User talk:Kim Bruning: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Kim Bruning/Archive 9) (bot |
→ArbCom elections are now open!: new section |
||
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Rich_Farmbrough#Final_decision Here]. |
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Rich_Farmbrough#Final_decision Here]. |
||
All the best: ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]] [[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', <small>20:17, 9 August 2014 (UTC).</small><br /> |
All the best: ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]] [[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', <small>20:17, 9 August 2014 (UTC).</small><br /> |
||
== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] == |
|||
Hi,<br> |
|||
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current [[WP:ACE2015|Arbitration Committee election]]. The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia [[WP:RFAR|arbitration process]]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[WP:ARBPOL|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to [[WP:ACE2015/C|review the candidates' statements]] and submit your choices on [[Special:SecurePoll/vote/398|the voting page]]. For the Election committee, [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=693174033 --> |
Revision as of 22:13, 30 November 2015
- User talk:Kim Bruning/Archive 1
- User talk:Kim Bruning/Archive 2
- User talk:Kim Bruning/Archive 3
- User talk:Kim Bruning/Archive 4
- User talk:Kim Bruning/Archive 5
- User talk:Kim Bruning/Archive 6
- User talk:Kim Bruning/Archive 7
- User talk:Kim Bruning/Archive 8
- User talk:Kim Bruning/Archive 9
- User talk:Kim Bruning/Archive 10
- User talk:Kim Bruning/Archive 11
Hello! Note that I am away. Please append your message at the end of the page, though I can't promise I'll do anything about it atm.
This page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III.
Discussion on Jimbos page
I am awake and waiting for your counterarguments. Prandr 11:09 CEST, 14 May 2007
Super datatool!!!
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Hauptautoren. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eloquence (talk • contribs)
Wikipedia has a second Carlos admin
Governance reform and AGF challenge
Hi! I've been reading through some of your comments on WT:Governance reform. I find hard rules and binding decisions as appealing as the next person, but I also find your arguments very compelling.
Working within a corporate hierarchy, I see first-hand the tension between being bold to get things done, and waiting for the formal decision-making process to complete. When I do employee performance reviews there are usually questions on the form about display of management skills. Non-manager employees almost always skip these questions on the grounds that they simply have zero opportunity to exercise management skills. I tell them that the true test of management skills is exercising influence over others when you don't have a manager title, or when they don't report to you. I guess this corresponds to building consensus.
I followed the link to WP:Lectures, and I'm sorry to find that I missed the session on Fill's AGF challenge. I'm sure that you're really busy, but I'd appreciate any feedback you might have on my answers. Cheers, Bovlb (talk)
Everything blue
This is an example of everything turning blue (just about). Even single letters A B c
Kittey was shrunk =
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
WP:RM
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Link
- Here.
All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 20:17, 9 August 2014 (UTC).
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)