Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Day of Research: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Daniel Case (talk | contribs) |
Delete — Fails everything, and I mean everything.... :using WikiVoter |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*'''Strong delete''' per nom. Is that '''5''' cleanup tags? It's a sight for sore eyes. Plus an AFD tag and a music stub tag and the templates are 3x longer than the track listing, plus all categories are for the tags: the only one close to the subject is the stub template. Wow. What a delete! [[User:TrackerTV|TrackerTV]] <small>([[User talk:TrackerTV|CW]]|[[Special:Contributions/TrackerTV|Castform]]|[[Special:Emailuser/TrackerTV|Green Valley]])</small> 04:52, 20 August 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Strong delete''' per nom. Is that '''5''' cleanup tags? It's a sight for sore eyes. Plus an AFD tag and a music stub tag and the templates are 3x longer than the track listing, plus all categories are for the tags: the only one close to the subject is the stub template. Wow. What a delete! [[User:TrackerTV|TrackerTV]] <small>([[User talk:TrackerTV|CW]]|[[Special:Contributions/TrackerTV|Castform]]|[[Special:Emailuser/TrackerTV|Green Valley]])</small> 04:52, 20 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Strong delete''' and I'm getting rid of the cleanup tags in the meantime. There is absolutely no reason to have them on a page, IMO, as long as it's up for deletion. It sends a mixed message, for one thing. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] 05:00, 20 August 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Strong delete''' and I'm getting rid of the cleanup tags in the meantime. There is absolutely no reason to have them on a page, IMO, as long as it's up for deletion. It sends a mixed message, for one thing. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] 05:00, 20 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete — ''' Fails everything, and I mean everything. [[User:SynergeticMaggot|SynergeticMaggot]] 12:36, 20 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:36, 20 August 2006
Five cleanup tags on one article? Not a good sign. Unsourced naked tracklist, apparently for an album by Gerling, but this is the only one in a list of red links with an "article". Clearly doesn't need to be separate. Opabinia regalis 04:32, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete per nom. Is that 5 cleanup tags? It's a sight for sore eyes. Plus an AFD tag and a music stub tag and the templates are 3x longer than the track listing, plus all categories are for the tags: the only one close to the subject is the stub template. Wow. What a delete! TrackerTV (CW|Castform|Green Valley) 04:52, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete and I'm getting rid of the cleanup tags in the meantime. There is absolutely no reason to have them on a page, IMO, as long as it's up for deletion. It sends a mixed message, for one thing. Daniel Case 05:00, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete — Fails everything, and I mean everything. SynergeticMaggot 12:36, 20 August 2006 (UTC)