Jump to content

User talk:Bellerophon: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Bellerophon/Archive 15) (bot
Line 10: Line 10:
}}
}}
<!--**************LEAVE NEW MESSAGES AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE! DON'T FORGET TO SIGN YOUR MESSAGE WITH FOUR TILDES (~~~~)**************-->
<!--**************LEAVE NEW MESSAGES AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE! DON'T FORGET TO SIGN YOUR MESSAGE WITH FOUR TILDES (~~~~)**************-->

== Xsyon Page Features Section Cleaned Up ==

Hello,

I am contacting you regarding the wikipedia page for the online game Xsyon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xsyon

The page is tagged with a 'neutrality dispute' with the following comment: Features section needs rewriting from a more neutral point of view. Pol430 talk to me 18:41, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

I've removed a few words that could possibly be considered non 'neutral' from the Features section of this page. Would you please check this page and let me know if anything should be further revised and if everything looks ok, could you remove the 'dispute' tag?

Thank you very much.

[[User:Stormbusta|Stormbusta]] ([[User talk:Stormbusta|talk]]) 02:38, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Stormbusta

== Question ==

Hello Bellerphon,
My stub-class article about George Heron Milne is my only contribution to wikipedia so far. You made a comment about it. Thank You.
I earnestly request your opinion about the general topic of "notability."

1) Should we preserve notables of the past, even if the articles are shorter than today? For example, an article about the first White House columnist, William Wallace Price, is also not yet a full article. He is surely notable. But the information age gives us so much more information about current "notables."
Persons from 100 years ago seem to have made less of a mark, as measured by how much they are talked about and written about, now that everyone's a writer.

2) There are not likely to be full articles about the following persons, because people didn't used to talk as much as they do now.
* John Pearson, who built the first fulling mill in North America;
* Robert Payne, foreman of the jury at the Salem Witch Trials (after Jan. 1, 1693 -- not sure who was foreman before that date);
* Theodore Pearson of Newburyport, Mass., who started the first cracker factory in 1792, leading eventually to Nabisco...
***and the point of this***
I can write stub-class articles about these and other ancestors, but going farther will be a hit-or-miss proposition.
Is there something about the culture of New England in that era, that makes it hard to figure out more about who those people were? Their family trees are among the most exact and complete of any group so large. So where is their history? *** That's a idea for an article, I guess, and when I talk to some of my relatives, I suspect the missing factor is something about the culture.

3) It's amazing how many of the categories of "notables" for BIOGRAPHY are only in the communication fields. We communicators love to talk about each other, the most! Only a few builders will be found in the "engineer" category.
Dear Bellerophon, I believe You are busy and important and I just hope that You will send me back a reply with something good to consider, and/or give me some feedback about how to have this conversation with our friends of Wikipedia. In regard to the article about George Heron Milne: I had fun writing it and have told the truth 100% from the references listed. I can still put up a good photo about him and add a few more personal things about him from family memories... in light of my question above, would the article still be too short? Would it be good to explain how the great amount of information about him was abbreviated by circumstance? <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:ACareful|ACareful]] ([[User talk:ACareful|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ACareful|contribs]]) 19:04, 15 March 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Question ==
== Question ==

Revision as of 03:28, 17 November 2015

Template:NoBracketBot

User page

Go to my user page
Go to my user page

Talk

Click here to goto my talk page, where you can leave a message for me.
Click here to goto my talk page, where you can leave a message for me.

Email

Please do not email me for routine matters! Only email me for matters you do not wish to discuss on-Wiki.
Please do not email me for routine matters! Only email me for matters you do not wish to discuss on-Wiki.

Adoption

Check out my adoption school
Check out my adoption school

Awards

My awards and recognitions
My awards and recognitions

Contribs

Click here to see my contributions to Wikipedia
Click here to see my contributions to Wikipedia
SEMI-RETIRED
This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

Messages on this talk page are archived after 1 month by a bot.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15

Question

hello sir/madam I have updated the following pages notibility and referencing by major standards and hope you can review it please. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kezia_Noble

Kind Regards

Jayesh Patel 31/03/2015 at 21:27 (uk time)

Question

Is Peyton Manning Gay Or Nah? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.207.222.136 (talk) 18:58, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tashi Air Logo.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Tashi Air Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:01, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bellerophon/Sandbox/WikiProject user warnings, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bellerophon/Sandbox/WikiProject user warnings and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Bellerophon/Sandbox/WikiProject user warnings during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:14, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

JSTOR cleanup drive

Hello TWL users! We hope JSTOR has been a useful resource for your work. We're organizing a cleanup drive to correct dead links to JSTOR articles – these require JSTOR access and cannot easily be corrected by bot. We'd love for you to jump in and help out!



Sent of behalf of Nikkimaria for The Wikipedia Library's JSTOR using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]