User talk:Heather: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by Bomabenjy2 - "" |
Bomabenjy2 (talk | contribs) →Articles for deletion Ken Giami: new section |
||
Line 337: | Line 337: | ||
Thank you <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bomabenjy2|Bomabenjy2]] ([[User talk:Bomabenjy2|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bomabenjy2|contribs]]) 15:35, 16 December 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Thank you <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bomabenjy2|Bomabenjy2]] ([[User talk:Bomabenjy2|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bomabenjy2|contribs]]) 15:35, 16 December 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== Articles for deletion Ken Giami == |
|||
Hello Heather I saw your profile on the list of wikipedians. It says you are interested in Nigeria. I started an article on Ken Giami and it has been nominated for deletion on grounds of notability ... Ken Giami From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia <ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Giami</ref> |
|||
The notability criteria clearly states as I read, that People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published[4] secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,[5] and independent of the subject.[6]<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_%28people%29</ref> |
|||
I have provided sources of reference that fulfill the above criteria for notability. |
|||
The guidelines also states that If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability.[7]<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_%28people%29</ref> |
|||
I have also provided multiple independent sources and the page has been edited by other users with references added. |
|||
I would like to know the next step for getting the article off the deletion nomination list. There is a talk page on the article <ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ken_Giami</ref> |
|||
Please I need your guidance on moving to the next stage of getting the article listed |
|||
Thank you |
Revision as of 15:37, 16 December 2015
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Welcome to the Wikipedia!
Hello, and Welcome to the Wikipedia, Heather! Thanks for signing in over on the Africa-related regional notice board. Hope you enjoy editing here and becoming a Wikipedian! Here are a few perfunctory tips to hasten your acculturation into the Wikipedia experience:
- Take a look at the Wikipedia Tutorial and Manual of Style.
- When you have time, you can peruse The five pillars of Wikipedia, and assume good faith, but keep in mind the unique style you brought to the Wiki!
- Always be mindful of striving for NPOV, be respectful of others' POV, and remember your perspective on the meaning of neutrality is invaluable!
- If you need any help, post your question at the Help Desk.
- Explore, be bold in editing, and, above all else, have fun!
And some odds and ends: Boilerplate text, Brilliant prose, Cite your sources, Civility, Conflict resolution, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Pages needing attention, Peer review, Policy Library, Utilities, Verifiability, Village pump, and Wikiquette; also, you can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes: ~~~~.
Best of luck, Heather, and most importantly, have fun! Ombudsman 00:03, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
New votes on Jewish articles
Hi Heather: The votes that were cast about the recent Jewish articles were stopped and relisted for a new ("2nd") vote, all can now be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewish summer camps and local organizations. Best wishes. IZAK 06:58, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Libya
Please feel free to evaluate the Libya article which has become a 'Featured Article Candidate' and write you support or opposition on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates. Hopefully Libya will become only the second African country to be featured on Wikipedia. Thanks --User:Jaw101ie 12:30, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Article for deletion: Gnaa, Nigeria
The article Gnaa, Nigeria has just entered its 3rd AfD. There's been considerable debate in the past as to:
- Does such a place even exist?
- If a place does exist with that name, is it notable?
- Is this all a hoax perpetrated by the other GNAA, the Gay Niggers Association of America; they issue press releases datelined Gnaa, Nigeria.
I understand you have edited Nigerian articles extensively -- if you get the chance, can you maybe take a look and render an opinion pro or con? Thanks, --A. B. 00:47, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
GCotW
You showed support for Gaming Collaboration of the week. This week Wikipedia:Gaming Collaboration of the week/current was selected to be improved to featured article status. Hope you can help. |
Hello! As you're a Wikipedian interested in African topics, I'm writing to notify you that the Maraba Coffee article is now a 'Featured Article Candidate'. Please feel free to evaluate the article and write your support or opposition at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates. Thanks — SteveRwanda 14:59, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Flat Earth
If you want to see when Flat Earth gets nominated for FA again just add Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Flat Earth to your watch list. When you see it get moved to archive1 it has been renominated. Jay32183 00:50, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Good day, Heather. Rather than create a new section on your talk page, I may as well add a inquiry to this section; namely, does a fictional work set on a flat world merit a mention in the Flat Earth article when it really has more to do with a flat world than the flat Earth? Perhaps a separate article should be created, like Fictional writings containing flat worlds or Flat worlds (novels), and an sourced analysis of the worlds' inclusion in the Flat Earth article. What do you think? Do you have any other ideas where it would be a good idea to take an article? Gracenotes T § 04:08, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 02:38, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Nikhil Parekh
I have just placed this notice on the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikhil Parekh page, and am bringing every voter's attention to it as promised.
