Talk:Ribosome: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:52, 5 December 2015

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ribosome article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Template:Vital article

Ribosome was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 23, 2005	Good article nominee	Listed
January 25, 2006	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

Template:WP1.0 Template:Archive box collapsible

dead link

The first external link seems to be broken. Please remove the following: 70S Ribosome Architecture Animation of a working ribosome. Requires the Chime browser plugin from this site (where registration is required). Iakov Davydov (talk) 08:47, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for spotting this. I have removed the link. Graham Colm (talk) 11:06, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ribosome structure

I suggest to move the whole section on structure to a new page. There is plenty of more information to be incorporated, so this will eventually become unwieldy. Peteruetz (talk) 14:52, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ribosome: structure and function, molecular device/machine

I just found a good review about these aspects of ribosome: ^[1] Kazkaskazkasako (talk) 18:19, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

This non sequitur at the end of the structure section has been deleted for lack of context or explanation and weasel wording.

"It should be noted that the production of the component parts of the ribosome from a messenger RNA molecule is rather strongly isomorphic with the self-replication model of von Neumann."

173.25.54.191 (talk) 22:26, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you. It's also tantamount to gibberish. Graham Beards (talk) 22:53, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

Shouldn't "intercellular" in "Ribosomes are often embedded in the intercellular membranes that make up the rough endoplasmic reticulum" be replaced by "intracellular"? --Seadogburger (talk) 11:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you for pointing this out. Graham Beards (talk) 17:15, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Moore, Peter B. (2012). "How Should We Think About the Ribosome?". Annual Review of Biophysics. 41 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-050511-102314. PMID 22577819. Retrieved 2014-09-19.

[Ribosome_macromolecular_device_2012_REVIEW-1] Moore, Peter B. (2012). "How Should We Think About the Ribosome?". Annual Review of Biophysics. 41 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-050511-102314. PMID 22577819. Retrieved 2014-09-19.

[1]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{GA nominee|19:29, 5 December 2015 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:Ankit2299|Ankit2299]] ([[User talk:Ankit2299|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Biology and medicine|status=|note=}}
 {{Talk header}}
 {{Vital article|level=4|topic=Science|class=B|subpage=Biology}}