Jump to content

User talk:Tinucherian: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 4 discussion(s) to User talk:Tinucherian/Archives/2015/December) (bot
Line 59: Line 59:
We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:08, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:08, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Godot13@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=698606391 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Godot13@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=698606391 -->

== Completely False Article [[Frederick Achom]] ==

Hello,

I would like to draw your attention to this wikipedia article [[Frederick Achom]], at first look it looks like a good article, but it hides most of the real information. If you see article's history you will see that it has been under several editing wars. Almost all claims made in the article are supported in the article are made using own links or PR releases. Also the links which seem genuine like [http://www.standard.co.uk/standard-home/londons-1000-most-influential-people-2010-night-owls-6536459.html London's 1000 most influential people 2010: Night Owls][http://www.standard.co.uk/standard-home/londons-1000-most-influential-people-2011-night-owls-6365518.html London's 1000 most influential people 2011: Night Owls] have many things wrong in them- they claim to be 1000 but not more than 6 are present; they have no author. They are off the website but somehow have crept into the website. There are many such cases in this wiki article.

Frederick Achom is using his wiki article to show potential investors how great he is by supplying all false information and duping them of money. He has been previously convicted and jailed which was earlier in the article but now has somehow disappeared. [http://metro.co.uk/2010/10/13/fraudsters-made-2-5m-from-fine-wine-scam-546303/]
[http://www.standard.co.uk/goingout/restaurants/wine-scam-costs-investors-110m-6326500.html]

[http://www.decanter.com/wine-news/bordeaux-fraudster-convicted-37557/]
[http://www.theguardian.com/money/2008/oct/19/scamsandfraud]

I hope you will understand the gravity of the situation and help in rectifying by either getting the page deleted or corrected.

Thank You. [[User:NihartouJason|NihartouJason]] ([[User talk:NihartouJason|talk]]) 04:46, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:46, 14 January 2016



Saturday
7
December
Welcome to Tinucherian's Talk page

on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit


Beware! This user's talk page is patrolled by talk page stalkers.




This page was last updated at 10:16:18 January 14, 2016 IST by User:NihartouJason ... My local time is: 11:24, 7 December 2024 IST [refresh].




The Signpost: 30 December 2015

Speedy deletion nomination of Belagur

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Belagur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TF { Contribs } { Edit Quest! } 11:29, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 06 January 2016

WikiCup 2016: Game On!

We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.

We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:04, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2016: Game On!

We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.

We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:08, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Completely False Article Frederick Achom

Hello,

I would like to draw your attention to this wikipedia article Frederick Achom, at first look it looks like a good article, but it hides most of the real information. If you see article's history you will see that it has been under several editing wars. Almost all claims made in the article are supported in the article are made using own links or PR releases. Also the links which seem genuine like London's 1000 most influential people 2010: Night OwlsLondon's 1000 most influential people 2011: Night Owls have many things wrong in them- they claim to be 1000 but not more than 6 are present; they have no author. They are off the website but somehow have crept into the website. There are many such cases in this wiki article.

Frederick Achom is using his wiki article to show potential investors how great he is by supplying all false information and duping them of money. He has been previously convicted and jailed which was earlier in the article but now has somehow disappeared. [1] [2]

[3] [4]

I hope you will understand the gravity of the situation and help in rectifying by either getting the page deleted or corrected.

Thank You. NihartouJason (talk) 04:46, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]