Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Day of Research: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
deletion reasons |
Sammi Brie (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===[[A Day of Research]]=== |
===[[A Day of Research]]=== |
||
Five cleanup tags on one article? Not a good sign. Unsourced naked tracklist, apparently for an album by [[Gerling]], but this is the only one in a list of red links with an "article". Clearly doesn't need to be separate. [[User:Opabinia regalis|Opabinia regalis]] 04:32, 20 August 2006 (UTC) |
Five cleanup tags on one article? Not a good sign. Unsourced naked tracklist, apparently for an album by [[Gerling]], but this is the only one in a list of red links with an "article". Clearly doesn't need to be separate. [[User:Opabinia regalis|Opabinia regalis]] 04:32, 20 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
'''Strong delete''' per nom. Is that '''5''' cleanup tags? It's a sight for sore eyes. Plus an AFD tag and a music stub tag and the templates are 3x longer than the track listing, plus all categories are for the tags: the only one close to the subject is the stub template. Wow. What a delete! [[User:TrackerTV|TrackerTV]] <small>([[User talk:TrackerTV|CW]]|[[Special:Contributions/TrackerTV|Castform]]|[[Special:Emailuser/TrackerTV|Green Valley]])</small> 04:52, 20 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:52, 20 August 2006
Five cleanup tags on one article? Not a good sign. Unsourced naked tracklist, apparently for an album by Gerling, but this is the only one in a list of red links with an "article". Clearly doesn't need to be separate. Opabinia regalis 04:32, 20 August 2006 (UTC) Strong delete per nom. Is that 5 cleanup tags? It's a sight for sore eyes. Plus an AFD tag and a music stub tag and the templates are 3x longer than the track listing, plus all categories are for the tags: the only one close to the subject is the stub template. Wow. What a delete! TrackerTV (CW|Castform|Green Valley) 04:52, 20 August 2006 (UTC)