Jump to content

Talk:Foster Care Independence Act: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
BattyBot (talk | contribs)
m Talk page general fixes & other cleanup using AWB
{{WikiProject Hillary Rodham Clinton}}
Line 3: Line 3:
{{WikiProject United States|class=C|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject United States|class=C|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Law|class=C}}
{{WikiProject Law|class=C}}
{{WikiProject Hillary Rodham Clinton}}
}}{{WAP assignment |term=2012 Spring| project = WikiProject United States Public Policy | university = [[Western Carolina University]] | course =Wikipedia:United States Education Program/Courses/Western Carolina University: Public Policy Analysis (Chris Cooper) }}
}}{{WAP assignment |term=2012 Spring| project = WikiProject United States Public Policy | university = [[Western Carolina University]] | course =Wikipedia:United States Education Program/Courses/Western Carolina University: Public Policy Analysis (Chris Cooper) }}



Revision as of 05:18, 31 January 2016

Template:WAP assignment

Foster Care Independence Act: Changes Coming Soon

Hi there, although it seems like this page has not been getting much traffic, I wanted to let folks know that I am currently working on updating this page. I should have all the new changes posted within a few days. Although I have used some of the sources already existing, I will be deleting everything on the current page. I am updating the page through the Wikimedia project as part of a MPA public policy class. Any feedback would be much appreciated once the article is posted. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Jrose88 (talk) 05:10, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, we'll see what you come up with. You can see from this page views site that this article gets about 600 views a month. Wasted Time R (talk) 05:46, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi all, page has been updated! Thanks Jrose88 (talk) 17:20, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article Rating

Upon DYK review, it is clear to me that article is of a now substantial quality to warrant a C-Class rating. With some more work and expansion, it could easily get to a B class article without too much effort. Great work so far, and keep it up Kayz911 (talk) 18:52, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination