Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Legendswillneverdie: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== |
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== |
||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
I will admit that I did use an IP address to correct a release date without citing a source. I understand what I did was wrong & for that I sincerely apologize |
|||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
Revision as of 04:44, 25 February 2016
Legendswillneverdie
Legendswillneverdie (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: suspected
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Legendswillneverdie/Archive.
22 February 2016
– This SPI case is open.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
The IP sock from Michigan appeared again. Like the previous sockpuppets, which can be seen at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Legendswillneverdie/Archive#08 November 2015, the user repeatedly changes hip hop albums' release dates without citing any reliables sources. For example, both Legendswillneverdie and 2600:1007:B011:59C7:8CD1:6DFC:B295:22C1 removed Quality Control (album), which I added Metacritic as a source [1], from "June 6" at 2000 in hip hop music [2] [3]. Legendswillneverdie keeps doing this kind of IP socking in spite of having been blocked three times, and this is the fourth time I open this investigation. I believe they have already gotten all the rope they need. 153.218.164.157 (talk) 02:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. I will admit that I did use an IP address to correct a release date without citing a source. I understand what I did was wrong & for that I sincerely apologize