Comment. Sigh. Despite the inevitable tirade that this will unleash, I am sorry to have to bring new information to the table. I have this morning received an email from Vijaya Ghose, editor of the Limca Book of Records. "Dear Mr (----), We have enlisted a couple of claims of Nikhil Parekh. Longest Poem is not one of them. He has formidable competition in John Milton's Paradise Lost and our own Mahabharata. However, he has written to many heads of state and has received replies but not from the head of state but the secretary or executive assistant. He is is the first from India to feature on Eppie. We checked with them. Regards Vijaya Ghose. So Parekh, though probably not notable as a poet, is indeed an Indian world record holder. I suspect that this changes the balance on his notability, though the article would still require a great deal of clear-up. I will notify everyone who took part in this vote and ask admins to extend debate a little. Sorry.
I don't know whether this changes your vote, but thought you should know. Vizjim 06:04, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Romanticismlifeandtimes
See my note at User talk:Nehwyn#Romanticismlifeandtimes... —Wknight94 (talk) 19:20, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Invitation
Belovedfreak 20:06, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Please use English
I noticed that you have posted comments to the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roma Virtual Network in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. —Psychonaut 17:15, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- Okay. I hadn't been editing in a while and wasn't aware of that guideline. Heather 20:32, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
A note on Speedy G4
Hi ergot. I noticed you had tagged Pownce for speedy deletion as a recreation based on the AfD. However, it did not go through a full deletion nomination; the nomination was aborted when the article was speedy deleted. In this type of case (speedy deletions), CSD G4 does not apply. I encourage you to read fuzheado's explanation of why he undeleted the article. Yours in discourse--ragesoss 01:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Stephen King's inspiration - Deletion Review
Heather,
You weighed in with an opinion on the deletion review for Stephen King's inspiration (Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_July_22) in support of the deletion, citing that the article was a copyright violation. As I have explained in the review, only a portion of the article was a copyright violation, not the full article. I am suggesting that the article be reinstated, the copyright violation sections removed and the work on the article continued. At the very least, the AfD should be re-opened and reevaluated. I asked for the review because the process of the AfD was mishandled, in my opinion, and the article was deleted without consensus. I'm hoping, with this in mind, you might reconsider your vote for Keep Deleted. All the best, LACameraman 07:34, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Heather, thanks for your reply. I do have to argue, however, that the article does not violate WP:NOT at all. It is not an indiscriminate collection of information, but rather an examination of the creative genesis behind the significant works of one of the most popular and prolific literary figures of the 20th century. There is nothing indiscriminate about this article, for which I am lobbying. It is also, certainly, not original research. The significant portion of the article for which I am arguing was all well-cited, well written and in full compliance with Wikipedia policy. There is actually no problem whatsoever in deleting the portions of the article that could be considered copyvio as the entire article was modular. It's a very simple thing to do in editing creating no mess, no fuss. I understand wholly that AfD is not a vote, however, official Wikipedia policy DOES require consensus in discussion for AfD. "Articles listed here are debated for up to five days, after which the deletion process proceeds based on Wikipedia community consensus." [emphasis added] per WP:AFD, in this case, the consensus was clearly for keep or merge, yet it was deleted - hence my bringing the deletion to the review process. As far as merging the non copyvio information into the individual articles on the books, I'm happy to do that if this review result is to keep the article deleted. Thanks for your consideration in this, it is much appreciated. I've been an active Wiki editor for more than a year and have contributed significantly to two featured articles, so I certainly am not going to be turned away by the result of this process - but would like the article to get a fair shake based on it's merits (which according to official policy happens in the AfD NOT the DrV), which didn't really happen. All the best LACameraman 15:19, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Your comment in the DRV seems somewhat odd - you appear to be endorsing a non-existent deletion... David Mestel(Talk) 22:33, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Fair use disputed for Image:Image:Eedris abdulkareem mr lecturer.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Image:Eedris abdulkareem mr lecturer.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:20, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- How can you dispute Fair Use of an image that doesn't exist, and never existed? Buggy bot. Heather 22:37, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks... | ||
Thank you for your participation in my recent RfA. Even though you didn't support my candidacy, I did greatly appreciate your comments, which I will certainly put to good use in improving myself as an editor. I do plan to make another request in a few months, once I have improved upon your concerns. Thank you again, and happy editing! Hersfold (t/a/c) 01:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC) |
Pidgin
Do you know if Pidgin has a different word for "sport/sports" than English, or whether those will suffice? I've been unable to find any Pidgin-English dictionaries with the word in them, and since you commented on Talk:Nigerian Pidgin I suppose you might know. Picaroon (t) 03:56, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, Heather. I have a very minimal understanding of written Pidgin, Igbo and Yoruba, but can't go from English to any of those languages at all. The reason I ask is Gaillimh, an Irish admin, was writing something relating to Nigeria and asked if I knew a term for sports, which I didn't.
