Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viaedge: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Lakun.patra (talk | contribs) delete |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —[[User:UY Scuti|<font color="CornflowerBlue" face="Times">'''UY Scuti'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:UY Scuti|<font color="Green" face= "Times">Talk</font>]]</sup> 18:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Viaedge]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —[[User:UY Scuti|<font color="CornflowerBlue" face="Times">'''UY Scuti'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:UY Scuti|<font color="Green" face= "Times">Talk</font>]]</sup> 18:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Viaedge]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
||
*'''Delete''' - I couldn't find any evidence this company or its products are notable. I went looking for analyst attention (e.g. Gartner, Forrester) and could find none. [[User:SJK|SJK]] ([[User talk:SJK|talk]]) 10:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - I couldn't find any evidence this company or its products are notable. I went looking for analyst attention (e.g. Gartner, Forrester) and could find none. [[User:SJK|SJK]] ([[User talk:SJK|talk]]) 10:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' - Could find no sources to establish notability. [[User:Lakun.patra|Lakun.patra]] ([[User talk:Lakun.patra|talk]]) 16:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:10, 11 February 2016
- Viaedge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A run of the mill software company that fails WP:GNG, WP:CORPDEPTH, and any number of other policies and guidelines. (All my best wishes to the proprietors and coders - I use a Citrix app at work) Shirt58 (talk) 13:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:56, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:56, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:56, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Clearly nothing else to suggest hinting better. SwisterTwister talk 04:49, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 18:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 18:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - I couldn't find any evidence this company or its products are notable. I went looking for analyst attention (e.g. Gartner, Forrester) and could find none. SJK (talk) 10:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Could find no sources to establish notability. Lakun.patra (talk) 16:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)