Jump to content

User talk:K6ka: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 276: Line 276:
<!-- Message sent by User:Johan (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Tech_ambassadors&oldid=14554655 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Johan (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Tech_ambassadors&oldid=14554655 -->


'''IP Edits'''
==Edits==


Hello, I would like to apologize for the edits on "Casa de los Azulejos: Difference between revisions"
Hello, I would like to apologize for the edits on "Casa de los Azulejos: Difference between revisions"

Revision as of 16:24, 17 November 2015



If You're Bored

User:Epicgenius/Recent Change

Vandalism information

This is K6ka's Wikipedia user talk page where you can leave messages for K6ka.

This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:K6ka.

Click here to start a new discussion at the bottom of this page. Please sign and date your post using four tildes (~~~~).


The Signpost: 04 November 2015

This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2015)

Marie Serneholt at the 48th Guldbagge Awards.
Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Marie Serneholt

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Allegra Versace • Comedy horror


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions[reply]

Wiki Welcome

Thanks for the welcome!

Rufus RenoRufus (talk) 05:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)--RenoRufus (talk) 05:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the welcome!

Thanks for the welcome... I'm mostly using wiki for politics, in the UK and elsewhere. Some great content on here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhont (talkcontribs) 12:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TAFI talk

  • Hello K6ka:
You are invited to participate in this discussion at the TAFI talk page regarding improving the automation of project processes and management of the project. Your input is appreciated.
Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 15:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

17:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Mistake

I don't know where the source came from but that was not a mistake

Wigintonn (talk) 17:50, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Erwin

Hi,

My edit on Lee Erwin (footballer) was genuine and it has been removed.

Thanks.

Aeph24195 (talk) 17:50, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You made a mistake

"If you think I made a mistake...." Yep. You did. I am cleaning up the Sussex Vampire entry, moving the Firesign Theater comment to the Giant Rat of Sumatra page and putting a "Further" template on that section. I edit as an IP address by choice and have been an editor here for more than 9 years. No offense intended by you, i am sure, and none taken by me. I will continue the work i was doing, and trust you to understand it was not vandalism, even though it resulted in a net loss of 200 characters on the page. Thanks. catherine yronwode, not logged in 75.101.104.17 (talk) 18:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I must've misread your changes! Do accept my humble apologies -- it was nothing against you or IP editors. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 19:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No apology necessary! I actually undertook this as part of the revision of the Giant Rat of Sumatra page, due to the discovery of seven new species of giant rats... Please see that page and proofread it, if you would be so kind, Thank you. Sincerely, catherine yronwode, not logged in 75.101.104.17 (talk) 19:52, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Autoblock appeal

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
K6ka (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "History of Persia". The reason given for History of Persia's block is: "Copyright violations".


Accept reason: Trusted user. This my my first clearing of an autoblock so please let me know if I messed something up. NeilN talk to me 19:20, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help

I have already requested a new username here but it's been 2 days and I haven't received a response and my entry appears in neither rejected nor completed requests. What is happening. Where do the 'being processed' requests go? Help me out. --IzWeirdTho (talk) 14:37, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@IzWeirdTho: It appears your request has been rejected for being too similar to an existing username. You should've received an email informing you about the request being declined. You may file another request if you wish. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 15:07, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

