User talk:Joe Gazz84: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Joe Gazz84/Archive/2015/August, User talk:Joe Gazz84/Archive/2015/November) (bot |
→Completely False Article Frederick Achom: new section |
||
Line 174: | Line 174: | ||
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC) |
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC) |
||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692221704 --> |
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692221704 --> |
||
== Completely False Article [[Frederick Achom]] == |
|||
Hello, |
|||
I would like to draw your attention to this wikipedia article [[Frederick Achom]], at first look it looks like a good article, but it hides most of the real information. If you see article's history you will see that it has been under several editing wars. Almost all claims made in the article are supported in the article are made using own links or PR releases. Also the links which seem genuine like [http://www.standard.co.uk/standard-home/londons-1000-most-influential-people-2010-night-owls-6536459.html London's 1000 most influential people 2010: Night Owls][http://www.standard.co.uk/standard-home/londons-1000-most-influential-people-2011-night-owls-6365518.html London's 1000 most influential people 2011: Night Owls] have many things wrong in them- they claim to be 1000 but not more than 6 are present; they have no author. They are off the website but somehow have crept into the website. There are many such cases in this wiki article. |
|||
Frederick Achom is using his wiki article to show potential investors how great he is by supplying all false information and duping them of money. He has been previously convicted and jailed which was earlier in the article but now has somehow disappeared. [http://metro.co.uk/2010/10/13/fraudsters-made-2-5m-from-fine-wine-scam-546303/] |
|||
[http://www.standard.co.uk/goingout/restaurants/wine-scam-costs-investors-110m-6326500.html] |
|||
[http://www.decanter.com/wine-news/bordeaux-fraudster-convicted-37557/] |
|||
[http://www.theguardian.com/money/2008/oct/19/scamsandfraud] |
|||
I hope you will understand the gravity of the situation and help in rectifying by either getting the page deleted or corrected. |
|||
Thank You. [[User:NihartouJason|NihartouJason]] ([[User talk:NihartouJason|talk]]) 04:37, 14 January 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:37, 14 January 2016
AFC Backlog
WikiProject Good Articles - Participant Clean-up (Second Call)
WikiProject Good Articles - Participant Clean-up (Final Call)
The GAN Newsletter (November 2012)
The WikiProject: Good Articles Newsletter (December 2012)
|} |- |
|} WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter - February 2013
Good Article Nominations Request For Comment
AFC Backlog DriveHi, Completely False Article Frederick AchomHello, I would like to draw your attention to this wikipedia article Frederick Achom, at first look it looks like a good article, but it hides most of the real information. If you see article's history you will see that it has been under several editing wars. Almost all claims made in the article are supported in the article are made using own links or PR releases. Also the links which seem genuine like London's 1000 most influential people 2010: Night OwlsLondon's 1000 most influential people 2011: Night Owls have many things wrong in them- they claim to be 1000 but not more than 6 are present; they have no author. They are off the website but somehow have crept into the website. There are many such cases in this wiki article. Frederick Achom is using his wiki article to show potential investors how great he is by supplying all false information and duping them of money. He has been previously convicted and jailed which was earlier in the article but now has somehow disappeared. [1] [2] I hope you will understand the gravity of the situation and help in rectifying by either getting the page deleted or corrected. Thank You. NihartouJason (talk) 04:37, 14 January 2016 (UTC) |