Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreuz Duisburg: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
keep |
expand |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*'''Delete''' Just another cloverleaf. Fails GNG. These are utterly generic, cookie cutter features of modern highways worldwide. [[User:Cullen328|<b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328</sup>]] [[User talk:Cullen328|<span style="color:#00F">''Let's discuss it''</span>]] 17:30, 24 December 2015 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' Just another cloverleaf. Fails GNG. These are utterly generic, cookie cutter features of modern highways worldwide. [[User:Cullen328|<b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328</sup>]] [[User talk:Cullen328|<span style="color:#00F">''Let's discuss it''</span>]] 17:30, 24 December 2015 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''—per the emerging consensus that these sorts of articles do not meet GNG and do not warrant coverage. <span style="background:#006B54; padding:2px;">'''[[User:Imzadi1979|<font color="white">Imzadi 1979</font>]] [[User talk:Imzadi1979|<font color="white"><big>→</big></font>]]'''</span> 19:00, 24 December 2015 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''—per the emerging consensus that these sorts of articles do not meet GNG and do not warrant coverage. <span style="background:#006B54; padding:2px;">'''[[User:Imzadi1979|<font color="white">Imzadi 1979</font>]] [[User talk:Imzadi1979|<font color="white"><big>→</big></font>]]'''</span> 19:00, 24 December 2015 (UTC) |
||
**'''Keep:''' There is no such consensus. See [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreuz Chemnitz]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreuz Kaiserberg]]. Also, I have expanded the article since this nomination was created. [[User:Bahnfrend|Bahnfrend]] ([[User talk:Bahnfrend|talk]]) 23:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC) |
**'''Keep:''' There is no such consensus. See [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreieck Ahlhorner Heide]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreuz Chemnitz]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreuz Kaiserberg]]. Also, I have expanded the subject article since this nomination was created. [[User:Bahnfrend|Bahnfrend]] ([[User talk:Bahnfrend|talk]]) 23:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 23:54, 28 December 2015
- Kreuz Duisburg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Was de-prodded with a lengthy rationale. However, the rationale never successfully addresses the point that this particular interchange passes WP:GNG. Just another interchange like thousands of others. Onel5969 TT me 14:36, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Just another cloverleaf. Fails GNG. These are utterly generic, cookie cutter features of modern highways worldwide. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 17:30, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete—per the emerging consensus that these sorts of articles do not meet GNG and do not warrant coverage. Imzadi 1979 → 19:00, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: There is no such consensus. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreieck Ahlhorner Heide, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreuz Chemnitz, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreuz Kaiserberg. Also, I have expanded the subject article since this nomination was created. Bahnfrend (talk) 23:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)