Talk:Zhima Credit: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:51, 26 December 2015

China Unassessed

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

some sources that might be useful

See here and Here

InsertCleverPhraseHere ^{InsertTalkHere} 02:56, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Insertcleverphrasehere: From an edit comment made by another editor: The BBC article clearly states that while a state-sponsored system similar in some ways to Sesame Credit will be mandatory in 2020, that such a system does not yet exist and is not Sesame Credit or affiliated with such. (The BBC article in question is this one.) That's my reading of the situation as well. There's certainly room for writing an article with a title like Proposed Chinese universal citizen rating system, but this isn't it. -- The Anome (talk) 12:58, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

More confusion with citizen rating system

I've removed more material based on this ACLU comment article that conflated this with the proposed citizen rating system. Note the correction by the article's author at the bottom of that page. The proposed citizen rating system is well worth reporting on, but there's no evidence that it's anything to do with Sesame Credit.

As far as I can see, this FT story is the nearest we have to an authoritative source on the proposed Social Credit System. This, and other sources, quote a document entitled "Planning Outline for the Construction of a Social Credit System (2014-2020)", supposedly "State Council Notice concerning Issuance of the Planning Outline for the Construction of a Social Credit System (2014-2020) GF No. (2014)21", but the only online source for is a Wordpress blog post, which does not count as a WP:RS. -- The Anome (talk) 13:46, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 13:46, 26 December 2015 edit The Anome (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Administrators 253,382 edits As far as I can see, [http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/2015/11/16/chinas-social-credit-score-system-is-doomed-to-fail/ this FT story] is the nearest we have to an authoritative source on the proposed Social Credit System. -- ~~~~ ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:51, 26 December 2015 edit undo The Anome (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Administrators 253,382 edits This, and other sources, quote a document entitled "Planning Outline for the Construction of a Social Credit System (2014-2020)", supposedly "State Council Notice concerning Issuance of the Planning Outline for the Construction of a Social Credit System ( Next edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:
	I've removed more material based on [https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-future/chinas-nightmarish-citizen-scores-are-warning-americans this ACLU comment article] that conflated this with the proposed citizen rating system. Note the correction by the article's author at the bottom of that page. The proposed citizen rating system is well worth reporting on, but there's no evidence that it's anything to do with Sesame Credit.		I've removed more material based on [https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-future/chinas-nightmarish-citizen-scores-are-warning-americans this ACLU comment article] that conflated this with the proposed citizen rating system. Note the correction by the article's author at the bottom of that page. The proposed citizen rating system is well worth reporting on, but there's no evidence that it's anything to do with Sesame Credit.

	As far as I can see, [http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/2015/11/16/chinas-social-credit-score-system-is-doomed-to-fail/ this FT story] is the nearest we have to an authoritative source on the proposed [[Social Credit System]]. -- [[User:The Anome\|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome\|talk]]) 13:46, 26 December 2015 (UTC)		As far as I can see, [http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/2015/11/16/chinas-social-credit-score-system-is-doomed-to-fail/ this FT story] is the nearest we have to an authoritative source on the proposed [[Social Credit System]]. This, and other sources, quote a document entitled "Planning Outline for the Construction of a Social Credit System (2014-2020)", supposedly "State Council Notice concerning Issuance of the Planning Outline for the Construction of a Social Credit System (2014-2020) GF No. (2014)21", but the only online source for is a Wordpress blog post, which does not count as a [[WP:RS]]. -- [[User:The Anome\|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome\|talk]]) 13:46, 26 December 2015 (UTC)