Jump to content

User talk:Mdann52: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Mdann52/Archive 27) (bot
Line 60: Line 60:
</div></div> <section end="technews-2016-W02"/> 16:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
</div></div> <section end="technews-2016-W02"/> 16:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Johan (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Tech_ambassadors&oldid=15213553 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Johan (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Tech_ambassadors&oldid=15213553 -->

== Completely False Article [[Frederick Achom]] ==

Hello,

I would like to draw your attention to this wikipedia article [[Frederick Achom]], at first look it looks like a good article, but it hides most of the real information. If you see article's history you will see that it has been under several editing wars. Almost all claims made in the article are supported in the article are made using own links or PR releases. Also the links which seem genuine like [http://www.standard.co.uk/standard-home/londons-1000-most-influential-people-2010-night-owls-6536459.html London's 1000 most influential people 2010: Night Owls][http://www.standard.co.uk/standard-home/londons-1000-most-influential-people-2011-night-owls-6365518.html London's 1000 most influential people 2011: Night Owls] have many things wrong in them- they claim to be 1000 but not more than 6 are present; they have no author. They are off the website but somehow have crept into the website. There are many such cases in this wiki article.

Frederick Achom is using his wiki article to show potential investors how great he is by supplying all false information and duping them of money. He has been previously convicted and jailed which was earlier in the article but now has somehow disappeared. [http://metro.co.uk/2010/10/13/fraudsters-made-2-5m-from-fine-wine-scam-546303/]
[http://www.standard.co.uk/goingout/restaurants/wine-scam-costs-investors-110m-6326500.html]

[http://www.decanter.com/wine-news/bordeaux-fraudster-convicted-37557/]
[http://www.theguardian.com/money/2008/oct/19/scamsandfraud]

I hope you will understand the gravity of the situation and help in rectifying by either getting the page deleted or corrected.

Thank You. [[User:NihartouJason|NihartouJason]] ([[User talk:NihartouJason|talk]]) 04:32, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:32, 14 January 2016

Template:Archive box collapsible

Happy New Year, Mdann52

Happy New Year, Matt!

(Unknown artist, Norway, 1916)

Archiving ARCAs

When you archive a request to the case talk page, please remove it from the ARCA page as well; I've found that cut-and-paste works well for this :-). Have fun and all the best, Miniapolis 18:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Completely False Article Frederick Achom

Hello,

I would like to draw your attention to this wikipedia article Frederick Achom, at first look it looks like a good article, but it hides most of the real information. If you see article's history you will see that it has been under several editing wars. Almost all claims made in the article are supported in the article are made using own links or PR releases. Also the links which seem genuine like London's 1000 most influential people 2010: Night OwlsLondon's 1000 most influential people 2011: Night Owls have many things wrong in them- they claim to be 1000 but not more than 6 are present; they have no author. They are off the website but somehow have crept into the website. There are many such cases in this wiki article.

Frederick Achom is using his wiki article to show potential investors how great he is by supplying all false information and duping them of money. He has been previously convicted and jailed which was earlier in the article but now has somehow disappeared. [13] [14]

[15] [16]

I hope you will understand the gravity of the situation and help in rectifying by either getting the page deleted or corrected.

Thank You. NihartouJason (talk) 04:32, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]