- I agree with you about the dearth of reliable sources. I have many musicians on my watchlist, but am unable to try and fix them up because I can't find any reliable sources on the internet. None of the daily newspapers I consider trustworthy cover popular culture much, and I haven't seen any particularly reliable-looking websites via Google, so I mostly stick to history, politics, and geography. Picaroon (t) 02:03, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry is open for discussion!
See above! Your comment was reverts, as I hadn't finished all my questions yet :-) Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 00:31, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
AfDs
Just a reminder that there's no need to advocate "Delete as per my nom" if you nominate an article for deletion. As nominator, you're automatically advocating deletion, and indeed if you aren't then the AfD will often be closed early. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:16, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Efcc logo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Efcc logo.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 12:06, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Afro-juju merge
Re: your comments (a few years ago) on merging Afro-juju into the main juju music article. I think this is the best thing to do- I'll add it to my to-do list for the next week. Glad to see that someone else is interested in Nigerian articles. Rjhatl (talk) 21:16, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- I lived in Nigeria for a few years, and have some good friends there (one of whom works in the music industry). I'll see what they can dig up. I think a book on Nigerian Hip-Hop might be a tall order, but there might be something written up as an article in a musicology journal. I agree about Nigerian political articles being out of date (or missing entirely). My article-writing time has suddenly shrunk quite a bit, but I'd be happy to help find sources, as I have access to online journals through a local university. Rjhatl (talk) 21:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Modal window.png
An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Modal window.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 23:50, 10 March 2009 (UTC) --▫ JohnnyMrNinja 23:50, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (File:Eedris abdulkareem pass.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Eedris abdulkareem pass.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 20:48, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (File:Eedris abdulkareem mr lecturer.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Eedris abdulkareem mr lecturer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 20:49, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (File:Eedris abdulkareem jaga jaga.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Eedris abdulkareem jaga jaga.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 20:49, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (File:Eedris abdulkareem letter to mr president.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Eedris abdulkareem letter to mr president.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 20:49, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use Image:Eedrisabdulkareem.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Eedrisabdulkareem.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 20:51, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Non Free Files in your User Space
Hey there Heather, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User:Heather. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.
- See a log of files removed today here.
- Shut off the bot here.
- Report errors here.
Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 00:23, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Up to assist?
Based on your comment at the AFD for Cristian Oviedo (dance instructor), I've started Cristian Oviedo (soccer player) but do not write about sports figures nor know anything about soccer. Care to advise? Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:49, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
On May 20, 2010, it appears that you inserted the following material into this article:
- 1922: The Down With Shame movement in the Soviet Union holds nude marches and "Evenings of the Denuded Body" intended to dispel earlier, "bourgeois" morality.[1][2]
Footnotes
This information was ported into another piece three days ago and came to my attention today. In attempting to correct the improper footnote above, I pulled the Siegelbaum book from my shelf. I found no reference whatsoever to either the "Down with Shame" movement or nudity or "Evenings of the Denuded Body" in the index of that book, nor did I find any information on these topics in a cursory skim of the relevant section. The fabrication of footnotes is an extremely serious issue, I'm sure you'll agree, as is improperly accusing someone of having done that. I seek complete clarification on this issue. My apologies if I have missed anything, but please provide correct page number citations for this information, either on the talk page of the article in question or via my user talk page. Thank you. Carrite (talk) 23:01, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
- Although I've responded elsewhere, due to the nature of the suggestion I feel compelled to also note here that the citation was entirely legitimate. That the subject did not appear in the book's index does not exclude it from having been mentioned in the book. Heather (talk) 23:45, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Research survey invitation
Greetings Heather-
My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a doctoral student at the University of Oregon, studying digital media and online community. I am posting to invite you to participate in my research study exploring the work of Wikipedia editors who are members of WikiProject: Countering Systemic Bias. The online survey should take 20 to 25 minutes to complete and can be found here:
https://oregon.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_cSHzuwaQovaZ6ss
Your responses will help online communication researchers like me to better understand the collaborations, challenges, and purposeful work of Wikipedia editors like you. In addition, at the end of the survey you will have the opportunity to express your interest in a follow-up online interview with the researcher.
