User talk:AJB43: Difference between revisions
→AE enforcement notice: new section |
|||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#AJB43 | You are reported.]] [[User:Zero0000|Zero]]<sup><small>[[User_talk:Zero0000|talk]]</small></sup> 07:36, 1 February 2016 (UTC) |
[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#AJB43 | You are reported.]] [[User:Zero0000|Zero]]<sup><small>[[User_talk:Zero0000|talk]]</small></sup> 07:36, 1 February 2016 (UTC) |
||
I submitted the dispute for a third opinion earlier, and prior to this reporting. |
|||
{{ping|Zero0000}}. |
|||
[[User:AJB43|AJB43]] ([[User talk:AJB43#top|talk]]) 08:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)AJB43 |
Revision as of 08:00, 1 February 2016
Zero0000, you cannot just post a link to something twice, and not cite the relevant articles that would expressly state that I am not allowed to edit or contribute to the specific topic. Furthermore, telling me to go away is irrelevant. You clearly are not in the loop.
@Zero0000:.
- I didn't get that ping, probably because you didn't sign your statement. Anyway, it is not me but the WP:Arbitration Committee that says you are not allowed to edit the article or its talk page. If you persist I will have you blocked. Zerotalk 06:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Zero0000, I read the link. There is no reason why I cannot edit, for this has nothing to do with any conflict, and this cannot be reasonably assumed. This has to do with pedantry. This is an encyclopedia, using precise terms is key.
Pedantry would have it that by all definitions, what needs to be listed as a successor area to the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration should be the "Palestinian National Authority," not the "State of Palestine."
Again, nothing to do with conflicts, but accurate definitions.
@Zero0000:.
AJB43 (talk) 06:50, 31 January 2016 (UTC)AJB43
Zero0000, you are allowing your political views and ideological spin to get in the way of properly editing an article. On my part, this has nothing to do with politics or ideology.
I have asked you numerous times to cite the relevant article or articles which expressly prohibit me from editing the article. You are either unwilling or (more likely) unable. This isn't supposed to concern me, and doesn't concern me.
The fact that you can ban me, and state that you will do so is petty and unimpressive. You are reverting non-partisan edits for partisan purposes.
Get your act together, or leave Wikipedia.
@Zero0000:.
AJB43 (talk) 06:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)AJB43
AJB43, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi AJB43! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC) |
AE enforcement notice
You are reported. Zerotalk 07:36, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
I submitted the dispute for a third opinion earlier, and prior to this reporting.
@Zero0000:.