11, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clevedon Hall article

Hi there,

I've made some changes but please can you advise what style changes need to be made? Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Clevedon_Hall

Thank you!

Jojourneypr (talk) 09:32, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jojourneypr - Nice job. I see that Timtrent has already moved it to the mainspace. Congrats! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:30, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Phillip Bonosky

Hi Onel5969. You may recall assessing this draft some time ago. I have cleaned the copy vio and ask if you have time to check it and see if the draft is ready for main space. Thanks, -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:23, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diannaa - I've been going through the G13 eligible articles looking for stuff like this the last week, and haven't found any, and then you find one I worked on. Go figure. Yup, I feel it's good to go now. Copyvio check didn't reveal any issues, and that was my only problem with moving it to mainspace back in April. Had a slight formatting issue with section headers (fixed now), but other than that, well-sourced, well-structured, meets notability requirements. Do you want to resubmit and ping me and I'll move it? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:31, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, ready to rock n roll. Thanks a lot, you are awesome. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:34, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

UrbanToronto.ca Draft

Hello Onel5969!

I've updated the Draft:UrbanToronto.ca again and removed a lot of components that could be construed as promotional. Would you mind taking another look at it? Would love your feedback!

Thanks Be McD87 (talk) 17:32, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Be McD87 - The promotional tone is now gone. Nice job. The issue is the notability. Reddit is not a reliable source, and the other 5 are mere mentions, so notability hasn't been established. #2 is a good cite for that fact. And get rid of 3 of the other sources - personally I'd keep the Globe and Mail and the Metro News. But you need at least 3 good in-depth articles about the site from independent sources. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:48, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Marie Serneholt

If you want to, please take a look at this weeks TAFI selected article, Marie Serneholt. Regards.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:48, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent move requests

~~As part of the cleanup, you added: {{db-move|1=Basque American|2=To make room for page move per Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Titles of articles about ethnic groups of the United States}}~~

~~to Basque American~~

so the source and target are the same. While I think I could figure out what you meant, I'm working on handling the other requests, and I will come back to this if you don't reintroduce the corrected template.--S Philbrick (Talk) 22:57, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~===Malaysian Americans=== The template on Malaysian Americans appears to be malformed.~~--S Philbrick (Talk) 23:02, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~===Malian American===~~

~~Malian American, same problem as Basque American--S Philbrick (Talk) 23:04, 11 November 2015 (UTC)~~[reply]

~~===Thai Americans=== The template on Thai Americans appears to be malformed.~~--S Philbrick (Talk) 23:10, 11 November 2015 (UTC) --S Philbrick (Talk) 01:03, 12 November 2015 (UTC)S Philbrick (Talk) 23:12, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Egyptian Americans

The template on Egyptian Americans appears to be malformed.--S Philbrick (Talk) 23:14, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sphilbrick - Thanks for your patience. Shocked you just didn't hit me with 5 trout. I was doing so many to get them out of the way, I think I've fixed the issues. Sorry to dump all those on you guys. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No fish today :) Almost there, can you check Egyptian Americans and Estonian Americans?--S Philbrick (Talk) 01:05, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In Estonian, I think "|1=Estonian Americans" should be "|1=Estonian American"?--S Philbrick (Talk) 01:07, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In Egyptian Americans, you are missing a parameter.--S Philbrick (Talk) 01:08, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, fixed those two as well. Again, thanks for your patience. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:33, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

regarding a prod deprod

Re: [1]. Removed prods should not be restored BUT "This excludes removals that are clearly not an objection to deletion, such as page blanking, mass removals or obvious vandalism; additionally, tags removed by banned users may also be restored." In this case, there's a consensus on anon's talk page that his was WP:POINT anti-prod vandalism; he has used more than one IP address for that - it's clear this is not AGF deprodding, but someone disrupting the project. Through in this case I agree AfD should be a way to go, but not because of the prod issue, but because of WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. PS. I did restore it at [2] per the rationale cited; I'll be reviewing other related cases and seeing where the prod should be restored. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:06, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Piotrus - Thanks for the information. I had simply been under the assumption that you could never re-attach a prod tag, even if its removal in bad faith. But the bad faith exception makes perfect sense. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:06, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maralou Gray

Hello!

I received feedback for my article on Maralou Gray (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Maralou_Gray) from SwisterTwister, who had pinged you on my draft as an interested colleague. I was hoping to get some more clarification in order for the article to be accepted, and hoping you can help me!

A lot of the references we have for Maralou's information are in articles published back in the 1940s-1960s, which of course aren't readily available online but we do have the hard copy clippings. Is that not adequate enough for Wikipedia? If these articles were scanned and uploaded, would that work?

If this isn't an option, would it help if I edited and shortened the article down so that just the information that can be referenced is written? There are several online articles from the Los Angeles Times dating back to the 1980s where she is mentioned and quoted, and that is a verifiable source.

