User talk:KH-1: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 05:25, 21 February 2016

Click here to leave a message

Archive

Talk Archives

Mistake?

Why did you revert this helpful edit (which verified the claim)? You check to see what the edits are before changing them, right? -- James26 (talk) 16:03, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There was evidence of dead link spamming.-KH-1 (talk) 23:48, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ok

ok — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apurvajagma (talk • contribs) 09:47, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hypnosis edits

very weird don't understand criteria for relevant citations and why some of my work is being deleted? Hypnosis article/ two citations in particular from a website houstonhypnosis.com which contained supporting content. Please advise. Are less citations better in this article or is there some types of domains which should never be referenced no matter what?? This is rather frustrating as time is spent searching for relevant citations which support statements made in the article but I do not see where a criteria FAQ is posted???? Please advise.

Jimmi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimiedwards (talk • contribs) 16:30, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CLEARLY PHIL TOWN DIDN'T SERVE AS GREEN BERRET OVER IN VIETNAM. THERE'S A CURRENT INVESTIGATION.

STOP HELPING THIS POSER. HE EMBELLISHED HIS VALORS.

Undid revision 701253825 by KH-1. The referred article is one of the most notable publications on Computer Forensic Specialisations available.

Talk page attempted to correct this issue in 2013, but was ignored by the activists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Outback1964 (talk • contribs) 11:11, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wahbi Khazri

Done. Giant Snowman 13:19, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why was the original link allowed, but not my edit?

Hi, I'm completely new to wikipedia, that was my only contribution ever, so I'm interested in learning what part of ELNO is relevant here, particiularly what's the difference between ELNO as applied to the original link (before it died, obviously), and the working generator I linked to. Did the original one just slip through before it died, or is there a difference? I think acronymgenerator.net should be listed as it can generate, e.g. from the keywords:

"seasonal disarray melancholy emotive"

the backronym

"SAD: SEASONAL, AFFECTIVE, DISORDERLINESS",

for example. Is that not a valid backronym generator? And if not strictly, in your opinion, why not and is not the pursuit of an example of a working backronym generator any longer desired and if not, why not? Paulskypod (talk) 12:46, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's no difference - it shouldn't have been included either. -KH-1 (talk) 02:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cauliflower

Thank you. I was having some trouble undoing myself. 400 Lux (talk) 02:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fugg off I'm the king of rock hill

Revision as of 02:45, 21 February 2016 edit 400 Lux (talk \| contribs) 217 edits →Cauliflower: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:25, 21 February 2016 edit undo 208.87.75.10 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 47:		Line 47:

	Thank you. I was having some trouble undoing myself. [[User:400 Lux\|400 Lux]] ([[User talk:400 Lux\|talk]]) 02:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)		Thank you. I was having some trouble undoing myself. [[User:400 Lux\|400 Lux]] ([[User talk:400 Lux\|talk]]) 02:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

			Fugg off I'm the king of rock hill