Talk:Mornington Crescent (game): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:40, 29 February 2016

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Radio High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Games (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Games, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.GamesWikipedia:WikiProject GamesTemplate:WikiProject GamesGames

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Comedy Mid‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

London Transport Low‑importance

	London transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wikipedia:WikiProject London Transport/PLT-sa

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mornington Crescent (game) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 31 days

Archives

1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by .

1,2,3 O'Leary

I've heard of a game similar to this called 1,2,3 O'Leary in which the first person to say "1,2,3 O'Leary" is the winner. Utterly pointless and not very funny though. Anyone else heard of this??

Chaim Levitz

I can find no evidence for the existence of this person. I propose to delete the sentence about him if nothing is provided within the next few days. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shaftesbury Avenue predecessor

I've just reverted the claim that the game was invented in a pub in 1970, by some actors who had no apparent connection to ISIHAC. This is only sourced to some letters to the editor in the Guardian newspaper (which I assume fall under WP:USERGENERATED) - I suspect we shouldn't quote a user-generated source for as bold a claim as "Bunny May says that Geoffrey Perkins and Humphrey Lyttleton are wrong, and he invented the game in 1970", as per WP:SELFSOURCE this is both self-serving and makes claims about third parties. If there are any stronger sources out there then it'd be great to track the true history of Mornington Crescent, but I don't feel that this source is, by itself, enough to support "game claims to have been invented by actors in 1970". --McGeddon (talk) 16:39, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What is it really?

An actual game, or an improv routine involving appearing to play a game with non-obvious rules? --TiagoTiago (talk) 03:54, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's an actual game. Lovingboth (talk) 13:40, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well it's a fake parlour game. It is a game in that it is play-acting. Mezigue (talk) 15:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it's probably more than a board game rather than a parlour game. There was a certain time where the rules said the first move could be "Mornington Crescent". So logically this would suggest every other time you can't play MC on first round. But who knows...? Slightnostalgia (talk) 22:41, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there was such a time that the opening move could be MC itself. But Froggatt's rule (1932, Camberwell) as much as it might be occasionally overlooked in the 21st century, states that, in common with visits to "real" stations on the "real" tube, it is the journey, not the destination, that is the point.Twistlethrop (talk) 13:24, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook App?

This doesn't seem to exist. Unless FaceBollox is playing up again? Smokey TheCat 03:47, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Modest Proposal

In the spirit of the game itself and as a wonderful Wikipedia easter egg I would like to propose modifying this article to maintain the fiction that Mornington Crescent is a real game. I think any damage to Wikipedia's factual veracity would be excusable in this rather singular case. --Andybak (talk) 11:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds like a great idea! I bet there are many who would dissent, and claim that Wikipedia is not a place for jokes and japes, but, frankly, if anybody falls for it, they shouldn't really be allowed to sit on a chair without supervision, let alone voice opinions. ;-) Pollythewasp (talk) 13:40, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 11:38, 11 January 2016 edit Andybak (talk \| contribs) 115 edits m →A Modest Proposal: sign and timestamp ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:40, 29 February 2016 edit undo Pollythewasp (talk \| contribs) 176 edits →A Modest Proposal Next edit →
Line 44:		Line 44:

	In the spirit of the game itself and as a wonderful Wikipedia easter egg I would like to propose modifying this article to maintain the fiction that Mornington Crescent is a real game. I think any damage to Wikipedia's factual veracity would be excusable in this rather singular case. --[[User:Andybak\|Andybak]] ([[User talk:Andybak\|talk]]) 11:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)		In the spirit of the game itself and as a wonderful Wikipedia easter egg I would like to propose modifying this article to maintain the fiction that Mornington Crescent is a real game. I think any damage to Wikipedia's factual veracity would be excusable in this rather singular case. --[[User:Andybak\|Andybak]] ([[User talk:Andybak\|talk]]) 11:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

			That sounds like a great idea! I bet there are many who would dissent, and claim that Wikipedia is not a place for jokes and japes, but, frankly, if anybody falls for it, they shouldn't really be allowed to sit on a chair without supervision, let alone voice opinions. ;-) [[User:Pollythewasp\|Pollythewasp]] ([[User talk:Pollythewasp\|talk]]) 13:40, 29 February 2016 (UTC)