Thank you in advance! BioWriter818 (talk) 06:17, 12 November 2015 (UTC)BioWriter818[reply]

Hi BioWriter818 - There is no requirement that sources be available online. If you do use hard copies, please make sure you include all information: publisher, publication, name of author (if applicable), date of article, page article appeared on, title of article. If it's from a book, include the isbn #. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:06, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Onel5969 Great, thank you for the feedback! So just to clarify, do I just reference the hard copies with all that information you specified or do you require that we scan and upload the articles as files? BioWriter818 (talk) 22:23, 12 November 2015 (UTC)BioWriter818[reply]

Hi again BioWriter818 - Yup, use all that information in the cites. Wouldn't know about uploading the files. I'm pinging three helpful admins to see if they know anything about that: Hey there NeilN, Northamerica1000 and MelanieN - any light to shed on the uploading of source material? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:45, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, do not upload copyrighted source material, please. Just a reference is fine. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:30, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Onel5969 and NeilN - Thank you both very much, appreciate your quick responses! BioWriter818 (talk) 04:25, 13 November 2015 (UTC)BioWriter818[reply]

Roger Williams

Glad you approve - it seemed the best way to help anyone getting confused in the future! I got here today via the Roger Williams (disambiguation) page on my watchlist, where someone made a strange edit trying to disentangle two versions of RW. I've known that imdb doesn't count as a WP:RS, but this is the first time I've seen such, apparent, confusion there. Happy Editing! PamD 12:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No worries PamD - I do a little bit of work on old actor articles, and when I read the bio on imdb I was intrigued, so I started to dig into his history a bit. This is only the second or third case where I remember imdb getting the birth date incorrect. Anyway, thanks for adding the link (and the note!). Take it easy. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:50, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your review for Credible website

Hello Onl5969,

Thank you for your review. I have re-submitted the script such that it lists facts and information about Credible. I am within the Marketing department, and have suggested we create a Wikipedia website because it allows readers to get to know more about out business. As I am in Marketing, using words to illustrate 'success of an organization' is a natural habit. I hope the revisions satisfy your tastes.

Please let me know how to move forward.

My Best, ~Ej Cruz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ejcruz (talk • contribs) 16:17, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ejcruz - It appears you've resubmitted it already. In my opinion it is still highly promotional, but I won't review it, and give another editor a chance to look it over. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:40, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and drink


	Hello, Onel5969. You are invited to join WikiProject Food and drink, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of food, drink and cuisine topics. Please check out the project, and if interested feel free to join by adding your name to the member list. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:58, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed all of the food-related userboxes on your user page, so extending an invitation. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:58, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015 newsletter

	The WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter Volume III, no. 3, September–November 2015
	Note: To opt out from receiving future newsletters, please click here for instructions.

Project News

Potential upcoming project page changes by WikiProject X. Category discussions at CfD. (more below)

— View by clicking [show] —

WikiProject X may begin pilot testing to refine WikiProject Food and Drink's project's pages. A recent discussion regarding this occurred at the project talk page here.

During September–October 2015, several food and drink categories have been discussed at Categories for discussion. Notices for these discussions are sometimes posted at the project's talk page. Notice about a new discussion was recently posted at the project talk page on 8 November 2015.

There are presently 3,658 unassessed Food and drink articles. Assistance in reducing this number would be appreciated.

Please see the project's Tasks and To do sections for project and article tasks, and please update the lists by adding new entries and removing resolved or outdated ones.

Recent Good article nominations are listed below.

04 Nov 2015 – Esparza's (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Another Believer (t · c); see discussion
03 Nov 2015 – Eagle Boys (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Clare. (t · c); see discussion
22 Oct 2015 – Grodziskie (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Neil916 (t · c); see discussion
18 Oct 2015 – Copia (museum) (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Ɱ (t · c); see discussion
18 Oct 2015 – Mrs Beeton's Book of Household Management (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Chiswick Chap (t · c); see discussion
14 Oct 2015 – The Culinary Institute of America (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Ɱ (t · c); see discussion
14 Oct 2015 – The Culinary Institute of America at Greystone (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Ɱ (t · c); see discussion

Article alerts

— View by clicking [show] —

Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink/Article alerts

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Curabitur pretium tincidunt lacus. Nulla gravida orci a odio. Nullam varius, turpis et commodo pharetra, est eros bibendum elit, nec luctus magna felis sollicitudin mauris. Integer in mauris eu nibh euismod gravida. Duis ac tellus et risus vulputate vehicula. Donec lobortis risus a elit. Etiam tempor. Ut ullamcorper, ligula eu tempor congue, eros est euismod turpis, id tincidunt sapien risus a quam. Maecenas fermentum consequat mi. Donec fermentum. Pellentesque malesuada nulla a mi. Duis sapien sem, aliquet nec, commodo eget, consequat quis, neque. Aliquam faucibus, elit ut dictum aliquet, felis nisl adipiscing sapien, sed malesuada diam lacus eget erat. Cras mollis scelerisque nunc. Nullam arcu. Aliquam consequat. Curabitur augue lorem, dapibus quis, laoreet et, pretium ac, nisi. Aenean magna nisl, mollis quis, molestie eu, feugiat in, orci. In hac habitasse platea dictumst.

