User talk:TheJack15

Re: Every Soul Is a Circus Article

Hi TheJack15 Thanks for reviewing my recent submission. I'm not clear what content is disputed and which references are incorrect. Please advise. Thanks again Feralpearl (talk) 21:55, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

The references are all they same, so it is not necessary to put multiple reference of the same source in the article. TheJack15 (talk) 21:58, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Help needed at DRN

You are receiving this message because you are signed up as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. We have a number of pending requests which need a volunteer to address them. Unless you are an inexperienced volunteer who is currently just watching DRN to learn our processes, please take a case. If you do not see yourself taking cases in the foreseeable future, please remove yourself from the volunteer list so that we can have a better idea of the size of our pool of volunteers; if you do see yourself taking cases, please watchlist the DRN page and keep an eye out to see if there are cases which are ready for a volunteer. We have recently had to refuse a number of cases because they were listed for days with no volunteer willing to take them, despite there being almost 150 volunteers listed on the volunteer page. Regards, TransporterMan (talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) This is an informational posting only and I am not watching this page; contact me on my user talk page if you wish to communicate with me about this. via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:AmericanAirlinesAirbusA320.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:AmericanAirlinesAirbusA320.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 21:17, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Edward S. Farrow

I will do that as soon as possible, I have just begun to look through the source material that I am using. -Wjculp

Copyright Violation

Just a reminder TheJack15 that some of your uploads have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. MilborneOne (talk) 23:09, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Ok, sorry for uploading it, I will make sure to double check the copyright status before uploading another image. TheJack15 (talk) 01:08, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Alvin the Almighty. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, FLEEK, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Alvin the Almighty (talk) 08:48, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Move closure

Was there a reason why you closed this move request after it was recently relisted? Did you review the relisting comment? Tiggerjay (talk) 22:56, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Yes, because their was simply a lack of participation. Even though you notified other project pages about the requested move, no one left a comment on the Move Request except for one person. You can relist the request again if you believe the request will reach a consensus, otherwise, I think it's best to keep the page where it is. TheJack15 (talk) 23:31, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Move closure (2)

I believe you should self-revert your closure here, for at least the following reasons:

• Multiple ongoing threads at WT:MOS, WT:CYCLING, etc., have drawn attention to this RM, and commentary was still active on it. You closed it so fast, I could not even respond to concerns raised by one commenter regarding my own comments, all posted within the last half-day.
• Because this RM contests an undiscussed move (that goes against a previous consensus discussion) the automatic default is to revert to the status quo ante name before the dispute arose, in the advent of no consensus, but you did not perform that necessary rename.
• You do not appear to have weighed the merits of the arguments; the support comments are based in WP:POLICY arguments (both regard to policies per se and guidelines), while the first oppose is nothing but a "reword some other page to my satisfaction or else" ultimatum, and the second is a WP:LOCALCONSENSUS argument (in which the claim of a local consensus is not actually supportable to begin with), so neither oppose has much of any weight at all.
• Despite the fact that MoS could be clarified a bit with regard to its dash-related wording (and already had been before your closure [1]), it's actually clear that this case is already addressed by MoS; it's precisely the same as the "Hale–Bopp" example.
• Non-admin closures should not be performed when there's clearly room for doubt.

 — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  23:18, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

There was only 1 person who supported, and 3 people who opposed. It obviously fell in favor of the 3 people that closed. TheJack15 (talk) 23:33, 29 December 2015 (UTC)