Jump to content

Talk:Supply chain management: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
m Removing obsolete {{Afd-merge from}} Errors? User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/AFDMergeFromCleaner
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Afd-merge from|Certified Supply Chain Professional|Certified Supply Chain Professional (2nd nomination)|8 February 2016}}
{{afd-merged-from|Certified Supply Chain Professional|Certified Supply Chain Professional (2nd nomination)|8 February 2016}}
{{afd-merged-from|Certified Supply Chain Professional|Certified Supply Chain Professional|20 May 2014}}
{{afd-merged-from|Certified Supply Chain Professional|Certified Supply Chain Professional|20 May 2014}}
{{talkheader}}
{{talkheader}}

Revision as of 20:39, 8 February 2016

I have recently come across an interesting whitepaper [1] that addresses the key issues in supply chain management and suggests means to streamline the irregularities.10:17, 8 January 2015 (UTC)10:17, 8 January 2015 (UTC)10:17, 8 January 2015 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vedanga Kumar (talkcontribs)

I would like to add www.buyersmeetingpoint.com as a link under supply chain management. This is an eductional site for procurement professionals to share experiences and knowledge among their peers. The majority of information is available at no cost. There is a forum for professionals to share their knowledge and ask questions to others in the industry. This seems to be a helpful and appropriate link for those interested in procurement.BMPmanagement (talk) 00:18, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:EL. In general, such links are inappropriate. You probably should read WP:COI as well if you haven't yet. --Ronz (talk) 01:39, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The definition of Supply Chain Management given in the first paragraph is quite adequate but I think it needs to be made clear that Supply Chain Management is nothing more than a rather long-winded name for what used to be called Operations, but I will leave it to the original author as to how he/she may like to word it.Snookerrobot (talk) 21:05, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SCM subsumes Ops Management, insofar as Ops is insular, looking at the input/output of an isolated system, e.g., a production floor, whereas SCM looks at a daisy-chain of such cells, e.g., from raw materials to consumer. *Some* Ops Managers started calling themselves SCMs as information technology allowed (and international business demanded) a wider and more transparent view of sourcing and distribution, but there are still "just" Ops Managers. Sean Scheiderer (talk) 06:38, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

First sentence doesn't make sense

The first sentence in the introduction doesn't make sense to me. The phrasing is very ambiguous. There might be a huge grammatical error, or perhaps it just needs to be worded differently. I want to reword it myself, but I can't really figure out what it's saying as I am not familiar with SCM at all. (That's why I'm here.) un4v41l48l3 (talk) 17:49, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just a completed a merge from Certified Supply Chain Professional to the Certification section. Feel free to edit for better integration into the main article. Looking over the work, it is my impression that the big cert organization table, while referenced at some level, probably has quite a lot of synthesis, per WP:SYNTHESIS, in its creation. It may be better to delete it, but I will leave that to the experts to determine. --Mark viking (talk) 18:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking at it last night; will clean it up this evening when I get home. I recalled a lot of OR involved in the article. Kuru (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]