Fusce convallis, mauris imperdiet gravida bibendum, nisl turpis suscipit mauris, sed placerat ipsum urna sed risus. In convallis tellus a mauris. Curabitur non elit ut libero tristique sodales. Mauris a lacus. Donec mattis semper leo. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Vivamus facilisis diam at odio. Mauris dictum, nisi eget consequat elementum, lacus ligula molestie metus, non feugiat orci magna ac sem. Donec turpis. Donec vitae metus. Morbi tristique neque eu mauris. Quisque gravida ipsum non sapien. Proin turpis lacus, scelerisque vitae, elementum at, lobortis ac, quam. Aliquam dictum eleifend risus. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Etiam sit amet diam. Suspendisse odio. Suspendisse nunc. In semper bibendum libero.

Proin nonummy, lacus eget pulvinar lacinia, pede felis dignissim leo, vitae tristique magna lacus sit amet eros. Nullam ornare. Praesent odio ligula, dapibus sed, tincidunt eget, dictum ac, nibh. Nam quis lacus. Nunc eleifend molestie velit. Morbi lobortis quam eu velit. Donec euismod vestibulum massa. Donec non lectus. Aliquam commodo lacus sit amet nulla. Cras dignissim elit et augue. Nullam non diam. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Aenean vestibulum. Sed lobortis elit quis lectus. Nunc sed lacus at augue bibendum dapibus.

Feel free to welcome the new members who have recently joined the project.

— View by clicking [show] —

Onel5969

Valoem

DangerousJXD

The project currently has 83 active members.

Some recent food and drink new articles and content:

— View by clicking [show] —

Oktoberfest tents (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools)
Cho Sang-woo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools)
Amira Nature Foods (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools)
Category:Drinking establishments on the National Register of Historic Places by state (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)>
Category:Edible fish by habitat (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:Euryhaline edible fish (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:Freshwater edible fish (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Almond production in Afghanistan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools)
Anti-café (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools)
Jāņi cheese (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools)
Diablo sandwich (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools)
Hill Farmstead Brewery (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools)
Hong Kong Food Festival (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools)

Telstar (apple) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools)
Dumelow's Seedling (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools)
Hygrophoropsis mangenotii (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools)
Goat water (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools)
Landsberger Reinette (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools)
Food waste recycling in Hong Kong (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools)
Category:Marine edible fish (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:Fermented dairy products (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:Marine edible molluscs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

More new articles...

Also see versions in the bot-generated list's Revision history for additional articles (e.g. 1 November 2015,
15 October 2015, 1 October 2015, etc.).

Past newsletters

Food and drink articles by quality and importance

There are currently 33,530 articles attributed to the project, including 10,438 stubs.
There are 35 articles at Featured article class, 160 are at Good article class and 2 are at Featured list class.

— View by clicking [show] —

Article statistics

Food and Drink WikiProject
article assessment

Food and drink articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
Quality	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	???	Total
FA		7	15	32			54
FL		2		2			4
FM					146		146
GA	18	31	77	281			407
B	56	232	346	717		87	1,438
C	77	405	1,013	3,595		550	5,640
Start	22	326	1,666	12,086		3,908	18,008
Stub		17	532	9,020		4,927	14,496
List	12	71	115	550	23	276	1,047
Category					8,313		8,313
Disambig					200		200
File					2,846		2,846
Portal					340		340
Project					355		355
Redirect		10	67	576	2,475		3,128
Template					907		907
NA			6	66	1,951		2,023
Other					193		193
Assessed	185	1,101	3,837	26,925	17,749	9,748	59,545
Unassessed				13		1,968	1,981
Total	185	1,101	3,837	26,938	17,749	11,716	61,526
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 204,697			Ω = 5.11

– Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 23:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 16:17:00, 14 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Pianogac

Pianogac (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Olga Jegunova (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I emailed and asked the previous reviewer if I was on the right track in that I have added citations 1 - 4. Can you help by answering that question?

Geoff

Pianogac (talk) 16:17, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 469: / Line 469: @@
 &nbsp;&nbsp;<small>– Sent by [[User:Northamerica1000|Northamerica1000]] using [[Wikipedia:Mass message senders|mass messaging]] on 23:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)</small>
 <!-- Message sent by User:Northamerica1000@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_WikiProject_Food_and_drink/Notifications&oldid=690514012 -->
+== Request on 16:17:00, 14 November 2015 for assistance on [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|AfC]] submission by Pianogac ==
+{{anchor|16:17:00, 14 November 2015 review of submission by Pianogac}}
+{{Lafc|username=Pianogac|ts=16:17:00, 14 November 2015|declinedtalk=Draft:Olga_Jegunova}}
+<!-- Start of message -->
+I emailed and asked the previous reviewer if I was on the right track in that I have added citations 1 - 4. Can you help by answering that question?
+Geoff
+<!-- End of message -->[[User:Pianogac|Pianogac]] ([[User talk:Pianogac|talk]]) 16:17, 14 November 2015 (UTC)