Really, I think you would make a good RfA candidate. I noticed sometime ago that you were a global renamer, so when you left a message on my talk page today (thank you for that, by the way!), I remembered that and thought a person with such a right might be a good candidate for RfA. As you might know, I'm very active in RfA reform and I started the now massive Phase I RfC for RFA2015. I firmly believe that we need more admins, and I did not change my mind at all just because I managed to pass RfA. (There's a good plenty of candidates just as good or even better that didn't pass; it really all depends on who shows up.) Back to the point, I looked into your contributions a bit more, and I was rather impressed with what I saw. Your CSD log looks very good, and the statistics on your participation at AfD seems to show that although you know the policies, you do also think for yourself (e.g., you don't always choose easy AfDs and pile on with the "winning side" just to improve your stats). That's a good trait in an administrator. You also seem to be very active in anti-vandalism. You have about two years of experience and around 15,500 non-automated edits. Obviously, the trust that comes with the global renamer tool would also work in your favor. Your weak point seems to be content creation, though. You would definitely get some opposition for that, but I think there's a considerable chance that your other work would outweigh that in the eyes of the voters. Let me know if you would like me to nom, but you could also ask someone else. I really just wanted you to consider the possibility of running. It would be my first nomination, and in any case I'm not in good repute amongst the anti-RfA-reform crowd (they showed up at my RfA, and not in the support section), so there might be some degree of guilt by association. (The nominator really does matter, you know.) --Biblioworm 00:05, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Biblioworm: Thank you for your comments! You're definitely not the first person who has suggested that I run for RFA and offered to nominate me. You are correct in the fact that content creation is a bit lacking, but I do personally think that opposing a candidate solely for lack of content creation even when everything else is fine is absurd.
I am, however, a bit confused at your point about my participation at AFD. "I participate in AFD?" Well, I do, but very rarely, and definitely not enough to stop someone from opposing me for it. Granted, I don't have much interest in working in AFD, so if I got the mop, I won't be seen there very often, if at all.
I've received advice and/or offers from other users about me running for RFA. They're at User_talk:K6ka/Archive_8#Why_aren.27t_you_an_administrator.3F, User_talk:K6ka/Archive_9#Adminship, User_talk:K6ka/Archive_10#Administrator, and User_talk:K6ka/Archive_12#Adminship. I've also received some advice over IRC. My response to every one of them had something to do with RFA being "mean and tough". I am happy to see that there are Wikipedians out there that do realize the need for new administrators and the need to change RFA, which Jimbo describes as being a broken process. While I can't really decide which option is best, I do agree on one thing: RFA needs to be changed. Dramatically. And maybe our mindset on what sysops do as well.
I may consider a nomination sooner or later (Although, I'm not one to make promises!). I'll definitely contact you if I decide to run, and I can certainly ask you for advice (especially considering you've been through the pepper spray and tomatoes, and you're still in one piece). I may or may not pass my first RFA, but I know that, even if I fail, there will always be some Wikipedians out there that will keep me from being discouraged.
Good luck at RFA2015! (It sounds like some sort of international event, doesn't it?) --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 00:48, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for the info! KyronR (talk) 23:04, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article

Hello, i did an interview with Bob on my radio show and he told me there. I will post the interview to my web page in a day or two and i will include it as a reference.

Thank you.

I have a question, I'm a journalist and I have alot of Canadian Knowledge. Maybe you could help me create a page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.202.58.135 (talk) 18:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spontaneous Combustion

The source was Richard Mitchell himself, my uncle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.107.177.147 (talk) 19:18, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 November 2015

This week's article for improvement (week 47, 2015)

A continuum of goods and services
Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Goods and services

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Marie Serneholt • Allegra Versace


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:16, 16 November 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions[reply]

Give me a reason

I've read the article about the notability, now. Can you give me a reason why do you keep putting a speedy deletion notice for an article i spent a long time building... this is all i get? I just don't understand what you're doing... can you make me understand? explain? AfrcnBeauty23 (talk) 18:02, 16 November 2015 (UTC)afrcnBeauty23[reply]

@AfrcnBeauty23: You're not allowed to remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. Also, creating alternate accounts to keep removing those tags is definitely not acceptable, and neither is going to someone else's article to slap CSD tags on them in an act of vengeance. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 18:05, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a thing, I didn't ask you to tell me what am I not allowed to do, or what am I doing to commit vengeance on someone... I'm asking you to give me a reason why do you keep putting a notice on my article, this isn't personal, it's business. I've read the notability article. and as far as I know, I've reached the line... so why are you doing that? what are your reasons? this isn't about you or me.. it's about my article. Maybe just review it again, I'm not forcing you to remove the notice, I'm just asking for a reason so that I would know what to do, and no. this is not an alternate account, just so you know... AfrcnBeauty23 (talk) 18:16, 16 November 2015 (UTC)AfrcnBeauty23[reply]

@AfrcnBeauty23: Because it genuinely is not notable. When I Google the subject, I can only find links to social media websites. Anyone can simply create an account on any of those websites to get their identity on the web. That doesn't make them notable for inclusion on Wikipedia. We need some reliable sources to prove that the subject 1) Exists, and 2) Is worth including on Wikipedia. If you want to keep your work, you may find the Drafts namespace to be of benefit. Also, my previous reasoning for re-adding the tag was justified. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 18:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay then... problem solved right? I knew I should have done this article somewhere else, but thanks, I hade a cool experience here in wiki, as a writer, it improved me... I knew better things, and I knew how to be less childish, speaking of being childish, I'm sorry I slapped a CSD tag on someone else's article just to commit vengeance, I mean it. Okay, I better get going now, my experience here today in wiki as an article writer changed how I see this website, everybody must have been working hard here... thanks again, nice meeting you.. AfrcnBeauty23 (talk) 18:30, 16 November 2015 (UTC)AfrcnBeauty24[reply]

19:39, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Edits

Hello, I would like to apologize for the edits on "Casa de los Azulejos: Difference between revisions"

This is a shared IP at a public school so there are many people here.

64.30.37.124 (talk) 16:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]