This research project has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Research Committee as well as the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon. For a detailed description of the project, please visit its Meta page. This survey is voluntary, and your confidentiality will be protected. You will have the choice of using your Wikipedia User Name during the research or creating a unique pseudonym. You may skip any question you choose, and you may withdraw at any time. By completing the survey, you are providing consent to participate in the research.
If you have any questions about the study, please contact me via my Talk Page (UOJComm) or via email. My faculty advisor is Dr. Ryan Light. If you have any questions regarding your rights as a research participant, please contact the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon.
Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
Randall Livingstone School of Journalism & Communication University of Oregon UOJComm (talk) 03:54, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi Heather, I saw your edit in article about the legality of cannabis in the country Ecuador. I read the ley108ec.pdf file (second reference) and it says in Art. 36 and 37 that is is illegal. Could you provide a ref to verify your change? Greetings. --190.154.123.90 (talk) 19:03, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
- Sure! Check out the US State Department document that's also linked as a ref. I think the confusion lies in the fact that there have been several different versions of Ley 108 over the years; the version linked in the article is one that I don't believe to be current. Heather (talk) 23:20, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, you are right about that pdf, Information for American Citizens from the US Embassy. But in this web site, Drug Law Reform in Latin America - Ecuador it states that the decriminalization is still pending. I don't know which information is wrong or not. We have now contradictions. --190.154.123.90 (talk) 18:09, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Nekkids
Thanks for the clarification. Carrite (talk) 02:00, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Categories
Hi Heather. I saw this edit history, and your comment re categories. If I understand categories correctly, one should add only that (sub-/)category which is at the most appropriate level, rather than 2 levels of the same category tree.
For instance, [1] shows that 'traditional board games' is a sub-category of 'board games', so an article in traditional board games should not be explicitly listed in the category of board games - it picks up the higher-level category automatically.
I think Wikipedia:Category#Categorizing_pages may summarise this better than my example?
Regards, Trafford09 (talk) 00:09, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello there, dear Heather. Regarding your request at ru:wiki, I can recommend you Leonid Skryagin's "Sovetskaya Neft" To The Resque (link) or A Fatal Raid of "Tuapse" published by Trud in 2001 (link). There was a Soviet 1941 comedy "Derbent" Oil Tanker (link). It's a little bit unusual question of yours, because Soviet merchant fleet sailors did not left a lot of written memories. There would be more books and short stories by Soviet Navy veterans or polar icebreakers. Anyway, if you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Yours, sincerelly. — George Serdechny (talk) 14:31, 26 June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.75.44.49 (talk)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Efcc logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Efcc logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!
World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you! | |
---|---|
Hi Heather! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 17:38, 23 May 2013 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Articles for deletion Ken Giami
Hello Heather I saw your profile on the list of wikipedians. It says you are interested in Nigeria. I started an article on Ken Giami and it has been nominated for deletion on grounds of notability ... Ken Giami From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [1]
The notability criteria clearly states as I read, that People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published[4] secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,[5] and independent of the subject.[6][2]
I have provided sources of reference that fulfill the above criteria for notability.
The guidelines also states that If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability.[7][3]
I have also provided multiple independent sources and the page has been edited by other users with references added.
I would like to know the next step for getting the article off the deletion nomination list. There is a talk page on the article [4]
Please I need your guidance on moving to the next stage of getting the article listed
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bomabenjy2 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Articles for deletion Ken Giami
Hello Heather I saw your profile on the list of wikipedians. It says you are interested in Nigeria. I started an article on Ken Giami and it has been nominated for deletion on grounds of notability ... Ken Giami From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [5]
The notability criteria clearly states as I read, that People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published[4] secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,[5] and independent of the subject.[6][6]
I have provided sources of reference that fulfill the above criteria for notability.
The guidelines also states that If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability.[7][7]
I have also provided multiple independent sources and the page has been edited by other users with references added.
I would like to know the next step for getting the article off the deletion nomination list. There is a talk page on the article [8]
Please I need your guidance on moving to the next stage of getting the article listed
Thank you
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Giami
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_%28people%29
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_%28people%29
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ken_Giami
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Giami
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_%28people%29
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_%28people%29
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ken_Giami