User talk:Matthewedwards: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Matthewedwards/Archives/2016/01) (bot |
→Completely False Article Frederick Achom: new section |
||
Line 401: | Line 401: | ||
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on [[User_talk:SuggestBot|SuggestBot's talk page]]. Regards from [[User:Nettrom|Nettrom]] ([[User talk:Nettrom|talk]]), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- [[User:SuggestBot|SuggestBot]] ([[User talk:SuggestBot|talk]]) 01:23, 12 January 2016 (UTC) |
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on [[User_talk:SuggestBot|SuggestBot's talk page]]. Regards from [[User:Nettrom|Nettrom]] ([[User talk:Nettrom|talk]]), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- [[User:SuggestBot|SuggestBot]] ([[User talk:SuggestBot|talk]]) 01:23, 12 January 2016 (UTC) |
||
== Completely False Article [[Frederick Achom]] == |
|||
Hello, |
|||
I would like to draw your attention to this wikipedia article [[Frederick Achom]], at first look it looks like a good article, but it hides most of the real information. If you see article's history you will see that it has been under several editing wars. Almost all claims made in the article are supported in the article are made using own links or PR releases. Also the links which seem genuine like [http://www.standard.co.uk/standard-home/londons-1000-most-influential-people-2010-night-owls-6536459.html London's 1000 most influential people 2010: Night Owls][http://www.standard.co.uk/standard-home/londons-1000-most-influential-people-2011-night-owls-6365518.html London's 1000 most influential people 2011: Night Owls] have many things wrong in them- they claim to be 1000 but not more than 6 are present; they have no author. They are off the website but somehow have crept into the website. There are many such cases in this wiki article. |
|||
Frederick Achom is using his wiki article to show potential investors how great he is by supplying all false information and duping them of money. He has been previously convicted and jailed which was earlier in the article but now has somehow disappeared. [http://metro.co.uk/2010/10/13/fraudsters-made-2-5m-from-fine-wine-scam-546303/] |
|||
[http://www.standard.co.uk/goingout/restaurants/wine-scam-costs-investors-110m-6326500.html] |
|||
[http://www.decanter.com/wine-news/bordeaux-fraudster-convicted-37557/] |
|||
[http://www.theguardian.com/money/2008/oct/19/scamsandfraud] |
|||
I hope you will understand the gravity of the situation and help in rectifying by either getting the page deleted or corrected. |
|||
Thank You. [[User:NihartouJason|NihartouJason]] ([[User talk:NihartouJason|talk]]) 04:35, 14 January 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:35, 14 January 2016
Home | Talk | Watchlist | Contribs | Sandbox | To do | Images | Userboxes | Awards | Scripts | Subpages | Menu | Archivebox | Signpostbox | |||
messages
Action | Count |
---|---|
Edits | 23918 |
Edits+Deleted | 27338 |
Pages deleted | 2212 |
Pages restored | 97 |
Pages protected | 29 |
Pages unprotected | 8 |
Protections modified | 5 |
Users blocked | 26 |
Users unblocked | 3 |
User rights modified | 3 |
Users created | 53 |
- In order to Keep discussions centralized, and unless you request otherwise, any comments posted on my talk page will only be replied to here; I will watch talk pages where I have posted for replies there, and do not expect a reply here.
- Please sign and date your posts using four tildes (~~~~).
- New discussions start below old; you can start a new topic.
- If you wish to talk privately, you can Email me, but please notify me here because I only check my emails once a month or so.
- If you need a faster reply, or a more complex conversation, you can contact me on IRC. My nickname is Matthewedwards. I can be found in #wikipedia connect, #wikipedia-en connect, #wikipedia-en-help connect, or #wikipedia-en-admins connect whenever my status is "online" or "on IRC".
- Discussions are archived after three days of inactivity.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:23, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Completely False Article Frederick Achom
Hello,
I would like to draw your attention to this wikipedia article Frederick Achom, at first look it looks like a good article, but it hides most of the real information. If you see article's history you will see that it has been under several editing wars. Almost all claims made in the article are supported in the article are made using own links or PR releases. Also the links which seem genuine like London's 1000 most influential people 2010: Night OwlsLondon's 1000 most influential people 2011: Night Owls have many things wrong in them- they claim to be 1000 but not more than 6 are present; they have no author. They are off the website but somehow have crept into the website. There are many such cases in this wiki article.
Frederick Achom is using his wiki article to show potential investors how great he is by supplying all false information and duping them of money. He has been previously convicted and jailed which was earlier in the article but now has somehow disappeared. [1] [2]
I hope you will understand the gravity of the situation and help in rectifying by either getting the page deleted or corrected.
Thank You. NihartouJason (talk) 04:35, 14 January 2016 (UTC)