User talk:Majora4

If I leave you a message on your talk page, please reply there.

Eesaia Jude Filbrun

I could find the book - it's self-published with lulu. That doesn't make it notable, but it shows it does exist... Peridon (talk) 22:33, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Rollback?

I see you've been doing a lot of anti-vandalism work. Thanks a lot! Would you like me to enable rollback on your account to make vandalism reversion easier? Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:47, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Yes I would, thank you. I appreciate being trusted with the privilege. – Majora4 (leave a message) 22:41, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello, following a review of your contributions, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please take note of the following:

• Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
• Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
• Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
• Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
• Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
• You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
• You can display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Lists of Pokémon

Thank you for your help giving the empty, split sections summaries. I did the first half of 1-50, but never found time for more. I hope you continue. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 14:52, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Oh dear: Purple Emperor

I'm terribly sorry. I didn't catch the synonym. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:38, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Wait. It's possible that they're distinct. I can't find info on synonyms. Perhaps the genus is called Purple Emperor. I've asked at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Lepidoptera#Possible duplicate article. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

It's okay. Two different species. Sorry if I freaked you out.

By the way, good job on the article. And, it's always a good idea to make redirects for the synonyms. Best wishes,  :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:28, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

No worries. You did a great job. This was the first article I've created, so I wasn't certain about all the procedures and such. Thanks a bunch. – Majora4 (leave a message) 21:37, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

The racist edit

A level 3 warning would be justified, I think. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:46, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your suggestion. I had wondered if a higher level warning might have been appropriate, but I figured the warnings could always escalate if the user continued to vandalize Wikipedia. – Majora4 (leave a message) 22:56, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Fair enough, my friend. Cheers. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:09, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

hamsa

Hamsa

My removing the text where fatima's hand is associated to islam was not a mistake, the text was a mistake. Fatima's hand is purely cultural and is actually considered shirk in islam (a major sin). It is not believed to bring good luck on Islam, to the contrary believing in things such as amulets bringing luck is a major sin.

If you have other questions about shirk or the symbolism of fatima's hand in Islam please read the contents of these links

http://islamqa.info/en/126359 http://islamqa.info/en/34817 I hope you will understand why I have deleted the content from the article and not restore the inaccurate ( and offensive) content

Proposed deletion of Ariel 3 (disambiguation)

I accept your argument and I would not object to a deletion. Arrivisto (talk) 09:01, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Lambert's Cafe

Ok, so that's 5 for me, and 3 for you, but I think ClueBot NG is still in the lead. :P Deunanknute (talk) 06:26, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requested articles/Images

Hello, my friend. Would you permit me to revert this edit? I have found that leaving a few blue links really helps to show that articles are being actively created. This helps encourage others to create articles. Best wishes. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:29, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Oh yes, of course, revert away. I'd love to see more users helping out with the project. Sometimes it feels like I'm the only one. (I know it's not though). Cheers – Majora4 (leave a message) 23:44, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

I see you've done it. Many, many thanks, and keep up the good work! :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

lobachevsky formula redirect

Hi, I think we were in an editing conflict on Angle of parallelism (I first made the new redirect for Lobachevsky's formula to Angle of parallelism and then found that i had to rewrite Angle of parallelism. ((one of them rewriting the section you changed the redirect to). Can you check if all works correct (I am just a beginning editor) WillemienH (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Chanticleer

List of notable former members means former members who are notable. None of those I removed have articles. We should have an article on Matthew Curtis, who is also notable for his work with Eric Whitacre, but I haven't had time to compile one yet.

Incidentally, there's a musical connection with Lobachevsky, in Tom Lehrer's song of the same name. Guy (Help!) 16:43, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Huh? I don't recall editing the Chanticleer article. Let me check my contributions... Oh, shoot. I must have clicked the wrong revert link on the Recent Changes page. Sorry about that. Hope I didn't cause you too much trouble. – Majora4 (leave a message) 21:49, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

NoNoNoNoNo987

I don't see their edits as vandalism. Maybe \me is missing something. —George8211 / T 20:54, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I did indeed mess up. There have been many many edits to Michael Kay (sports broadcaster) today, with many users adding and removing various passages, and I got confused about which edits were vandalism and which were not. I have also apologized directly to NoNoNoNoNo987. – Majora4 (leave a message) 21:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Then all is well. Until the vandals. —George8211 / T 21:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ya friggen try me

ya try me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hugh Jassul (talk • contribs) 03:57, 29 January 2016 (UTC)