User talk:Arbeit10: Difference between revisions
→ArbCom elections are now open!: new section |
|||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
::Didn't watch Juan Martin's article. Anyway, thanks. [[User:Arbeit10|Arbeit10]] ([[User talk:Arbeit10#top|talk]]) 20:17, 16 December 2014 (UTC) |
::Didn't watch Juan Martin's article. Anyway, thanks. [[User:Arbeit10|Arbeit10]] ([[User talk:Arbeit10#top|talk]]) 20:17, 16 December 2014 (UTC) |
||
== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] == |
|||
Hi,<br> |
|||
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current [[WP:ACE2015|Arbitration Committee election]]. The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia [[WP:RFAR|arbitration process]]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[WP:ARBPOL|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to [[WP:ACE2015/C|review the candidates' statements]] and submit your choices on [[Special:SecurePoll/vote/398|the voting page]]. For the Election committee, [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692268845 --> |
Revision as of 17:06, 24 November 2015
March 2014
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2014 Sony Ericsson Open, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Please indicate in your edit summary which article is being repeated. KJ click here 00:08, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Francesca Schiavone, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Francesca Schiavone was changed by Arbeit10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958117 on 2014-03-17T13:59:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:59, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Tournament names
I noticed a revert by you on a couple tennis articles today. You have a point on the WTA Tour Championships since it is the title of the heading, but you can't just link the city. It should be unlinked or per guidelines I think it should have the actual tournament name. In the other tables we must have the non-sponsored tournament name directly linked. Also we do not put number 1's for the first tournament victory, we start with number 2. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:04, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Wozniacki
12 tournaments (by surfaces) are missing from the total sum by surfaces in "Career Statistic" subsection of the table, but I don't know on which surfaces she played which tournament out of those 12. So, total is OK, but in totals by surfaces something is missing. It seems that, in the past few months, whoever was updating the article, he didn't update every single number regularly and so there are discrepancies here. I edit this (part of) article on BS Wiki using the data from EN Wiki and I noticed this issue by purely calculating numbers. And I saw that you were last who edited the article here, so I decided to inform you. -- KWiki (talk) 16:18, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for informing. I'll try to pay attention on it. Arbeit10 (talk) 10:06, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
Your recent editing history at 2014_Wimbledon_Championships_–_Men's_Singles shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Amortias (T)(C) 18:52, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Consistency on final brackets
Hi, ArbeitTen. I saw you have undone my changes on tennis final brackets. A solution may be i.e. covering the Grand Slam singles events with the final brackets beginning with the 4th rounds. But, is there any policy about the matter?
--Ernestogon (talk) 23:24, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Del Potro or del Potro
In the main article it's del Potro but in the Federer article you want to change it to Del Potro. Per this ATP article it's del Potro and also this ATP article. Also this magazine and the Washington Post. And per the Chicago Manual of Style "English Names with Particles" and also for Non-English Names, under which is the subheading "Italian, Portugese, German, and Dutch Names". Under that, we read:
- "Particles . . . are lower-cased and are usually dropped when the surname is used alone"
another English grammar source tells us the correct sentences are
- The de Gennarros are coming to dinner this evening.
- An often-encountered Italian surname is "de Gennarro." Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:53, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Didn't watch Juan Martin's article. Anyway, thanks. Arbeit10 (talk) 20:17, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)